Advertisement

Experimental investigations and numerical prediction on the effect of shielding area and post flow time in the GTAW of CP Ti sheets

  • A. KarpagarajEmail author
  • N. Siva Shanmugam
  • K. Sankaranarayanasamy
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, bead on plate (BoP) trials are conducted on 2-mm thick commercially pure titanium (CP Ti) sheets by gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) process. Welding current (75–105 A) and joining speed (250–300 mm/min) are taken as the variables. In the weld samples’ appearance of the surface, colorizations are noticed for understanding the role of shielding gas. BoP trials are subjected to metallographic examination to measure weld profiles. These measured values are fed as input for the Goldak double ellipsoidal model to performing the GTAW process. For BoP trials, temperature profile and Iso-surface contours along the moving heat source direction are taken at various time intervals. From the temperature history, shielding area and post flow time are identified. A shielding arrangement is fabricated and implemented based on these bead profile and temperature profile history. After the successful fabrication of shielding arrangement, experimental butt joints are made by GTAW process to verify the efficiency of shielding arrangement. Bead profile of experimentally fabricated 1.6-mm and 2-mm butt joints are compared and verified against the finite element model results. Moreover, cupping test is conducted to analyze the ductility of the joints. The maximum elongation of 96.10% is measured for 1.6-mm face out joints from cupping test.

Keywords

GTAW process Weld profile Welding simulation Shielding arrangements Erichsen cupping test 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P (2001) Titanium in medicine. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, pp 1–1019. ISBN: 978-3-642-63119-1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56486-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akman E, Demir A, Canel T, Sinmazçelik T (2009) Laser welding of Ti6Al4V titanium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 209:3705–3713.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pasang T, Sánchez Amaya JM, Tao Y et al (2013) Comparison of Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr welds performed by laser beam, electron beam and gas tungsten arc welding. Procedia Eng 63:397–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devendranath Ramkumar K, Mishra D, Ganesh Raj B, Vignesh MK, Thiruvengatam G, Sudharshan SP, Arivazhagan N, Sivashanmugam N, Rabel AM (2015) Effect of optimal weld parameters in the microstructure and mechanical properties of autogeneous gas tungsten arc weldments of super-duplex stainless steel UNS S32750. Mater Des 66:356–365.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.084. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meran C (2006) Prediction of the optimized welding parameters for the joined brass plates using genetic algorithm. Mater Des 27:356–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Komanduri R, Hou ZB (2000) Thermal analysis of the arc welding process: part I. General solutions. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 31:1353–1370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-000-0022-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fassani RN, Trevisan OV (2003) Analytical modeling of multi pass welding process with distributed heat source. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 25(3):302–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M (1984) A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 15(2):299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hashemzadeh M, Chen BQ, Guedes Soares C (2014) Comparison between different heat source types in thin-plate welding simulation. In: Guedes Soares C, Lopez Pena F (eds) Developments in maritime transportation and exploitation of sea resources. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 329–336Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anca A, Cardona A, Risso J, Fachinotti VD (2011) Finite element modeling of welding processes. Appl Math Model 35:688–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.026 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yadaiah NB (2012) Effect of heat source parameters in thermal and mechanical analysis of linear GTA welding process. ISIJ Int 52:2069–2075.  https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.2069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perzyński K, Rauch Ł, Szeliga D, Rońda J, Pietrzyk M (2010) The computer system for design of the TIG welding operation. J Mach Eng 10:61–67Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Long H, Gery D, Carlier A, Maropoulos PG (2009) Prediction of welding distortion in butt joint of thin plates. Mater Des 30:4126–4135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gery D, Long H, Maropoulos P (2005) Effects of welding speed, energy input and heat source distribution on temperature variations in butt joint welding. J Mater Process Technol 167:393–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Varghese VMJ, Suresh MR, Kumar DS (2013) Recent developments in modeling of heat transfer during TIG welding—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:749–754.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4048-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shanmugam NS, Buvanashekaran G, Sankaranarayanasamy K, Ramesh Kumar S (2010) A transient finite element simulation of the temperature and bead profiles of T-joint laser welds. Mater Des 31:4528–4542.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jegadeesan K, Elsen R (2016) Empirical and finite element prediction and validation of weld bead profile generated during TIG welding process. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (GJPAM) 12(4):15–20Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jia X, Xu J, Liu Z (2014) A new method to estimate heat source parameters in gas metal arc welding simulation process. Fusion Eng Des 89:40–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Attarha MJ, Sattari-Far I (2011) Study on welding temperature distribution in thin welded plates through experimental measurements and finite element simulation. J Mater Process Technol 211(4):688–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li X (2005) Effects of oxygen contamination in the argon shielding gas in laser welding of commercially pure titanium thin sheet. J Mater Sci 40(13):3437–3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Danielson P, Wilson R, Alman D (2004) Microstructure of titanium welds. Adv Mater Process 161(2):39–42Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Little GH, Kamtekar AG (1998) The effect of thermal properties and weld efficiency on transient temperatures during welding. Comput Struct 68:157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00040-6 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stenbacka N, Choquet I, Hurtig K (2012) Review of arc efficiency values for gas tungsten arc welding. In: IIW Commission IV-XII-SG212, Intermediate Meeting. BAM, Berlin, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choi BH, Choi BK (2008) The effect of welding conditions according to mechanical properties of pure titanium. J Mater Process Technol 201:526–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marya SK (1996) Effect of minor chemistry elements on GTA weld fusion zone characteristics of a commercial grade titanium. Scr Mater 34(11):1741–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aleksander APL (2012) Laser welding of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V using a disk laser. MTM J 7:53–56Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karpagaraj A, Siva shanmugam N, Sankaranarayanasamy K (2015) Some studies on mechanical properties and microstructural characterization of automated TIG welding of thin commercially pure titanium sheets. Mater Sci Eng A 640:180–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahboubkhah M (2013) Determination of the forming limit diagrams by using the fem and experimental method. J Mech Sci Technol 27:1437–1442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-013-0324-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Karpagaraj A, Siva Shanmugam N, Sankaranarayanasamy K (2016) Studies on mechanical behavior and microstructural analysis of tailor welded blanks of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy sheet. J Mater Res 31:2186–2196.  https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen FK, Lin SY (2007) A formability index for the deep drawing of stainless steel rectangular cups. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:878–888.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0659-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anil Kumar A, Satapathy S, Ravi Kumar D (2010) Effect of sheet thickness and punch roughness on formability of sheets in hydromechanical deep drawing. J Mater Eng Perform 19:1150–1160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-010-9602-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li J, Nayak SS, Biro E, Panda SK, Goodwin F, Zhou Y (2013) Effects of weld line position and geometry on the formability of laser welded high strength low alloy and dual-phase steel blanks. Mater Des 52:757–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Karpagaraj
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Siva Shanmugam
    • 2
  • K. Sankaranarayanasamy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyPatnaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyTiruchirappalliIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyPuducherryIndia

Personalised recommendations