Advertisement

Development and characterisation of secured traceability tag for textile products by printing process

  • Tarun Kumar AgrawalEmail author
  • Christine Campagne
  • Ludovic Koehl
Open Access
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Product security is one of the major concerns in the textile industry. Every year, fashion brands suffer significant loss due to counterfeit products. Addressing this, the paper introduces a secured tag for traceability and security of textile products. The proposed tag is unclonable, which can be manufactured using conventional screen-printing process. Further, it can be read using a smartphone camera to authenticate the product and trace its history. Consequently, imparting additional functionality to the textile through surface modification. To validate its applicability, the study experimentally investigates the durability and readability of the developed secured tag using three different binders on polyester and cotton textiles substrates. A comparison is presented with an in-depth analysis of surfaces and binders interaction at different stages of the secured tag lifecycle, i.e. before print, after print, after wash and after abrasion cycles. The methodology and findings of the study can also be useful for other manufacturing domains dealing with the printing process.

Keywords

Secured tag Traceability Screen printing Adhesion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Christian Catel from ENSAIT/GEMTEX, France, for his time and help.

Funding

This work has been comprehended in the framework of Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate Project—SMDTex (Sustainable Management and Design for Textiles), which is financed by the European Commission.

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta D (2011) Functional clothing—definition and classification. Indian J Fibre Text Res 36:321–326Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agrawal TK, Thomassey S, Cochrane C, Lemort G, Koncar V (2017) Low-cost intelligent carpet system for footstep detection. IEEE Sensors J 17:4239–4247.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2703633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelly FM, Meunier L, Cochrane C, Koncar V (2013) Polyaniline: application as solid state electrochromic in a flexible textile display. Displays 34:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2012.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahadir MC, Bahadir SK (2015) Selection of appropriate e-textile structure manufacturing process prior to sensor integration using AHP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:1719–1730.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6399-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen Y, Ge F, Guang S, Cai Z (2018) Low-cost and large-scale flexible SERS-cotton fabric as a wipe substrate for surface trace analysis. Appl Surf Sci 436:111–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pulit-Prociak J, Chwastowski J, Kucharski A, Banach M (2016) Functionalization of textiles with silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 385:543–553.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morent R, De Geyter N (2011) Improved textile functionality through surface modifications. In: Pan N, Sun G (eds) Functional textiles for improved performance, protection and health. Woodhead Publishing, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cao J, Huang Z, Wang C (2018) Natural printed silk substrate circuit fabricated via surface modification using one step thermal transfer and reduction graphene oxide. Appl Surf Sci 440:177–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oner M, Ustundag A, Budak A (2017) An RFID-based tracking system for denim production processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:591–604.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9385-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Merilampi SL, Björninen T, Ukkonen L, Ruuskanen P, Sydänheimo L (2011) Characterization of UHF RFID tags fabricated directly on convex surfaces by pad printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:577–591.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2869-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weremczuk J, Tarapata G, Jachowicz R (2012) Humidity sensor printed on textile with use of ink-jet technology. Procedia Eng 47:1366–1369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang K, Freeman C, Torah R, Beeby S, Tudor J (2014) Screen printed fabric electrode array for wearable functional electrical stimulation. Sensors Actuators A Phys 213:108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2014.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Street RA, Ng TN, Schwartz DE, Whiting GL, Lu JP, Bringans RD, Veres J (2015) From printed transistors to printed smart systems. Proc IEEE 103:607–618.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2408552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Locher I, Tröster G (2007) Screen-printed textile transmission lines. Text Res J 77:837–842.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517507080679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Little AF, Christie RM (2010) Textile applications of photochromic dyes. Part 2: factors affecting the photocoloration of textiles screen-printed with commercial photochromic dyes. Color Technol 126:164–170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2010.00242.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abe T (2012) Present state of inkjet printing technology for textile. Adv Mater Res 441:23–27.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.441.23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cherenack K, van Pieterson L (2012) Smart textiles: challenges and opportunities. J Appl Phys 112:091301.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4742728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guan Y, Hu J, Li Y, Ma W, Zheng Y (2011) A new anti-counterfeiting method: fluorescent labeling by safranine T in tobacco seed. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1271–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0657-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu H, Chen Q-W, Tang J, Hu XY, Zhou XH (2012) Photonic anti-counterfeiting using structural colors derived from magnetic-responsive photonic crystals with double photonic bandgap heterostructures. J Mater Chem 22:11048–11053.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM30169E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ilie-Zudor E, Kemény Z, van Blommestein F, Monostori L, van der Meulen A (2011) A survey of applications and requirements of unique identification systems and RFID techniques. Comput Ind 62:227–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar V, Koehl L, Zeng X, Ekwall D (2017) Coded yarn based tag for tracking textile supply chain. J Manuf Syst 42:124–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cui Y, Phang IY, Lee YH, Lee MR, Zhang Q, Ling XY (2015) Multiplex plasmonic anti-counterfeiting security labels based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Chem Commun Camb Engl 51:5363–5366.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc08596e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bansal D, Malla S, Gudala K, Tiwari P (2013) Anti-counterfeit technologies: a pharmaceutical industry perspective. Sci Pharm 81:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.1202-03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seino K, Kuwabara S, Mikami S, et al (2004) Development of the traceability system which secures the safety of fishery products using the QR code and a digital signature. In: Oceans ‘04. Mtts/IEEE Techno-Ocean ‘04. pp 476–481Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sowade E, Göthel F, Zichner R, Baumann RR (2015) Inkjet printing of UHF antennas on corrugated cardboards for packaging applications. Appl Surf Sci 332:500–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Strickland LS, Hunt LE (2005) Technology, security, and individual privacy: new tools, new threats, and new public perceptions. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 56:221–234.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar V, Koehl L, Zeng X (2016) A fully yarn integrated tag for tracking the international textile supply chain. J Manuf Syst 40:76–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luttropp C, Johansson J (2010) Improved recycling with life cycle information tagged to the product. J Clean Prod 18:346–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Devadas S, Suh E, Paral S, et al (2008) Design and implementation of PUF-based “Unclonable” RFID ICs for anti-counterfeiting and security applications. In: 2008 IEEE international conference on RFID. pp 58–64Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Agrawal TK, Koehl L, Campagne C (2018) A secured tag for implementation of traceability in textile and clothing supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:2563–2577.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2638-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Product - CHT group - special chemicals. https://www.cht.com/cht/web.nsf/id/pa_en_productdetail.html?Open&pID=00039825.108_EN. Accessed 4 Jun 2018Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Coating silicone SILBIONE TCS 7541 A | Elkem Silicones. https://silicones.elkem.com/EN/our_offer/Product/90060757/90060758/SILBIONE-TCS-7541-A. Accessed 20 Nov 2018Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Archroma coatings, adhesives & sealants. http://www.cas.archroma.com/. Accessed 20 Nov 2018Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Home. https://www.geotech.nl/en/. Accessed 20 Nov 2018Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Young T, Peacock G, Leitch J (1855) Miscellaneous works of the late Thomas Young. J. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Owens DK, Wendt RC Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13:1741–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815, 1969
  38. 38.
    Fowkes FM (1962) Determination of interfacial tensions, contact angles, and dispersion forces in surfaces by assuming additivity of intermolecular interactions in surfaces. J Phys Chem 66:382–382.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j100808a524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Di J, Perwuelz A, Gueguen V (2001) The surface energy of PET fabrics coated with silicone. J Text Inst 92:184–192.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000108659569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Duda RO, Hart PE (1972) Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun ACM 15:11–15.  https://doi.org/10.1145/361237.361242 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lipatov YS (1995) Polymer reinforcement. ChemTec PublishingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarun Kumar Agrawal
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Christine Campagne
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ludovic Koehl
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.ENSAIT, GEMTEX – Laboratoire de Génie et Matériaux TextilesLilleFrance
  2. 2.Université Lille Nord de FranceLilleFrance
  3. 3.The Swedish School of TextilesUniversity of BorasBorasSweden
  4. 4.College of Textile and Clothing EngineeringSoochow UniversitySuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations