Advertisement

Toolpath generation for the manufacture of metallic components by means of the laser metal deposition technique

  • Jon FloresEmail author
  • Iker Garmendia
  • Joseba Pujana
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In this paper, a novel toolpath generation approach is proposed for concentric laser metal deposition (LMD) technology, which is an additive manufacturing (AM) process. The toolpaths define the movements to be carried out by the deposition head to manufacture the part through a layer-by-layer construction process. In this way, the characteristics of the generated deposition strategy directly affect the quality of the construction, that could lead to geometric distortions and irreparable defects. This work introduces a toolpath generator that provides several capacities with respect to the previous works: (1) an optimized hybrid deposition strategy that combines contour curves and zigzag filling patterns and ensure a uniform Z growth for each layer by a constant overlap parameter, (2) a multi-axis movement strategy that guarantees the deposition on the previous layer in overhang walls, and (3) a non-planar slicing strategy that adapts the layers to the variable vertical growth in single-bead wall structures with variable inclinations and multi-axis deposition strategy. The effectiveness of the generated toolpaths was proved through the implementation and validation on LMD technologies by the construction of different three-dimensional geometries.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Laser metal deposition Toolpath generation Multi-axis Adaptive slicing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

The authors wish to acknowledge the support given by IHOBE society and FEDER funds through the Addieco granted project and Addisend project granted by the Basque Government in the Elkartek 2018 program.

References

  1. 1.
    Rebaioli L, Fassi I (2017) A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical performance of additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:2571–2598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0570-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu R, Wang Z, Sparks T et al (2016) 13 - Aerospace applications of laser additive manufacturing. In: Laser additive manufacturing: materials, design, technologies, and applications. Elsevier Ltd, pp 351–371Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ren L, Sparks T, Ruan J, Liou F (2008) Process planning strategies for solid freeform fabrication of metal parts. J Manuf Syst 27:158–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2009.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nilsiam Y, Sanders P, Pearce JM (2017) Slicer and process improvements for open-source GMAW-based metal 3-D printing. Addit Manuf 18:110–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tang Q, Yin S, Zhang Y, Wu J (2018) A tool vector control for laser additive manufacturing in five-axis configuration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:1671–1684.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2177-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Oliveira U, Ocelík V, de Hosson JTM (2005) Analysis of coaxial laser micro cladding processing conditions. Surf Coatings Technol 197:127–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graf B, Ammer S, Gumenyuk A, Rethmeier M (2013) Design of experiments for laser metal deposition in maintenance, repair and overhaul applications. Procedia CIRP 11:245–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang K, Liu W, Shang X (2007) Research on the processing experiments of laser metal deposition shaping. Opt Laser Technol 39:549–557.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2005.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spranger F, Graf B, Schuch M et al (2018) Build-up strategies for additive manufacturing of three dimensional Ti-6Al-4V-parts produced by laser metal deposition. J Laser Appl 30:022001.  https://doi.org/10.2351/1.4997852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montero JN, Rodríguez A, Amado JM et al (2015) Some optimization strategies for tool path generation in 3D laser metal deposition. In: Lasers in manufacturing conferenceGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2014) A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:173–183.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5808-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mazumder J, Schifferer A, Choi J (1999) Direct materials deposition: Designed macro and microstructure. Mater Res Innov 3:118–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s100190050137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farouki RT, Koenig T, Tarabanis KA et al (1995) Path planning with offset curves for layered fabrication processes. J Manuf Syst 14:355–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6125(95)98872-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parkm SC, Choi BK (2000) Tool-path planning for direction-parallel area milling. CAD Comput Aided Des 32:17–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(99)00080-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Routhu S (2010) 2D path planning for direct laser deposition process. In: Proceedings of ASME design engeneering technical conference, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin Y, He Y, Zhong FJ et al (2014) Optimization of tool-path generation for material extrusion-based additive manufacturing technology. Addit Manuf 1:32–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) A practical path planning methodology for wire and arc additive manufacturing of thin-walled structures. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 34:8–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rui W, Haiou Z, Guilan W et al (2017) Generation of deposition paths and quadrilateral meshes in additive manufacturing. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposiumGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jin GQ, Li WD, Gao L (2013) An adaptive process planning approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29:23–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jin Y, He Y, Fu G et al (2017) A non-retraction path planning approach for extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 48:132–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arregui L, Garmendia I, Pujana J, Soriano C (2018) Study of the geometrical limitations associated to the Metallic Part Manufacturing by the LMD process. Procedia CIRP 68:363–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee K, Jee H (2015) Slicing algorithms for multi-axis 3-D metal printing of overhangs. J Mech Sci Technol 29:5139–5144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1113-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ruan J, Eiamsa-Ard K, Liou FW (2005) Automatic process planning and toolpath generation of a multiaxis hybrid manufacturing system. J Manuf Process 7:57–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(05)70082-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kapil S, Negi S, Joshi P et al (2017) 5-axis slicing methods for additive manufacturing process. In: Annual international solid freeform fabrication symposiumGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flemmer J, Pirch N, Drinck F (2015) LMDCAM2: software tool for near-net repair, cladding and built-up by Laser Metal Deposition. In: ASME 2015 international manufacturingGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boisselier D, Sankaré S, Engel T (2014) Improvement of the laser direct metal deposition process in 5-axis configuration. Phys Procedia 56:239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Garmendia I, Leunda J, Pujana J, Lamikiz A (2018) In-process height control during laser metal deposition based on structured light 3D scanning. Procedia CIRP 68:375–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhu G, Li D, Zhang A et al (2012) The influence of laser and powder defocusing characteristics on the surface quality in laser direct metal deposition. Opt Laser Technol 44:349–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2011.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IK4-TEKNIKER, Mechanical Engineering UnitEibarSpain

Personalised recommendations