Advertisement

Thermal gradient and its contribution to size effect of specific cutting energy

  • G. G. Ye
  • S. F. Xue
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The size effect of specific cutting energy is one of the most fundamental and challenging problems in metal cutting. The size effect phenomenon has been attributed to the material strengthening effect due to strain, strain rate, and strain gradient. However, the contribution of the material strengthening caused by temperature effect in the primary shear zone is rarely studied. Here, orthogonal cutting experiments under different initial temperature were conducted. It shows the significant dependence of the size effect phenomenon on the temperature effect. The finite element methods were further conducted to reveal the underlying reason of the size effect. It is found that there exists high-temperature gradient in the primary shear zone along the shear direction, which causes the average temperature in the primary shear zone to drop with decreased uncut chip thickness, giving rise to the size effect phenomenon. Furthermore, a new approach is developed to predict the highest temperature in the primary shear zone by numerical fitting.

Keywords

Size effect Thermal gradient Specific cutting energy Material strengthening 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

Financial support is from NSFC (Grants no. 11402278).

References

  1. 1.
    Atkins AG (2009) The science and engineering of cutting. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mallock A (1881) The action of cutting tools. Proc R Soc Lond 33:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barry J, Byrne G, Lennon G (2001) Observations on chip formation and acoustic emission in machining Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1055–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00096-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang L, Yin J, Sun Y, Shen H, Gao C (2017) Chip formation mechanism in dry hard high-speed orthogonal turning of hardened AISI D2 tool steel with different hardness levels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:2341–2356.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0667-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaynak Y, Gharibi A, Ozkutuk M (2018) Experimental and numerical study of chip formation in orthogonal cutting of Ti-5553 alloy: the influence of cryogenic, MQL, and high pressure coolant supply. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:1411–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0904-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merchant ME (1945) Mechanics of the metal cutting process I: orthorgonal cutting and a type 2 chip. J Appl Phys 16:267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1707586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shaw MC (2005) Metabolic Syndrome—Do We Really Need a New Definition? In: Metal cutting principles, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2005.3.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkins AG (2003) Modelling metal cutting using modern ductile fracture mechanics: quantitative explanations for some longstanding problems. Int J Mech Sci 45:373–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00040-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin B, Wang L, Guo Y, Yao J (2016) Modeling of cutting forces in end milling based on oblique cutting analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:727–736.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7724-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flom DG, Komanduri R, Lee M (1984) High-speed machining of metals. Ann Rev Mater Sci 14:231–278.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.14.080184.001311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Longbottom JM, Lanham JD (2006) A review of research related to Salomon’s hypothesis on cutting speeds and temperatures. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1740–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cui X, Zhao B, Jiao F, Zheng J (2016) Chip formation and its effects on cutting force, tool temperature, tool stress, and cutting edge wear in high- and ultra-high-speed milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:55–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7539-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duan C, Zhang L (2013) A reliable method for predicting serrated chip formation in high-speed cutting: analysis and experimental verification. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 64:1587–1597.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4125-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang H, To S, Chan CY, Cheung CF, Lee WB (2010) Elastic strain induced shear bands in the microcutting process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang H, To S, Chan CY, Cheung CF, Lee WB (2011) Dynamic modelling of shear band formation and tool-tip vibration in ultra-precision diamond turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:512–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang J, Kalaitzidou K, Sutherland JW, Aifantis EC (2007) Validation of a predictive model for adiabatic shear band formation in chips produced via orthogonal machining. J Mech Behavior Mater 18:243–263Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Molinari A, Soldani X, Miguélez MH (2013) Adiabatic shear banding and scaling laws in chip formation with application to cutting of Ti-6Al-4V. J Mech Phys Solids 61:2331–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ye GG, Jiang MQ, Xue SF, Ma W, Dai LH (2018) On the instability of chip flow in high-speed machining. Mech Mater 116:104–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang T, Liu Z, Xu C (2015) Theoretical modeling and experimental validation of specific cutting force for micro end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:1433–1441.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6549-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Backer WR, Marshall ER, Shaw MC (1952) The size effect in metal cutting. J Manuf Sci Eng 74:61–72Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shaw MC (2003) The size effect in metal cutting. Sadhana 28:875–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pawade RS, Sonawane HA, Joshi SS (2009) An analytical model to predict specific shear energy in high-speed turning of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:979–990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lucca DA, Seo YW (1993) Effect of tool edge geometry on energy dissipation in ultraprecision machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Techn 42:83–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62397-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schimmel RJ, Endres WJ, Stevenson R (2002) Application of an internally consistent material model to determine the effect of tool edge geometry in orthogonal machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:536–543.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1448334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakayama K, Tamura K (1968) Size effect in metal-cutting force. J Eng Indus 90:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3604585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Subbiah S, Melkote SN (2006) The constant force component due to material separation and its contribution to the size effect in specific cutting energy. J Manuf Sci Eng 128:811–815.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2163363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shaw MC (1950) A quantized theory of strain hardening as applied to the cutting of metals. J Appl Phy 21:599–606.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Larsen-Basse J, Oxley PLB (1973) Effect of strain rate sensitivity on scale phenomena in chip formation. in: Proceedings of the 13th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, University of Birmingham, UK, pp. 209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fang N (2003) Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool part II: analysis of the size effect and the shear strain-rate. J Mech Phys Solids 51:743–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wu, JH, Liu, ZQ (2010) Modeling of flow stress in orthogonal micro-cutting process based on strain gradient plasticity theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:143–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2049-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Joshi SS, Melkote SN (2004) An explanation for the size-effect in machining using strain gradient plasticity. J Manuf Sci Eng 126:679–684.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1688375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu K, Melkote SN (2006) Material strengthening mechanisms and their contribution to size effect in micro-cutting. J Manuf Sci Eng 128:730–737.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2193548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fang F, Xu F, Lai M (2015) Size effect in material removal by cutting at nano scale. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:591–598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7032-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Komanduri R (1993) Machining and grinding: a historical review of the classical papers. App Mech Rev 46:80–132.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3121404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhu H, Zbib HM, Aifantis EC (1995) On the role of strain gradients in adiabatic shear banding. Acta Mech 111:111–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187731 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tsagrakis I, Aifantis EC (2015) On the effect of strain gradient on adiabatic shear banding. Metall Mater Trans A 46:4459–4467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2586-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tsagrakis I, Aifantis EC (2017) Shear banding instabilities in bulk metallic glasses at low strain rates: gradient and length scale effects. Rev Adv Mater Sci 48:156–169Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Huang J, Olson WW, Sutherland JW, Aifantis EC (1996) On the shear instability in chip formation in orthogonal machining. J Mech Behavior Mats 7:279–292Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang J, Aifantis EC (1997) A note on the problem of shear localization during chip formation in orthogonal machining. J Mater Engng Performance 6:25–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-997-0027-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kopalinsky E M, Oxley PLB (1984) Size effects in metal removal processes. in: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Mechanical Properties at High Rates of Strain. Institute of Physics Conference Series, Oxford, UK, pp. 389–396Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ye GG, Chen Y, Xue SF, Dai LH (2014) Critical cutting speed for onset of serrated chip flow in high speed machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 86:18–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2008) A new material model for 2D numerical simulation of serrated chip formation when machining titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:275–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pan H, Liu J, Choi Y, Xu C, Bai Y, Atkins T (2016) Zones of material separation in simulations of cutting. Int J Mech Sci 115:262–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aifantis EC (2014) Gradient material mechanics: perspectives and prospects. Acta Mech 225:999–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-013-1076-y MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aifantis EC (2016) Internal length gradient (ILG) material mechanics across scales and disciplines. Adv Appl Mech 49:1–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lee WS, Lin CF (1998) High-temperature deformation behaviour of Ti6Al4V alloy evaluated by high strain-rate compression tests. J Mater Process Technol 75:127–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00302-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oxley PLB (1989) Structure of the O-specific galactan from the lipopolysaccharide of the reference strain for Serratia marcescens serogroup O24. In: Mechanics of machining. Wiley, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(89)85094-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Burns TJ, Davies MA (1997) Nonlinear dynamics model for chip segmentation in machining. Phys Rev Lett 79:447–450.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sutter G, Ranc N (2007) Temperature fields in a chip during high-speed orthogonal cutting - an experimental investigation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1507–1517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vernaza-Pefia KM, Mason JJ, Li M (2002) Experimental study of the temperature field generated during orthogonal machining of an aluminum alloy. Exp Mech 42:221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering Mechanics, College of Pipeline and Civil EngineeringChina University of PetroleumQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations