Advertisement

Tearing criterion and process window of hot metal gas forming for AA6063 cylindrical stepped tubes

  • Mostafa Rajaee
  • Seyed Jamal Hosseinipour
  • Hamed Jamshidi Aval
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Hot metal gas forming (HMGF) with axial feeding presents unique features that enable the complex and further expansion of workpieces that are characterized by minimal defects, such as wrinkles and tears. In this study, the effects of process parameters on the HMGF of aluminum alloy 6063 for the production of cylindrical stepped tubes were investigated through experimental tests and finite element simulations. The effects of applied axial feeding, temperature, and pressure on the thickness distribution of specimens and the percentage of die filling were studied. Pressure and axial feeding were applied gradually with a linear increase over a period of 600 s. The second derivative of the specimens’ thickness strain with respect to time was used as a criterion for predicting tearing. The results were then used to plot the process window of HMGF. The obtained stress distributions showed that a gradual increase in gas pressure increased tensile stress in the forming zone, thereby facilitating the elimination of wrinkles created during axial feeding. Increasing temperature reduced the extent of successful deformation but decreased pressure, thus increasing the percentage of die filling.

Keywords

Hot metal gas forming FEM Process window Cylindrical stepped tube Tearing criteria AA6063 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nazzal MA, Abu Farha FK (2010) Finite element modeling of superplastic forming of tubular shapes. Key Eng Mater 433:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu-bin H, Jia W, Shi Y, Chun L (2008) Mechanical property and formability of AZ31B extruded tube at elevated temperature. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 18:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan-li L, Zhu-bin H, Shi-jian Y, Jia W (2011) Formability determination of AZ31B tube for IHPF process at elevated temperature. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 21(4):851–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter J, Krajewski P, Verma R (2008) The hot blow forming of AZ31 Mg sheet: formability assessment and application development. JOM 60:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu Y, Wu X (2007) Microstructure study on an AZ31 magnesium alloy tube after hot metal gas forming process. J Mater Eng Perform 16:354–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maeno T, Mori K, Adachi K (2014) Gas forming of ultra-high strength steel hollowpart using air filled into sealed tube and resistance heating. J Mater Process Technol 214(1):97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paula A, Strano M (2016) The influence of process variables on the gas forming and presshardening of steel tubes. J Mater Process Technol 228:160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vadillo L, Santos MT, Gutierrez MA, Pérez I, González B, Uthaisangsuk V (2007) Simulation and experimental results of the hot metal gas forming technology for high strength steel and stainless steel tubes forming. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on numerical methods in industrial forming processes. AIP Conf Proc 908:1199–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neugebauer R, Schieck F (2010) Active media-based form hardening of tubes and profiles. Prod Eng 4(4):385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu-bin H, Bu-gang T, Chang-yong C, Zhi-biao W, Kai-lun Z, Shi-jian Y (2012) Mechanical properties and formability of TA2 extruded tube for hot metal gas forming at elevated temperature. Trans Nonferrous Metals 22:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu G, Wu Y, Wang D, Yuan S (2015) Effect of feeding length on deforming behavior of Ti-3Al-2.5 V tubular components prepared by tube gas forming at elevated temperature. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(9–12):1809–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu G, Wang KH, Xu Y, Wang B, Yuan SJ (2013) An approach to improve thickness uniformity of TA15 tubular part formed by gas bulging process. Adv Mater Res 712-715:651–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu G, Wang JL, Dang KX, Tang ZJ (2014) High pressure pneumatic forming of Ti-3Al-2.5V titanium tubes in a square crosssectional die. Materials 7:5992–6009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu Y, Liu G, Wang K, Liu Z, Yuan S (2017) The deformation and microstructure of Ti-3Al-2.5V tubular component for non-uniform temperature hot gas forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5–8):2143–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu Y, Liu G, Wang K, Liu Z, Yuan S (2016) Loading path and microstructure study of Ti-3Al-2.5V tubular components within hot gas forming at 800 °C. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5–8):1823–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin Y, Zhang K, He Z, Fan X, Yan Y, Yuan S (2018) Constitutive modeling of the high-temperature flow behavior of a-Ti alloy tube. J Mater Eng Perform 27:2475–2483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keigler M, Bauer H, Harrison D, De Silva AKM (2005) Enhancing the formability of aluminium components via temperature controlled hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 167:363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu J, Tan M, Aue-u-lan Y, Jarfors A, Fong K, Castagne S (2011) Superplastic-like forming of non-superplastic AA5083 combined with mechanical pre-forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(1–4):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu J, Tan MJ, Lim CVS, Chua BW (2013) Process optimization and microstructural development during superplastic-like forming of AA5083. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):2415–2422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim WJ, Kim WY, Kim HK (2010) Hot-air forming of Al-Mg-Cr alloy and prediction of failure based on Zener-Holloman parameter. Met Mater Int 16(6):895–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu-bin H, Xiao-bo F, Fei S, Kai-lun Z, Zhi-biao W, Shi-jian Y (2012) Formability and microstructure of AA6061 Al alloy tube for hot metal gas forming at elevated temperature. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22:364–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maeno T, Mori K, Fujimoto K (2014) Hot gas bulging of sealed aluminum alloy tube using resistance heating. Manuf Rev 1(5):1–6Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maeno T, Mori K, Unou C (2011) Optimisation of condition in hot gas bulging of aluminium alloy tube using resistance heating set into dies. Key Eng Mater 473:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shamsi-Sarband A, Hosseinipour SJ, Bakhshi-Jooybari M, Shakeri M (2013) The effect of geometric parameters of conical cups on the preform shape in two-stage superplastic forming process. J Mater Eng Perform 22(12):3601–3611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hojjati MH, Zoorabadi M, Hosseinipour SJ (2008) Optimization of superplastic hydroforming process of Aluminium alloy 5083. J Mater Process Technol 205(1–3):482–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    El-Morsy A, Akkus N, Manabe K, Nishimura H (2006) Evaluation of superplastic characteristics of tubular materials by multi-tube bulge test. Mater Lett 60(4):559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Drezet JM, Phillion AB (2010) As-cast residual stresses in an aluminum alloy AA6063 billet: neutron diffraction measurements and finite element modeling. J Metall Mater Trans 41(13):3396–3404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pepelnjak T, Petek A (2005) Prediction of material necking in digital enviroment. J Technol Plasticity 30(1–2):13–23Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pepelnjak T, Petek A, Kuzman K (2005) Analyses of the forming limit diagram in digital environment. Adv Mater Res 6-8:697–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moslemi M, Hosseinipour SJ, Hosseini ME and A.H. Gorji, (2011) A comparison between three numerical criteria for prediction the forming limit diagram of St14 steel, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP: 173–179Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kadkhodayan M, Aleyasin H (2015) An experimental and numerical study of forming limit diagram of low carbon steel sheets. J Solid Mech 7(2):146–157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mostafa Rajaee
    • 1
  • Seyed Jamal Hosseinipour
    • 1
  • Hamed Jamshidi Aval
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Materials Forming Research CenterBabol Noshirvani University of TechnologyBabolIran

Personalised recommendations