Advertisement

Evaluation of the superabsorbent coolant as a new approach to semi-dry machining

  • Yousef ShokoohiEmail author
  • José Mario Paiva
  • German Fox-Rabinovich
  • Carlos Alberto Schuch Bork
  • Stephen Clarence Veldhuis
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

This work presents a novel coolant suitable for different machining processes. The focus of this study is applying superabsorbent coolant (SAC) during milling of hardened H13 steel and evaluating the possibility of utilizing superabsorbent material as a coolant and comparing with dry and flood conditions. The use of SAC is a novel method of semi-dry machining that proves the performance of hydrogels as a coolant and opens a new window for industrial applications. The main purpose besides improving machining performance is that a suitable condition has been provided to use benefits of nanoparticles (higher thermal conductivity and lubricity) safely and prevent distribution of nanoparticles and other chemical additives in the air which can cause serious occupational and environmental problems as well. The results of machining studies indicate that SAC can considerably reduce cutting force, improve surface integrity, and increase tool life. In addition, the friction conditions at the cutting zone have been improved. The results show a lower surface roughness of the chip surface.

Keywords

Cutting fluids Coolant Machining Superabsorbent Hydrogel Nanoparticle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank McMaster Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI) for providing the technical support for this project, Heera Marway, a research engineer in the MMRI, for his valuable help and suggestions, and Jennifer Anderson for her help with editing the document.

Funding information

This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under the CANRIMT Strategic Research Network Grant NETGP 479639-15.

References

  1. 1.
    Reddy NSK, Rao PV (2006) Experimental investigation to study the effect of solid lubricants on cutting forces and surface quality in end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yildiz Y, Nalbant M (2008) A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:947–964.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaw MC (2005) Metal cutting principles, second. Oxford university press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vasu V, Reddy GPK (2011) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication with Al2O3 nanoparticles on surface roughness, tool wear and temperature dissipation in machining Inconel 600 alloy. Proc Inst Mech Eng , Part N J Nanoeng Nanosyst 225:3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1740349911427520 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davim JP (2013) Green manufacturing processes and systems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar M, Gauravdeep G (2015) Experimental investigation of machining AISI 1040 medium carbon steel under cryogenic machining : a comparison with dry machining. J Inst Eng Ser C 96:373–379.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-015-0178-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klocke F, Lung D, Cayli T, Döbbeler B, Sangermann H (2014) Evaluation of energy efficiency in cutting aerospace materials with high-pressure cooling lubricant supply. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15:1179–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0454-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ribeiro M, Vieira JT, De Oliveira JA et al (2017) Comparison among different vegetable fluids used in minimum quantity lubrication systems in the tapping process of cast aluminum alloy. J Clean Prod 140:1255–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suresh N, Reddy K, Nouari M, Yang M (2010) Development of electrostatic solid lubrication system for improvement in machining process performance. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:789–797.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shokoohi Y, Khosrojerdi E, Rassolian B (2015) Machining and ecological effects of a new developed cutting fluid in combination with different cooling techniques on turning operation. J Clean Prod 94:330–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM (2009) Cooling techniques for improved productivity in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:435–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Venugopal KA, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB (2007) Growth of tool wear in turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy under cryogenic cooling. Wear 262:1071–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bermingham MJ, Palanisamy S, Kent D, Dargusch MS (2012) A comparison of cryogenic and high pressure emulsion cooling technologies on tool life and chip morphology in Ti – 6Al – 4V cutting. J Mater Process Technol 212:752–765.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaynak Y (2014) Evaluation of machining performance in cryogenic machining of Inconel 718 and comparison with dry and MQL machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:919–933.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5683-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhushan B (2013) Principles and applications of tribology, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Srivastava AS (2014) Effect of solid lubricant on surface quality in turning of Al 6061 alloy. In: ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical EngineersGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mijanovic K, Sokovic M (2001) Ecological aspects of the cutting fluids and its influence on quantifiable parameters of the cutting processes. J Mater Process Technol 109:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brinksmeier E, Meyer D, Huesmann-cordes AG, Herrmann C (2015) Metalworking fluids — mechanisms and performance. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64:605–628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53:511–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M, Demirbas E, Simsek BT (2013) Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design of experiments. J Clean Prod 42:159–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shokoohi Y, Shekarian E (2016) Application of nanofluids in machining processes - a review. J Nanosci Technol 2:59–63Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liao YS, Lin HM, Chen YC (2007) Feasibility study of the minimum quantity lubrication in high-speed end milling of NAK80 hardened steel by coated carbide tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1667–1676.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Jia D, Yang M, Zhang N, Wu Q, Han Z, Sun K (2017) Heat transfer performance of MQL grinding with different nanofluids for Ni-based alloys using vegetable oil. J Clean Prod 154:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soo J, Lee P, Won S (2011) Experimental characterization of micro-drilling process using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:649–652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winter M, Bock R, Herrmann C, Stache H, Wichmann H, Bahadir M (2012) Technological evaluation of a novel glycerol based biocide-free metalworking fluid. J Clean Prod 35:176–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grosse T, Winter M, Baron S, Hoffmeister HW, Herrmann C, Dröder K (2015) Honing with polymer based cutting fluids. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 11:89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2015.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Senevirathne SWMAI, Fernando MAR V (2012) Effect of cryogenic cooling on machining performance on hard to cut metals - a literature review. In: Proc. National Engineering ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saidur R, Leong KY, Mohammad HA (2011) A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:1646–1668.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Byers JP (2006) Metalworking fluids, second. Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kabiri K, Omidian H, Doroudiani S et al (2011) Superabsorbent hydrogel composites and nanocomposites : a review. Polym Compos 32:277–289.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.21046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shokoohi Y, Khosrojerdi E, Shekarian E (2015) The effects of concentration of cutting fluids on machining performance during end milling of steel St60. Mech Ind 17:407.  https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2015068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dhar NR, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB (2001) The influence of cryogenic cooling on tool wear , dimensional accuracy and surface finish in turning AISI 1040 and E4340C steels. Wear 249:932–942.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00825-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2015) Machining of hardened steel - experimental investigations, performance modeling and cooling techniques: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:95–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koshy P, Dewes RC, Aspinwall DK (2002) High speed end milling of hardened AISI D2 tool steel (∼58 HRC). J Mater Process Technol 127:266–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00155-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Charles H. Spink (2008), Differential Scanning Calorimetry, Methods in Cell Biology, vol 84. Academic Press, pp 115–141,  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84005-2
  36. 36.
    Sharma AK, Tiwari AK, Dixit AR (2016) Effects of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in machining processes using conventional and nanofluid based cutting fluids: a comprehensive review. J Clean Prod 127:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chou YK (2002) Surface hardening of AISI 4340 steel by machining: a preliminary investigation. J Mater Process Technol 124:171–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00132-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sanchez JA, Pombo I, Alberdi R, Izquierdo B, Ortega N, Plaza S, Martinez-Toledano J (2010) Machining evaluation of a hybrid MQL-CO 2 grinding technology. J Clean Prod 18:1840–1849.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ginta TL (2009) Improved tool life in end milling Ti-6Al-4V through workpiece preheating. Eur J Sci Res 27:384–391Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yousef Shokoohi
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Mario Paiva
    • 1
    • 2
  • German Fox-Rabinovich
    • 1
  • Carlos Alberto Schuch Bork
    • 1
    • 3
  • Stephen Clarence Veldhuis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceCatholic University of Santa CatarinaCentro JoinvilleBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFederal Institute Sul-rio-grandenseSapucaia do SulBrazil

Personalised recommendations