Experimental study on the variance of mechanical properties of polyamide 6 during multi-layer sintering process in selective laser sintering

  • Zhicheng Ling
  • Jinzhe Wu
  • Xiang WangEmail author
  • Xiaofeng Li
  • Jinjin Zheng


During the selective laser sintering layer-by-layer manufacturing process, many factors such as the ambient temperature and the densification effect will influence the mechanical properties of sintered specimens. In the experimental study, the porosity ratio, crystallinity, and tensile strength of sintered specimens with different ambient temperatures and layers were analyzed. The results indicated that when the ambient temperature rose from 25 to 180 °C, the average porosity ratio decreased from 60% at 25 °C to 39.7–38.7% at 140–180 °C; the relative crystallinity and tensile strength reached a maximum value of 34% and 10 MPa at 140 °C with the same number of sintered layers. According to the measurement of sintered specimens with different layers, the porosity ratio rapidly reduced by 21% from 3 to 10 layers, and the tensile strength improved by 22.5 MPa. When the number of sintered layers reached 10, the change of the porosity ratio and tensile strength were relatively slow, and it would almost disappear as the number of layers exceeded 14. The results showed that the densification process and energy accumulation effect were beneficial to reduce the porosity ratio of specimens, thereby improving its tensile strength in the early period of laser sintering.


Selective laser sintering Layer-by-layer sintering Tensile strength Porosity ratio Crystallinity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The technical assistance from State Key Laboratory (USTC) is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding information

This study received financial support from the Key Research and Development Program of Anhui (grant number 1704a0902051).


  1. 1.
    Jacobs PF (1992) Rapid prototyping & manufacturing: fundamentals of stereolithography. Society of Manufacturing EngineersGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bourell DL, Marcus HL, Barlow JW, Beaman JJ (1992) Selective laser sintering of metals and ceramics. Int J Powder Metall 28(4):369–381Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eshraghi S, Das S (2010) Mechanical and microstructural properties of polycaprolactone scaffolds with one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional orthogonally oriented porous architectures produced by selective laser sintering. Acta Biomater 6(7):2467–2476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chacón JM, Caminero MA, García-Plaza E, Núñez PJ (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mägi P, Krumme A, Pohlak M (2016) Recycling of PA-12 in additive manufacturing and the improvement of its mechanical properties. Key Eng Mater 674:9–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karimi P, Raza T, Andersson J, Svensson LE (2017) Influence of laser exposure time and point distance on 75-μm-thick layer of selective laser melted alloy 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5–8):2199–2207. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feng Q, Tang Q, Liu Y, Setchi R, Soe S, Ma S, Bai L (2017) Quasi-static analysis of mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5–8):2301–2313. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fayed EM, Elmesalamy AS, Sobih M, Elshaer Y (2017) Characterization of direct selective laser sintering of alumina. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5–8):2333–2341. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu W, Yan C, Shi Y, Wen S, Liu J, Shi Y (2015) Investigation into mechanical and microstructural properties of polypropylene manufactured by selective laser sintering in comparison with injection molding counterparts. Mater Des 82:37–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lisi Leite J, Salmoria GV, Paggi RA, Ahrens CH, Pouzada AS (2011) Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of functionally graded PA12/HDPE parts by selective laser sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(5–8):583–591. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salmoria GV, Ahrens CH, Klauss P, Paggi RA, Oliveira RG, Lago A (2007) Rapid manufacturing of polyethylene parts with controlled pore size gradients using selective laser sintering. Mater Res 10(2):211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim J, Creasy TS (2004) Selective laser sintering characteristics of nylon 6/clay-reinforced nanocomposite. Polym Test 23(6):629–636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salmoria GV, Leite JL, Vieira LF, Pires ATN, Roesler CRM (2012) Mechanical properties of PA6/PA12 blend specimens prepared by selective laser sintering. Polym Test 31(3):411–416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zarringhalam H, Majewski C, Hopkinson N (2009) Degree of particle melt in nylon-12 selective laser-sintered parts. Rapid Prototyp J 15(2):126–132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zarringhalam H, Hopkinson N, Kamperman NF, de Vlieger JJ (2006) Effects of processing on microstructure and properties of SLS nylon 12. Mater Sci Eng A 435-436:172–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou W, Wang X, Hu J, Zhu X (2013) Melting process and mechanics on laser sintering of single layer polyamide 6 powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1–4):901–908. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cavazzuti M (2013) Design of experiments. In: Optimization methods. Springer, pp 13–42Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu H (2013) Application of orthogonal experimental design for the automatic software testing. In: Appl Mech Mater. Trans Tech Publ, pp 812–818Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ren JW, Dong LJ (2012) Effect of process parameters on residual thermal stress in laser sintering process. Innovation and Sustainability of Modern Railway 551–556Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mercelis P, Kruth JP (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12(5):254–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fischer C, Seefried A, Drummer D (2017) Crystallization and component properties of polyamide 12 at processing-relevant cooling conditions. Polym Eng Sci 57(4):450–457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang X, Yang G, Lin J (2006) Crystallization behavior of nylon 11/montmorillonite nanocomposites under annealing. J Appl Polym Sci 102(6):5483–5489. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dadbakhsh S, Verbelen L, Verkinderen O, Strobbe D, Van Puyvelde P, Kruth J-P (2017) Effect of PA12 powder reuse on coalescence behaviour and microstructure of SLS parts. Eur Polym J 92:250–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang X, Li YB, Zuo Y, Lv GY, Mu YH (2006) Influences of the crystallization behavior of n-HA reinforced PA66 biocomposite on its mechanical properties. Mater Sci Forum 510-511:898–901. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coniglio N, Sivarupan T, El Mansori M (2017) Investigation of process parameter effect on anisotropic properties of 3D printed sand molds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5–8):2175–2185. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu S, Huang A, Chi Z, Xu J, Economy J (2011) Phase stability and melting behavior of the α and γ phases of nylon 6. J Appl Polym Sci 120(4):1885–1891. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhicheng Ling
    • 1
  • Jinzhe Wu
    • 1
  • Xiang Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaofeng Li
    • 1
  • Jinjin Zheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Precision Mechanic and Precision InstrumentationUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations