Advertisement

Entrance shape design of spread extrusion die for large-scale aluminum panel

  • Zhiwen LiuEmail author
  • Luoxing Li
  • Jie Yi
  • Guan Wang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The entrance shape of spread die plays a crucial role in the quality control of large-scale aluminum panel production. The conventional design of spread die is generally based on the experience and expertise of the die designers or costly plant trials. Thus, it is difficult to guarantee the material flow through subsequent feeder die with the same velocity and ensure the die strength. In this work, the extrusion processes of three spread dies with different entrance shapes used generally in the real extrusion production for large-scale aluminum panel were investigated by FE simulations. Firstly, 3D-FE models for simulating the extrusion processes of the three spread dies were established by using HyperXtrude software based on ALE algorithm. Then, the effects of different die designs on the material flow behavior, extrusion load, temperature, residual stress distribution, and die deflection were synthetically studied by analyzing and comparing the simulated results. Finally, the optimal die was manufactured and corresponding extrusion experiment was carried out on a 2600-t extrusion press. The simulation and experimental results show that the die 2 with fan-shaped entrance was the optimum one among the three spread dies, where the minimum required extrusion load, uniform flow velocity at the die exit, minimum residual stress in extruded profile, and minimum die deflection were obtained. This study could provide effective guidance on the entrance shape design of spread extrusion die for the large-scale aluminum panel.

Keywords

Large-scale aluminum panel Spread extrusion die Entrance shape ALE algorithm Simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge research support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. U1664252, 51605234), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacture for Vehicle Body (grant no. 31715011), and the Science and Technology Program of Hengyang (grant no. 2017KJ292).

References

  1. 1.
    Gagliardi F, Ciancio C, Ambrogio G (2018) Optimization of porthole die extrusion by Grey-Taguchi relational analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1–4):719–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakhtiani T, El-Mounayri H, Zhang J (2017) Modeling of extrusion process of a condenser tube for investigating the effects of mandrel geometry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(9–12):3237–3252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iqbal UM, Kumar VSS, Gopalakannan S (2016) Application of response surface methodology in optimizing the process parameters of twist extrusion process for AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy. Measurement 94:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen L, Zhao G, Yu J, Zhang W (2015) Evaluation of a pyramid die extrusion for a hollow aluminum profile using FE simulation. J Mech Sci Technol 29(5):2195–2203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xie JX, Murakami T, Ikeda K, Takahashi H (1995) Experimental simulation of metal flow in porthole-die extrusion. J Mater Process Technol 49(1–2):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang C, Yang S, Wang C, Zhao G, Gao A, Wang L (2016) Numerical and experimental investigation on thermo-mechanical behavior during transient extrusion process of high-strength 7××× aluminum alloy profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5–8):1915–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu Z, Li L, Yi J, Li S, Wang G (2017) Influence of extrusion speed on the seam weld quality in the porthole die extrusion of AZ31 magnesium alloy tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1–4):1039–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ji H, Nie H, Chen W, Ruan X, Pan P, Zhang J (2017) Optimization of the extrusion die and microstructure analysis for a hollow aluminum alloy profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(9–12):3461–3471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    He Z, Wang H, Wang M, Li G (2012) Simulation of extrusion process of complicated aluminium profile and die trial. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22(7):1732–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee GA, Kwak DY, Kim SY, IM YT (2002) Analysis and design of flat-die hot extrusion process 1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Mech Sci 44(5):915–934CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee GA, Im YT (2002) Analysis and die design of flat-die hot extrusion process 2. Numerical design of bearing lengths. Int J Mech Sci 44(5):935–946CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang C, Zhao G, Guan Y, Gao A, Wang L, Li P (2015) Virtual tryout and optimization of the extrusion die for an aluminum profile with complex cross-sections. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:927–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun X, Zhao G, Zhang C, Guan Y, Gao A (2013) Optimal design of second-step welding chamber for a condenser tube extrusion die based on the response surface method and the genetic algorithm. Mater Manuf Process 28(7):823–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang C, Yang S, Zhang Q, Zhao G, Li P, Sun W (2017) Automatic optimization design of a feeder extrusion die with response surface methodology and mesh deformation technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9–12):3181–3193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu P, Xie S, Cheng L (2012) Die structure optimization for a large, multi-cavity aluminum profile using numerical simulation and experiments. Mater Des 36:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen L, Zhao G, Yu J, Zhang W, Wu T (2014) Analysis and porthole die design for a multi-hole extrusion process of a hollow, thin-walled aluminum profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(1–4):383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dong Y, Zhang C, Luo W, Yang S, Zhao G (2016) Material flow analysis and extrusion die modifications for an irregular and multitooth aluminum alloy radiator. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5–8):1927–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abrinia K, Makaremi M (2009) An analytical solution for the spread extrusion of shaped sections. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(7):670–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Imamura Y, Takatsuji N, Matsuki K, Tokizawa M, Murotani K, Maruyama H (1999) Metal flow behaviour of wide flat bar in the spreading extrusion process. Mater Sci Technol 15(10):1186–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang D, Zhang C, Wang C, Zhao G, Chen L, Sun W (2018) Application and analysis of spread die and flat container in the extrusion of a large-size, hollow, and flat-wide aluminum alloy profile. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(9–12):4247–4263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu Z, Li L, Li S, Yi J, Wang G (2018) Simulation analysis of porthole die extrusion process and die structure modifications for an aluminum profile with high length–width ratio and small cavity. Materials 11(9):1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun YD, Chen QR, Sun WJ (2015) Numerical simulation of extrusion process and die structure optimization for a complex magnesium doorframe. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1–4):495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sellars CM, Tegart WJMG (1972) Hot workability. Int Metal Rev 17(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flitta I, Sheppard T (2003) Nature of friction in extrusion process and its effect on material flow. Mater Sci Technol 19(7):837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of South ChinaHengyangChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacture for Vehicle BodyHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations