Advertisement

A computer-aided system for multi-gate gating-system design for die-casting dies

  • Ranjit Singh
  • Jatinder MadanEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Current practices in the industry require significant involvement of die-casting experts who have to consider industry best practices and knowledge of process physics besides reference to a number of databases is also required making it very time consuming and cumbersome exercise. The die-casting industry therefore requires a system that could help relieve the die-casting expert from manual and time consuming tasks to design a good gating system. A computer-aided system for multi-gate gating system design for die-casting die is presented in this paper. The working of the system is supported by part, process, machine, and material information which is called input information. The system works in three major steps called modules of the system. The first module deals with the determination of die-casting process parameters. This module helps the user in determination of cavity fill time, gate velocity, and selection of die-casting machine automatically from the input information. The second module deals with the computer-aided determination of gating system parameters like gate thickness, gate length, runner length etc., by using input information. The last module of the system uses the parameters obtained from the second module to generate CAD models of the gating system by updating gating system features from feature library. The system was implemented in MATLAB. The proposed system is capable of designing gating system for die-casting parts requiring multiple gates. The system has been tested on example die-casting parts, and the results obtained from the system are as per industry practice.

Keywords

Die-casting Die-design Process parameters Gating-system design Multi-gates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is a revised and extended version of previous paper of the authors titled ‘A systematic approach for computer-aided gating-system design for die casting dies’ communicated at ASME 2016 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC) held during June 27–July 11, 2016, at Blacksburg, Virginia [31]. The authors are thankful to the organizers of the conference and the reviewers for providing valuable suggestions that helped improve the paper. The authors are also thankful to HGI Automotives Pvt. Ltd. Faridabad, India and Rockman Industries Ltd., Ludhiana, India, for their cooperation and support in the present research work.

Funding source

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. 1.
    Sulaiman S, Keen TC (1997) Flow analysis along the runner and gating-system of a casting process. J Mater Process Technol 63:690–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hu BH, Tong KK, Niu XP, Pinwill I (2000) Design and optimization of runner and gating systems for the die-casting of thin-walled magnesium telecommunication parts through numerical simulation. J Mater Process Technol 105:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim CH, Kwon TH (2001) A runner - gate system for die casting dies. Mater Manuf Process 16:789–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuh JYH, Wu SH, Lee KS (2002) Development of semi-automated die-casting die design system. Proc Instn Mech Engrs, Part B J Eng Manuf 216:1557–1588Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu SH, Fuh JYH, Lee KS (2007) Semi-automated parametric design of gating systems for die-casting die. Comput Ind Eng 53(2):222–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim YC, Kang CS, Cho JI, Jeong CY, Choi SW, Hong SK (2008) Die-casting Mold Design of the Thin-walled Aluminum Case by computational solidification simulation. J Mater Sci Technol 24(3):383–388Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    NADCA, “Die-casting glossary,” NADCA, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.diecasting.org/faq/. [Accessed: 19-Jan-2010]
  8. 8.
    “SolidWorks.” [Online]. Available: http://www.solidworks.in/sw/products/3d-cad/packages.htm. [Accessed: 26-Jun-2013]
  9. 9.
    PTC, “No Title,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.ptc.com/en/products/cad. [Accessed: 17-Feb-2018]
  10. 10.
    “CATIA.” [Online]. Available: http://www.3ds.com/products/catia/. [Accessed: 03-Jul-2013]
  11. 11.
    c3p, “No Title,” 2018. [Online]. Available: ref: http://www.cast-designer.com/casting-solutions/cast-designer-for-die-casting/gating-system-design-hpdc. [Accessed: 17-Feb-2018]
  12. 12.
    Huang TS (2008) Algorithms for recognizing undercut feature. J Technol 23(1):61–69Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singh R, Madan J (2013) Systematic approach for automated determination of parting line for die-cast parts. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29:346–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh R, Madan J, Kumar R (2014) Automated identification of complex undercut features for side-core design for die-casting parts. Proc IMechE Part B J Eng Manuf 228(9):1138–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tan ST, Yuen MF, Sze WS, Kwong KW (1990) Parting lines and parting surfaces of injection moulded parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 204(4):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wong T, Tan ST, Sze WS (1998) Parting line formation by slicing a 3D CAD model. Eng Comput 14:330–343CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li W, Martin RR, Langbein FC (2009) Molds for meshes: computing smooth parting lines and undercut removal. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 6(3):423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khardekar R and McMains S (2009) “Efficient computation of a near-optimal primary parting line,” in Joint conference on geometric and physical modeling (SPM ‘09), pp. 319–324Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madan J, Rao PVM, Kundra TK (2007) Die-casting feature recognition for automated parting direction and parting line determination. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 7(3):236–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sunil VB, Pande SS (2008) Automatic recognition of features from freeform surface CAD models. Comput Des 40(4):502–517Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Madan J, Singh A, and Kumar S (2008) “Recognition of intersecting features and identification of separable regions for design-manufacturing integration,” in Proceedings of the international conference on digital factory, pp. 60–67Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kumar N, Ranjan R, Tiwari MK (2007) Recognition of undercut feature and parting surface of moulded parts using polyhedron face adjacency graph. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(1–2):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lu HY, Lee WB (2000) Detection of interference elements and release direction in die-cast and injection-moulded components. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 214:431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ward M )2006) Gating manual. Wheeling, Illinois, USA: North American Die-casting AssociationGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar V and Madan J (2015) “A System for Computer-Aided Gating Design for Multi-Cavity Die-Casting Dies. ”Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng ManufGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johal AS, Khanna K, and Singh R (2013) “An automated system to determine gate parameters for die-casting dies,” in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Production and Industrial Engineering NIT Jalandhar India, 29th to 31st March. pp 176–183Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Singh CD, Madan J, Singh A (2013) Computer aided design of gating-system for a die-casting die. Int J Comput Appl Technol 46:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singh R, Kumar R, and Madan J (2016) “A systematic approach for computer-aided gating-system design for die casting dies,” in Proceedings of the ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference MSEC2016 2016, pp. MSEC2016–8768Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    El-Fotouh MRA, Shash AY, Gadallah MH (2018) Semi-automated gating system design with optimum gate and overflow positions for aluminum HPDC. In: Improved Performance of Materials. springer, Cham, pp 37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferencz P, Lucian G, Ioan S, Cristian C (2010) Studies concerning the design of the runner, gate and venting systems in the case of the high pressure die-casting technology. Ann oradea Univ fascicle Manag Technol Eng IX(XIX):3–177Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yen C, Lin JC, Li W, Huang MF (2006) An abductive neural network approach to the design of runner dimensions for the minimization of wrappage in injection mouldings. J Mater Process Technol 178(1–3):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hahn I, Hartmann G (2008) Automatic computerized optimization in die casting processes. Cast Plant Technol 4:54–61Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hsu F-Y, Jolly MR, Campbell J (2009) A multiple-gate runner system for gravity casting. J Mater Process Technol 209(17):5736–5750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim C-H, Kwon TH (2001) A runner–gate design system for die casting. Mater Manuf Process 16(6):789–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee BD, Baek UH, Han JW (2012) Optimization of gating-system design for die-casting of thin magnesium alloy-based multi-cavity LCD housing. J Mater Eng Perform 21:1893–1903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee KS, Lin JC (2006) Design of the runner and gating system parameters for a multi-cavity injection mould using FEM and neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27(11–12):1089–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lin JC (2002) Selection of the optimal gate location for a die-casting die with a freeform surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(4):278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tai CC, Lin JC (1999) The optimal position for the injection gate of a die-casting die. J Mater Process Technol 86(1):87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sun Z, Hu H, Chen X (2008) Numerical optimization of gating system parameters for a magnesium alloy casting with multiple performance characteristics. J Mater Process Technol 199(1–3):256–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Seong I, Jeong CK, Jin HY, Seo JDK, Kang CG (2016) Mold structure design and casting simulation of the high-pressure die casting for aluminum automotive clutch housing manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(5–8):1561–1572Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Armillotta A, Fasoli S, Guarinoni A (2016) Cold flow defects in zinc die casting: prevention criteria using simulation and experimental investigations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1–4):605–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Woon YK, Lee KS (2004) Development of a die design system for die casting. Adv Manuf Technol 23(5–6):399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSri Guru Granth Sahib World UniversityFatehgarh SahibIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chandigarh College of Engineering and Technology (Degree Wing)ChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations