Advertisement

Design, simulation, and hardware implementation of novel optimum operating point tracker of PV system using adaptive step size

  • Abdelhamid Loukriz
  • Sabir MessaltiEmail author
  • Abdelghani Harrag
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a novel maximum power point tracking (MPPT) strategy of photovoltaic system has been proposed and investigated. The suggested method is based on modified variable step-size perturbation and observation P&O strategy, which it can overcome several drawbacks and limitations of previous developed MPPT methods especially oscillations around the MPP, accuracy, and the convergence speed under rapidly changing atmospheric conditions. To demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method, both simulation model and experimental prototype have been developed and tested effectively using photovoltaic system based on Solarex MSX-60 panel and forward converter controlled by dsPIC30F2010 controller. Obtained results demonstrate that the proposed adaptive step-length perturbation and observation P&O strategy can offer many benefits compared to conventional P&O MPPT method and other methods developed previously in terms of low ripple, low overshoot, and low response time. The proposed adaptive step-size MPPT improves drastically the performances in static mode (oscillation reduction ratio around 75.00%) as well as in dynamic mode (convergence time reduction ratio around 91.67%) improving by the way the transferred available power.

Keywords

New modified P&O MPPT algorithm Variable step-size MPPT algorithm Tracking and accuracy of MPP Forward converter Implementation dspic30f2010 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Harrag A, Messalti S (2018) How fuzzy logic can improve PEM fuel cell MPPT performances? Int J Hydrog Energy 43(1):537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim IS, Kim MB, Youn MJ (2006) New maximum power point tracker using sliding-mode observer for estimation of solar array current in the grid-connected photovoltaic system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 53(4):1027–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    IEA (2018) Solar energy https://www.iea.org/topics/renewables/solar/. Retrieved the 31.10.2018 from Solar
  4. 4.
    Bulbul S, Ertugrul G, Arli F (2018) Investigation of usage potentials of global energy systems. Int Adv Res Eng J 2(1):58–67Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yuksel AN, Türkboyları EY (2018) Use of solar panels in green-house soil disinfection, Int Adv Res Eng J 2(2):195–199Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunnill S, Morrison D, Brugnetti I, Colla M, Valente A, Bikas H, Papakostas N (2014) Reconfigurable automated island for (dis)assembly of a variety of silicon solar cell geometries for specialist low power and CPV applications, EU PVSEC, 22–26 September, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mei Q, Shan M, Liu L, Guerrero JM (2011) A novel improved variable step-size incremental-resistance MPPT method for PV systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(6):2427–2434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunnill S, Brugnetti I, Colla M, Valente A, Bikas H, Papakostas N (2015) Flexible automated island for (dis)assembly of a variety of silicon solar cell geometries for specialist solar products, (WIRN 2015), 25th Italian workshop on neural networks, 20–22 May, Salerno, Italy Available OnlineGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Femia N, Petrone G, Spagnuolo G, Vitelli M (2005) Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method. IEEE Trans Power Electron 20(4):963–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang C, Zhao D (2009) MPPT with asymmetric fuzzy control for photovoltaic system, IEEE 4th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications ICIEA, Xi’an, China pp. 2180–2183Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishaque K, Salam Z, Amjad M, Mekhilef S An improved particle swarm optimization (PSO)–based MPPT for PV with reduced steady-state oscillation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(8):3627–3638Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Messalti S, Harrag A, Loukriz A 2015 A new neural networks MPPT controller for PV systems, 2015 6th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrag A, Messalti S Variable step size modified P&O MPPT algorithm using GAbased hybrid offline/online PID controller Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 49:1247–1260Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loukriz A, Haddadi M, Messalti S (2015) Simulation and experimental design of a new advanced variable step size incremental conductance MPPT algorithm for PV systems ISA Trans 1–9Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kattingal S, Vigneshkumar V, Sankar P, Simon SP, Rao Nayak PS, Palani S (2016) Development of an improved P&O algorithm assisted through a colony of foraging ants for MPPT in PV system. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 12(1)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohanty S, Subudhi B, Ray PK (2016) A new MPPT design using grey wolf optimization technique for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 7(1):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Montoya DG, Ramos-Paja CA, Giral R (2016) Improved design of sliding-mode controllers based on the requirements of MPPT techniques. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(1):235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hua CC, Fang YH, Chen WT (2016) Hybrid maximum power point tracking method with variable step size for photovoltaic systems. IET Renew Power Gener 10(2):127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bounechba H, Bouzid A, Snani H, Lashab A (2016) Real time simulation of MPPT algorithms for PV energy system. Electr Power Energy Syst 83:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Masmoudi F, Ben Salem F, Derbel N (2016) Single and double diode models for conventional mono-crystalline solar cell with extraction of internal parameters, 13th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD).  https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2016.7473725
  21. 21.
    Sally JD, Sally P (2007) Pythagorean triples. Roots to research: a vertical development of mathematical problems. American Mathematical Society Bookstore, ProvidenceCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohammed SA, Song C, Ahmed E, Maja H, Yan J, Frank M, Fengfeng T (2013) A high-power-density dc–dc converter for distributed PV architectures. IEEE J Photovoltaics 3(2):791–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li W, Fan L, Zhao Y, He X, Xu D, Wu B (2012) High-step-up and high-efficiency fuel-cell power-generation system with active­clamp flyback-forward converter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 59(1):599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Veerachary M (2011) Fourth-order buck converter for maximum power point tracking applications. IEEE Trans Aerosp and Electron Syst 47:896–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olalla C, Deline C, Maksimovic D (2014) Performance of mismatched PV systems with sub-module integrated converters. IEEE J Photovoltaics 4(1):396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdelhamid Loukriz
    • 1
  • Sabir Messalti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdelghani Harrag
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.ENP Polytechnic SchoolEl-HarrachAlgeria
  2. 2.Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of TechnologyMsila UniversityMsilaAlgeria
  3. 3.CCNS Laboratory, Electronics Department, Faculty of TechnologyFerhat Abbas UniversitySetifAlgeria

Personalised recommendations