Advertisement

Process robustness and strength analysis of multi-layered dissimilar joints using ultrasonic metal welding

  • Abhishek DasEmail author
  • Iain Masters
  • David Williams
Open Access
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of process parameters on the joint strength and process robustness when multi-layered joints of dissimilar metals are produced by ultrasonic metal welding (UMW). Three layers of 0.3-mm aluminium sheet are welded with a single 1.0-mm copper sheet which is representative of electric vehicle battery interconnects. A process robustness study in which welding pressure, amplitude of vibration and welding time are varied to produce satisfactory welds is reported. The weld quality is evaluated by performing lap shear and T-peel tests where maximum loads are considered as the quality indicator. Response surfaces are developed to identify the relationship and sensitivity between the input process parameters and output quality indicators. A feasible weldability zone is defined for the first time by identifying the under-weld, good-weld and over-weld conditions based on load-displacement curves and corresponding failure modes. Relying on the weldability zone and response surfaces, multi-objective optimisation is performed to obtain maximum lap shear and T-peel strength which resulted in Pareto frontier or trade-off curve between both objectives. An optimal joint is selected from the Pareto front which is verified and validated by performing confirmation experiments, and further, used for T-peel strength analysis of different interfaces of the multi-layered joint. To conclude, this paper determines both the optimal weld parameters and the robust operating range.

Keywords

Ultrasonic metal welding Automotive battery interconnects Joint strength Process robustness Response surface methodology Feasible weldability zone 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is partially supported by the WMG Centre High Value Manufacturing (HVM) Catapult at The University of Warwick.

References

  1. 1.
    Shakil M, Tariq NH, Ahmad M, Choudhary MA, Akhter JI, Babu SS (2014) Effect of ultrasonic welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar joints. Mater Des 55:263–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elangovan S, Prakasan K, Jaiganesh V (2010) Optimization of ultrasonic welding parameters for copper to copper joints using design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1):163–171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2627-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siddiq A, Ghassemieh E (2008) Thermomechanical analyses of ultrasonic welding process using thermal and acoustic softening effects. Mech Mater 40(12):982–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim TH, Yum J, Hu SJ, Spicer JP, Abell JA (2011) Process robustness of single lap ultrasonic welding of thin, dissimilar materials. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):17–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neppiras EA (1965) Ultrasonic welding of metals. Ultrasonics 3(3):128–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(65)80003-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bakavos D, Prangnell PB (2010) Mechanisms of joint and microstructure formation in high power ultrasonic spot welding 6111 aluminium automotive sheet. Mater Sci Eng A 527(23):6320–6334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.06.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SS, Kim TH, Hu SJ, Cai WW, Abell JA (2010) Joining technologies for automotive lithium-ion battery manufacturing: a review. In: ASME 2010 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Pennsylvania, USA, pp 541–549Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang CQ, Robson JD, Prangnell PB (2016) Dissimilar ultrasonic spot welding of aerospace aluminum alloy AA2139 to titanium alloy TiAl6V4. J Mater Process Technol 231:382–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ventrella VA, Berretta JR, de Rossi W (2010) Pulsed Nd:YAG laser seam welding of AISI 316L stainless steel thin foils. J Mater Process Technol 210(14):1838–1843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hirata Y (2003) Pulsed arc welding. Weld Int 17(2):98–115.  https://doi.org/10.1533/wint.2003.3075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brand MJ, Schmidt PA, Zaeh MF, Jossen A (2015) Welding techniques for battery cells and resulting electrical contact resistances. J Energy Storage 1:7–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2015.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Vries E (2004) Mechanics and mechanisms of ultrasonic metal welding. The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Das A, Li D, Williams D, Greenwood D (2018) Joining technologies for automotive battery systems manufacturing. World Electr Veh J 9(2):22.  https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj9020022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Annoni M, Carboni M (2011) Ultrasonic metal welding of AA 6022-T4 lap joints: part I – technological characterisation and static mechanical behaviour. Sci Technol Weld Join 16(2):107–115.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171810Y.0000000014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsuoka S-i, Imai H (2009) Direct welding of different metals used ultrasonic vibration. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):954–960.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matsuoka S-i (1994) Ultrasonic welding of ceramic/metal. J Mater Process Technol 47(1):185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(94)90094-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dinda SK, Basiruddin Sk M, Roy GG, Srirangam P (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of electron beam welded dissimilar steel to Fe–Al alloy joints. Mater Sci Eng A 677:182–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Russo Spena P, De Maddis M, Lombardi F, Rossini M (2016) Dissimilar resistance spot welding of Q&P and TWIP steel sheets. Mater Manuf Process 31(3):291–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1048476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mai TA, Spowage AC (2004) Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steel–kovar, copper–steel and copper–aluminium. Mater Sci Eng A 374(1):224–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Das A, Butterworth I, Masters I, Williams D (2018) Microstructure and mechanical properties of gap-bridged remote laser welded (RLW) automotive grade AA 5182 joints. Mater Charact 145:697–712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Briskham P, Blundell N, Han L, Hewitt R, Young K, Boomer D (2006) Comparison of self-pierce riveting, resistance spot welding and spot friction joining for aluminium automotive sheet. SAE Technical Paper,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li D, Chrysanthou A, Patel I, Williams G (2017) Self-piercing riveting-a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5–8):1777–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo JF, Chen HC, Sun CN, Bi G, Sun Z, Wei J (2014) Friction stir welding of dissimilar materials between AA6061 and AA7075 Al alloys effects of process parameters. Mater Des 56:185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Uzun H, Dalle Donne C, Argagnotto A, Ghidini T, Gambaro C (2005) Friction stir welding of dissimilar Al 6013-T4 to X5CrNi18-10 stainless steel. Mater Des 26(1):41–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faria R, Moura P, Delgado J, de Almeida AT (2012) A sustainability assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system. Energy Convers Manag 61:19–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Whittingham MS (2012) History, evolution, and future status of energy storage. Proc IEEE 100:0018–9219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shawn Lee S, Hyung Kim T, Jack Hu S, Cai WW, Abell JA, Li J (2013) Characterization of joint quality in ultrasonic welding of battery tabs. J Manuf Sci Eng 135 (2):021004–021004–021013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023364
  28. 28.
    Kong CY, Soar RC, Dickens PM (2005) A model for weld strength in ultrasonically consolidated components. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 219(1):83–91.  https://doi.org/10.1243/095440605X8315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Macwan A, Patel VK, Jiang XQ, Li C, Bhole SD, Chen DL (2014) Ultrasonic spot welding of Al/Mg/Al tri-layered clad sheets. Mater Des 62:344–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ni ZL, Ye FX (2016) Dissimilar joining of aluminum to copper using ultrasonic welding. Mater Manuf Process 31(16):2091–2100.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2016.1221101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang J, Cao B, He X, Luo H (2014) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Cu–Al joints by ultrasonic welding. Sci Technol Weld Join 19(6):500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haddadi F, Abu-Farha F (2016) The effect of interface reaction on vibration evolution and performance of aluminium to steel high power ultrasonic spot joints. Mater Des 89:50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patel VK, Bhole SD, Chen DL (2012) Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar welded Mg–Al joints by ultrasonic spot welding technique. Sci Technol Weld Join 17(3):202–206.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang SQ, Patel VK, Bhole SD, Wen GD, Chen DL (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrasonic spot welded Al/Ti alloy joints. Mater Des 78:33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Macwan A, Chen DL (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrasonic spot welded copper-to-magnesium alloy joints. Mater Des 84:261–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Janaki Ram GD, Yang Y, Stucker BE (2006) Effect of process parameters on bond formation during ultrasonic consolidation of aluminum alloy 3003. J Manuf Syst 25(3):221–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(07)80011-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kang B, Cai W, Tan C-A (2014) Vibrational energy loss analysis in battery tab ultrasonic welding. J Manuf Process 16(2):218–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kang B, Cai W, Tan C-A (2014) Dynamic stress analysis of battery tabs under ultrasonic welding. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(4):041011–041011.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee D, Kannatey-Asibu E, Cai W (2013) Ultrasonic welding simulations for multiple layers of lithium-ion battery tabs. J Manuf Sci Eng 135 (6):061011–061011–061013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025668
  40. 40.
    Shawn Lee S, Hyung Kim T, Jack Hu S, Cai WW, Abell JA (2015) Analysis of weld formation in multilayer ultrasonic metal welding using high-speed images. J Manuf Sci Eng 137 (3):031016–031016–031018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029787
  41. 41.
    Design Possibilities for the Chevy Bolt (2015) http://gm-volt.com/2015/06/19/design-possibilities-for-the-chevy-bolt/. Accessed 2017-07-05
  42. 42.
    Cai W, Blau PJ, Qu J (2013) Friction coefficients of battery metals and the usage in ultrasonic welding simulations. In: 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27), 17-20 Nov. 2013, pp 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1109/EVS.2013.6914778
  43. 43.
    Elangovan S, Semeer S, Prakasan K (2009) Temperature and stress distribution in ultrasonic metal welding—an FEA-based study. J Mater Process Technol 209(3):1143–1150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhang C, Li L (2009) A coupled thermal-mechanical analysis of ultrasonic bonding mechanism. Metall Mater Trans B 40(2):196–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-008-9224-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gunduz IE, Ando T, Shattuck E, Wong PY, Doumanidis CC (2005) Enhanced diffusion and phase transformations during ultrasonic welding of zinc and aluminum. Scr Mater 52(9):939–943.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kreye H. Melting phenomena in solid state welding processesGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Harthoorn J (1978) Ultrasonic metal welding. Technische Hogeschool EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Li J, Han L, Zhong J (2008) Short-circuit diffusion of ultrasonic bonding interfaces in microelectronic packaging. 40 (5):953–957.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.2840
  49. 49.
    Montgomery DC (2017) Design and analysis of experiments. John wiley & sons,Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rakić T, Kasagić-Vujanović I, Jovanović M, Jančić-Stojanović B, Ivanović D (2014) Comparison of full factorial design, central composite design, and box-Behnken design in chromatographic method development for the determination of fluconazole and its impurities. Anal Lett 47(8):1334–1347.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2013.867503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2009) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, vol 705. John Wiley & Sons,Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Alfeld P (1989) Scattered data interpolation in three or more variables A2 - LYCHE, TOM. In: Schumaker LL (ed) Mathematical methods in computer aided geometric design. Academic Press, pp 1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460515-2.50005-6
  53. 53.
    Fujita K, Kounoe Y (2006) High-order polynomial response surface with optimal selection of interaction terms. In: 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-7054
  54. 54.
    Gencsoy H, Adams J, Shin SJU (1967) On some fundamental problems in ultrasonic welding of dissimilar metals. Weld J 46(4):145-s 5 (4):274Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Satpathy MP, Moharana BR, Dewangan S, Sahoo SK (2015) Modeling and optimization of ultrasonic metal welding on dissimilar sheets using fuzzy based genetic algorithm approach. Eng Sci Technol Int J 18(4):634–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Satpathy MP, Sahoo SK (2017) Mechanical performance and metallurgical characterization of ultrasonically welded dissimilar joints. J Manuf Process 25:443–451.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Safavi E, Tarkian M, Gavel H, Ölvander J (2015) Collaborative multidisciplinary design optimization: a framework applied on aircraft conceptual system design. Concurr Eng 23(3):236–249.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X15587020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tiwari A, Hoyos PN, Hutabarat W, Turner C, Ince N, Gan X-P, Prajapat N (2015) Survey on the use of computational optimisation in UK engineering companies. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 9:57–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2015.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Das A, Franciosa P, Pesce A, Gerbino S (2017) Parametric effect analysis of free-form shape error during sheet metal forming. Int J Eng Sci Technol 9(09S):117–124Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Das A, Franciosa P, Gerbino S, Williams D (2016) Prediction of geometric errors of stamped sheet metal parts using deviation field decomposition. In: International conference on competitive manufacturing (COMA), Stellenbosch, South Africa, pp 109–114Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shi X (2011) Design optimization of insulation usage and space conditioning load using energy simulation and genetic algorithm. Energy 36(3):1659–1667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Das A, Franciosa P, Ceglarek D (2015) Fixture design optimisation considering production batch of compliant non-ideal sheet metal parts. Procedia Manuf 1:157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cicconi P, Germani M, Bondi S, Zuliani A, Cagnacci E (2016) A design methodology to support the optimization of steel structures. Procedia CIRP 50:58–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WMGThe University of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations