Selective laser melting of porosity graded lattice structures for bone implants
- 85 Downloads
Porosity-graded lattice structures are used in bone implants to mimic natural bone properties. Rather than having uniform pore size distribution, the size distribution is gradually changed in a certain direction to achieve specific mechanical and biological properties. Selective laser melting (SLM) has been used to print uniform metallic lattice structures with high accuracy. However, the accuracy of SLM in printing lattice structures with a wide range of pore sizes and volume fractions needs to be defined. The effect of SLM process scanning strategies on morphological properties of graded porosity metallic lattice structures is investigated in this study. Three different scanning strategies are proposed, and their effect on volume fraction, strut size, and surface integrity is investigated. Characterization of the printed parts reveals that the effect of different scanning strategies on the morphological quality is highly dependent on the design volume fraction for the chosen unit cell design. It was noted that using hatching strategies results in better dimensional accuracy and surface integrity in high-volume fraction lattice structures. While the use of total fill scanning strategy resulted in significantly distorted geometries in high-volume fractions. However, in lower-volume fractions, the dimensional accuracy as well as the surface integrity are comparable to that of hatching strategies. This work highlights the importance of understanding the limitations and capabilities of the SLM process in this application, and to enhance the printing quality of porosity-graded metallic lattice structures.
KeywordsSelective laser melting Porosity-graded lattice structures Gyroids Dimensional accuracy Surface integrity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; funding reference number 518494).
- 2.Harrysson OLA, Cansizoglu O, Marcellin-Little DJ, Cormier DR, West HA II (2008) Direct metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technology. Mater Sci Eng C 28:366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2007.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B (1992) The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res:124–134. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199201000-00014
- 11.Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, Sasaki K, Otsuki B, Nakamura T, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Matsuda S (2016) Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: an in vivo experiment. Mater Sci Eng C 59:690–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ahmadi SM, Yavari SA, Wauthle R, Pouran B, Schrooten J, Weinans H, Zadpoor A (2015) Additively manufactured open-cell porous biomaterials made from six different space-filling unit cells: the mechanical and morphological properties. Materials (Basel) 8:1871–1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8041871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Onal E, Frith JE, Jurg M, Wu X, Molotnikov A (2018) Mechanical properties and in vitro behavior of additively manufactured and functionally graded Ti6Al4V porous scaffolds. Metals (Basel) 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8040200
- 18.Ahmadi SM, Hedayati R, Ashok Kumar Jain RK, Li Y, Leeflang S, Zadpoor AA (2017) Effects of laser processing parameters on the mechanical properties, topology, and microstructure of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials: a vector-based approach. Mater Des 134:234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Dai D, Gu D, Zhang H, Xiong J, Ma C, Hong C, Poprawe R (2018) Influence of scan strategy and molten pool configuration on microstructures and tensile properties of selective laser melting additive manufactured aluminum based parts. Opt Laser Technol 99:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2017.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kapfer SC, Hyde ST, Mecke K, Arns CH, Schröder-Turk GE (2011) Minimal surface scaffold designs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:6875–6882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Melchels FPW, Bertoldi K, Gabbrielli R, Velders AH, Feijen J, Grijpma DW (2010) Mathematically defined tissue engineering scaffold architectures prepared by stereolithography. Biomaterials 31:6909–6916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Melancon D, Bagheri ZS, Johnston RB, Liu L, Tanzer M, Pasini D (2017) Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants. Acta Biomater 63:350–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Arabnejad S, Burnett Johnston R, Pura JA, Singh B, Tanzer M, Pasini D (2016) High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: a strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomater 30:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bobbert FSL, Lietaert K, Eftekhari AA, Pouran B, Ahmadi SM, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA (2017) Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: a unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomater 53:572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kruth J-P, Deckers J, Yasa E, Wauthlé R Assessing and comparing influencing factors of residual stresses in selective laser melting using a novel analysis method. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405412437085
- 32.Kudzal A, McWilliams B, Hofmeister C, Kellogg F, Yu J, Taggart-Scarff J, Liang J (2017) Effect of scan pattern on the microstructure and mechanical properties of powder bed fusion additive manufactured 17-4 stainless steel. Mater Des 133:205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2017.07.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Schwanekamp T, Bräuer M, Reuber M (2017) Geometrical and topological potentialities and restrictions in selective laser sintering of customized carbide precision tools 49:Google Scholar
- 35.Ho ST, Hutmacher DW (2006) A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 27:1362–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2005.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Mumtaz K, Hopkinson N (2009) Top surface and side roughness of Inconel 625 parts processed using selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 15Google Scholar