Endurance tests of a linear peristaltic actuator

  • João Falcão CarneiroEmail author
  • Fernando Gomes de Almeida
  • João Bravo Pinto


Pneumatic actuators are typically discarded for applications where fine motion control is required, mainly due to the nonlinearities caused by friction effects between piston and rod seals. Conventional control laws are unable to counteract this phenomenon, and thus, conventional actuators find limited applicability in servo control systems. Recently, the use of an alternative solution, a pneumatic linear peristaltic actuator (PLPA), was proposed to overcome this problem. In its present embodiment, a PLPA comprehends two rollers pressing a hose and thereby defining two separate chambers. The use of a PLPA has several potential advantages over conventional or low friction actuators, but its endurance is yet to be known as no studies on this topic can be found in literature. This paper tries to fill this gap by presenting an experimental characterization of some mechanical properties of three different hoses, which are subsequently used in experimental endurance tests. This paper also presents a detailed description of the failure causes found and an analysis on how different parameters may influence its longevity. Finally, possible solutions to increase the life of PLPAs are envisaged.


Servopneumatic systems Pneumatic actuators Motion control Linear peristaltic actuators 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Funding information

This work is financially support by ‘Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia’, through contract LAETA—UID/SEM/50022/2013.


  1. 1.
    Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes de Almeida F (2014) Micro tracking and positioning using off-the-shelf servopneumatics. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30(3):244–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes Almeida F (2016) On the influence of velocity and acceleration estimators on a servopneumatic system behaviour. IEEE Access 4:6541–6553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes de Almeida F (2012) A macro-micro motion servopneumatic device. Proc of the Inst of Mech Eng, Part I, J of Syst and Cont Eng 226(6):775–786Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes de Almeida F (2014) Accurate motion control of a servopneumatic system using integral sliding mode control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(9):1533–1548Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inc., C. Rolling diaphragm cylinders. [cited 20/04/2018]; Available from:
  6. 6.
    Airpot Corporation. Pneumatic actuators. [cited 30/04/2018]; Available from:
  7. 7.
    Yung-Tien L, Tien-Tsai K, Kuo-Ming C, Sheng-Yuan C (2013) Observer-based adaptive sliding mode control for pneumatic servo system. Precis Eng 37(3):522–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taheri B, Case D, and Richer E (2012) Design of robust nonlinear force and stiffness controller for pneumatic actuators. in 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). Maui, Hawaii, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kagawa T, Tokashiki L, Fujita T (2000) Accurate positioning of a pneumatic servosystem with air bearings. in Proc. of the Bath Workshop on Power Transmis. and Motion Control. ,Bath, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li J, Kawashima K, Kagawa T, Fujita T (2011) Trajectory control of pneumatic servo table with air bearing in 2011 International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics. Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carmel M (2013) Soft robotics: a perspective—current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robotics (SoRo) 1(1):5–11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feng N, Shi Q, Wang H, Gong J, Liu C, Lu Z (2018) A soft robotic hand: design, analysis, sEMG control, and experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1–4):319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rehman T, Faudzi A, Dewi D, Ali M (2017) Design, characterization, and manufacturing of circular bellows pneumatic soft actuator. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(9–12):4295–4304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robertson M, Sadeghi H, Florez J, Paik J (2017) Soft pneumatic actuator fascicles for high force and reliability. Soft Robotics (SoRo) 4(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson RM, Kothera CS, Sanner RM, Wereley NM (2016) Nonlinear control of robotic manipulators driven by pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE/ASME Trans on Mechatronics 21(1):55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bone GM, Ning S (2007) Experimental comparison of position tracking control algorithms for pneumatic cylinder actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans on Mechatronics 12(5):557–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jouppila, V., S. Andrew Gadsden, and A. Ellman, Experimental comparisons of sliding mode controlled pneumatic muscle and cylinder actuators. J Dyn Syst Meas Control, 2014. 136(4): p. 044503–044503–10Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krivts I, Krejnin G (2006) Pneumatic actuating systems for automatic equipment: structure and design. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hawkes EW, Christensen DL, Okamura AM (2016) Design and implementation of a 300% strain soft artificial muscle. in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bone G, Xue M, Flett J (2015) Position control of hybrid pneumatic–electric actuators using discrete-valued model-predictive control. Mechatronics 25:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ashby G, Bone G (2016) Improved hybrid pneumatic-electric actuator for robot arms. in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). Banff, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manuello Bertetto A, Mazza L, Orrù PF (2015) Contact pressure distribution in guide bearings for pneumatic actuators. Exp Tech 39(2):46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Belforte G, Ivanov A, Manuello Bertetto A, Mazza L (2013) Experimental method for investigating air leakage in rodless cylinders. Exp Tech, p. 1–10Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes de Almeida F. Experimental characteristics of a linear peristaltic actuator. in IFK 2018, 11th International Fluid Power Conference 2018. AachenGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes Almeida F (2018) Friction characteristics and servo control of a linear peristaltic actuator. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):2117–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    DexyFlex. FIRE TYANA SL. [cited 06/02/2018]; Available from:
  27. 27.
    Fitt. Hiflat LD. [cited 30/04/2018]; Available from:
  28. 28.
    Productos Mesa. FLEXIGOM (R) AIR. [cited 06/02/2018]; Available from:
  29. 29.
    Gent AN (1958) On the relation between indentation hardness and Young’s modulus. Rubber Chem Technol 31(4):896–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Falcão Carneiro J, Gomes Almeida F (2014) LuGre friction model: application to a pneumatic actuated system. in Controlo 2014, 11th Conference on Automatic Control. Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    SMC Corporation. Pneumatic actuators. [cited 30/04/2018]; Available from:
  32. 32.
    Festo. Standard drives. [cited 06/02/2018]; 3]. Available from:

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Falcão Carneiro
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Fernando Gomes de Almeida
    • 1
    • 2
  • João Bravo Pinto
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.INEGIUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations