Advertisement

Experimental and numerical analysis of grain refinement effect on hot tearing susceptibility for Al–Mg alloys

  • R. TakaiEmail author
  • N. Endo
  • R. Hirohara
  • T. Tsunoda
  • M. Yoshida
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Results of finite element method (FEM) thermal stress analyses during solidification of an Al–Mg alloy with different grain sizes revealed the contribution of the macroscopic strain to the reduction of hot tearing susceptibility by the grain refinement. This study used an elasto-creep model to describe the mechanical behavior of the alloy in the semi-solid state. The grain size–dependence was described using the experimentally determined two parameters of n (=dlog\( {\dot{\upvarepsilon}}^{\mathrm{c}} \)/dlogσ) and A in the power-law creep model in earlier work. Results showed that grain refinement makes the creep strain distribution more uniform and suppresses the maximum strain value during solidification, which in turn should contribute to reducing the hot tearing susceptibility. This result demonstrates that the grain size–dependence of the two creep parameters during the solidification is a key factor for the quantitative prediction of hot tearing tendency with the consideration of grain size.

Keywords

Hot tearing Grain refinement Al–Mg alloy Thermal stress analysis The strain rate sensitivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lees DCG (1946) The hot-tearing tendencies of aluminum casting alloys. J Inst Met 72:343–364Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin S, Aliravci C, Pekguleryuz MO (2007) Hot-tear susceptibility of aluminum wrought alloys and the effect of grain refining. Metall Mater Trans A 38:1056–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kimura R, Hatayama H, Shinozaki K, Murashima I, Asada J, Yoshida M (2009) Effect of grain refiner and grain size on the susceptibility of Al–Mg die casting alloy to cracking during solidification. J Mater Process Technol 209:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grandfield JF, Eskin DG, Bainbridge IF (2013) Direct-chill casting of light alloys. Wiley-TMS, pp:103–143Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pellini W (1952) Strain theory of hot tearing. Foundry 80:125–137Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bishop HF, Ackerlind CG, Pellini WS (1957) Investigation of metallurgical and mechanical effects in the development of hot tearing. Trans Am Foundry Soc 65:247–258Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell J (1992) Castings second edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 242–258Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eskin DG, Suyitno, Katgerman K (2004) Mechanical properties in the semi-solid state and hot tearing of aluminium alloys. Prog Mater Sci 49:629–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magnin B, Maenner L, Katgerman L, Engler S (1996) Ductility and rheology of an Al–4.5%Cu alloy from room temperature to coherency temperature. Mater Sci Forum 222:1209–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagaumi H, Umeda T (2002) Prediction of internal cracking in a direct-chill cast, high strength, Al–Mg–Si alloy. J Light Met 2:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M'Hamdi M, Benum S, Mortensen D, Fjær HG, Drezet J-M (2003) The importance of viscoplastic strain rate in the formation of center cracks during the start-up phase of direct-chill cast aluminum extrusion ingots. Metall Mater Trans A 34:1941–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suyitno KWH, Katgerman L (2004) Finite element method simulation of mushy zone behavior during direct-chill casting of an Al–4.5 pct Cu alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 35:2918–2926Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pokorny M, Monroe C, Beckermann C, Bichler L, Ravindran C (2008) Prediction of hot tear formation in a magnesium alloy permanent mold casting. Int J Met 2:41–53Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi Z, Dong J, Zhang M, Zheng L (2014) Hot tearing susceptibility analysis and prediction of K418 superalloy for auto turbocharger turbine wheel. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 24:2737–2751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prokhorov NN (1962) Resistance to hot tearing of cast metals during solidification Russian Casting Production 2:172–175Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillion AB, Cockcroft SL, Lee PD (2009) Predicting the constitutive behavior of semi-solids via a direct finite element simulation: application to AA5182. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:055011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jamaly N, Phillion AB, Drezet J-M (2013) Stress–strain predictions of semisolid Al–Mg–Mn alloys during direct chill casting: effects of microstructure and process variables. Metall Mater Trans B Process Metall Mater Process Sci 44:1287–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Phillion AB, Cockcroft SL, Lee PD (2008) A three-phase simulation of the effect of microstructural features on semi-solid tensile deformation. Acta Mater 56:4328–4338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takai R, Matsushita A, Yanagida S, Nakamura K, Yoshida M (2015) Development of an elasto-viscoplastic constitutive equation for an Al–Mg alloy undergoing a tensile test during partial solidification. Mater Trans 56:1233–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takai R, Kimura S, Kashiuchi R, Kotaki H, Yoshida M (2016) Grain refinement effects on the strain rate sensitivity and grain boundary sliding in partially solidified Al–5 wt.%Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 667:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takai R, Tsunoda T, Kawada Y, Hirohara R, Okane T, Yoshida M (2018) Effect of temperature field and mechanical properties of casting on prediction of hot tearing tendency using FEM thermal stress analysis. Mater Trans 59:1333–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stangeland A, Mo A, M'Hamdi M, Viano D, Davidson C (2006) Thermal strain in the mushy zone related to hot tearing. Metall Mater Trans A 37:705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pokorny MG, Monroe CA, Beckermann C, Zhen Z, Hort N (2010) Simulation of stresses during casting of binary Mg-Al alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 41:3196–3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giraud E, Suery M, Coret M (2010) Mechanical behavior of AA6061 aluminum in the semisolid state obtained by partial melting and partial solidification. Metall Mater Trans A 41:2257–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirohara R, Kawada K, Takai R, Otaki M, Okane T, Yoshida M (2017) Prediction and experimental validation of cooling rate dependence of viscoplastic properties in a partially solidified state of Al–5mass%Mg alloy. Mater Trans 58:1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singer ARE, Cottrell SA (1947) Properties of the aluminum–silicon alloys at temperatures in the region of the solidus. J Inst Met 73:33–54Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dahle AK, Arnberg L (1997) Development of strength in solidifying aluminium alloys. Acta Mater 45:547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Metz SA, Flemings MC (1970) A fundamental study of hot tearing. AFS Trans 78:453–460Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kubota M, Kitaoka S (1973) Solidification behavior and hot tearing tendency of aluminum casting alloys. AFS Trans 81:424–427Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alankar A, Wells MA (2010) Constitutive behavior of as-cast aluminum alloys AA3104, AA5182 and AA6111 at below solidus temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 527:7812–7820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Odqvist FKG (1974) Mathematical theory of creep and creep rupture second edition. Clarendon Press, pp. 22Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Norton FH (1929) The creep of steel at high temperatures. McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 67Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bailey RW (1935) The utilization of creep test data in engineering design. Proc Inst Mech eng 131:131–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eskin DG, Suyitno MJF, Katgerman L (2004) Contraction of aluminum alloys during and after solidification. Metall Mater Trans A 35:1325–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stangeland A, Mo A, Nielsen Ø, Eskin D, M'Hamdi M (2004) Development of thermal strain in the coherent mushy zone during solidification of aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 35:2903–2915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Drezet J-M, Eggeler G (1994) High apparent creep activation energies in mushy zone microstructures. Scripta Metall Mater 31:757–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hao H, Maijer DM, Wells MA, Phillion A, Cockcroft SL (2010) Modeling the stress-strain behavior and hot tearing during direct chill casting of an AZ31 magnesium billet. Metall Mater Trans A 41:2067–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    D'Elia F, Ravindran C, Sediako D (2015) Interplay among solidification, microstructure, residual strain and hot tearing in B206 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 624:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Prasad YVRK, Seshacharyulu T (1998) Modelling of hot deformation for microstructural control. Inter Mater Rev 43:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Narayana Murty SVS, Nageswara Rao B, Kashyap BP (2000) Instability criteria for hot deformation of materials. Inter Mater Rev 45:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sheikh Ansari MH, Aghaie-Khafri M (2018) Predicting flow localization in semi-solid deformation. Inter J Mater Form 11:165–173CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Takai
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • N. Endo
    • 1
  • R. Hirohara
    • 1
    • 3
  • T. Tsunoda
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. Yoshida
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Modern Mechanical EngineeringGraduate School of Waseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.IHI CorporationTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Honda Motor Co., Ltd.TokyoJapan
  4. 4.Kagami Memorial Research Institute for Materials Science and TechnologyWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations