Advertisement

Springback behavior of fiber metal laminates in hat-shaped draw bending process: experimental and numerical evaluation

  • Soheil Keipour
  • Mahdi Gerdooei
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Fiber metal laminates (FMLs) are one of the most applicable composite sheets that consist of metal layers and fiber-reinforced polymers. These layers are jointed to each other with epoxy or polyurethane resins. In the present study, the experimental and numerical investigations of springback in hat-shaped channel bending have been performed. At first, FMLs were produced with aluminum 2024-T3 sheets, unidirectional E-glass fibers and polyurethane resin by using a hot press with the capability of adjusting both the squeezing pressure and temperature. The specimens were produced according to the lay-up in 0° and 90° directions of metal sheets and fiber-reinforced core, then the hat-shaped channel bending was performed. Furthermore, the effect of parameters such as FML lay-up, channel depth, and core thickness on the springback angle in the flange and wall zones was studied. In the numerical section, the parameters such as plastic equivalent strain in metallic layers as well as the springback of FML with different lay-ups were investigated. The results showed that in asymmetric lay-ups where the fiber was in the longitudinal direction, the replacement of lower and upper sheets affected the springback significantly; however, where the fiber is in the transverse direction, the springback was unaffected by the same replacement. Also, due to the low elastic modulus of composite core versus metal skin, the core thickness had little effect on springback. The comparison between numerical and experimental observations showed a desirable agreement of FML geometry after unloading.

Keywords

Fiber metal laminate Springback Hat-shaped channel Draw bending 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Botelho EC, Silva RA, Pardini LC, Rezende MC (2006) A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures. Mater Res 9(3):247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alderliesten R, Benedictus R (2008) Fiber/metal composite technology for future primary aircraft structures. J Aircr 45(4):1182–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang P-Y, Yeh P-C, Yang J-M (2008) Fatigue crack initiation in hybrid boron/glass/aluminum fiber metal laminates. Mater Sci Eng A 496(1–2):273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu H, Wu L (1996) A study of tension test specimens of laminated hybrid composites. 1: methods of approach. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 27(8):647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moussavi-Torshizi SE, Dariushi S, Sadighi M, Safarpour P (2010) A study on tensile properties of a novel fiber/metal laminates. Mater Sci Eng A 527(18–19):4920–4925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abdullah M, Cantwell W (2006) The impact resistance of polypropylene-based fibre–metal laminates. Compos Sci Technol 66(11–12):1682–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sinmazçelik T, Avcu E, Bora MÖ, Çoban O (2011) A review: fibre metal laminates, background, bonding types and applied test methods. Mater Des 32(7):3671–3685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pora J (2001) Composite materials in the airbus A380–from history to future. Proceedings of ICCM13, Plenary lecture, CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruokolainen RB, Sigler DR (2008) The effect of adhesion and tensile properties on the formability of laminated steels. J Mater Eng Perform 17(3):330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Najafi M, Ansari R, Darvizeh A (2017) Environmental effects on mechanical properties of glass/epoxy and Fiber metal laminates, part I: Hygrothermal aging. Mech Adv Compos Struct 4(3):187–196Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen Z, Gandhi U, Lee J, Wagoner R (2016) Variation and consistency of Young’s modulus in steel. J Mater Process Technol 227:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang X, Choi C, Sever NK, Altan T (2016) Prediction of springback in air-bending of advanced high strength steel (DP780) considering young’s modulus variation and with a piecewise hardening function. Int J Mech Sci 105:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang J, Wagoner R, Matlock D, Barlat F (2005) Anticlastic curvature in draw-bend springback. Int J Solids Struct 42(5–6):1287–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagoner RH, Lim H, Lee M-G (2013) Advanced issues in springback. Int J Plast 45:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li G, Kang Y (2003) FEM simulation of bending formability for laminate steel/resin/steel lightweight composite sheet. Cailiao Kexue Yu Jishu J Mater Sci Technol (China) 19:324–326Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li H, Chen J, Yang J (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of laminated steel sheet in V-bending process considering nonlinear visco-elasticity of polymer layer. J Mater Process Technol 212(1):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parsa M, Ettehad M (2010) Experimental and finite element study on the spring back of double curved aluminum/polypropylene/aluminum sandwich sheet. Mater Des 31(9):4174–4183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim SY, Choi WJ, Park SY (2007) Spring-back characteristics of fiber metal laminate (GLARE) in brake forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(5–6):445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nikhare CP. Springback analysis in bilayer material bending. In: ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2017. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V002T002A062-V002T002A062Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu J, Xue W (2017) Unconstrained bending and springback behaviors of aluminum-polymer sandwich sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5–8):1517–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simulia DS (2010) Abaqus analysis user’s manual. Dassault Systemes, PawtucketGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parsa M, Mohammadi S, Aghchai AJ (2014) Al3105/polypropylene/Al3105 laminates springback in V-die bending. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5–8):849–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aghchai AJ, Khatami S (2018) Experimental and numerical formability investigation of FML sheets with glass fiber reinforced core. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–11Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rajabi A, Kadkhodayan M, Manoochehri M, Farjadfar R (2015) Deep-drawing of thermoplastic metal-composite structures: experimental investigations, statistical analyses and finite element modeling. J Mater Process Technol 215:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu S, Chai GB (2012) Low-velocity impact response of fibre–metal laminates–experimental and finite element analysis. Compos Sci Technol 72(15):1793–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hu J, Marciniak Z, Duncan J (2002) Mechanics of sheet metal forming. ElsevierGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical and Mechatronics EngineeringShahrood University of TechnologyShahroodIran

Personalised recommendations