Advertisement

Value chain and production cost optimization by integrating additive manufacturing in injection molding process chain

  • Guido ToselloEmail author
  • Alessandro Charalambis
  • Laoucine Kerbache
  • Michael Mischkot
  • David Bue Pedersen
  • Matteo Calaon
  • Hans Nørgaard Hansen
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) can create considerable value when integrated into conventional manufacturing process chains. Tooling for new molded product development as pilot case of integration of AM in the injection molding process chain is investigated. The study shows that injection molding based on AM for fabrication of polymer tool inserts is economically advantageous allowing 80–90% production costs reduction as compared with a conventional tooling process chain based on machining. Fabrication of soft tools with AM results in a production lead time reduction in the range of 60–70% compared to the time required to machine mold inserts in brass or aluminum.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Injection molding Tooling Production cost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

The Manufacturing Academy of Denmark (MADE) project (http://en.made.dk/), WorkPackage 3 “Additive Manufacturing and Advanced Manufacturing Technologies,” funded by Innovation Fund Denmark (https://innovationsfonden.dk/en), and the Marie og M. B. Richter’s Fond (Denmark) are acknowledged for supporting the present research. The authors thank the HEC Paris Business School (France) for the partial financial support to conduct this research.

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM International (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies – general principles – terminology. ISO/ASTM 52900, vol i, pp. 1–9Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wohlers Associates (2017) Wohlers Report 2017 – 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the IndustryGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Osswald TA, Baur E, Brinkmann S, Oberbach K, Schmachtenberg E (2006) International plastics handbook – the resource for plastics engineers. Publisher: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, ISBN: 978-3-446-22905-1. doi  https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446407923
  4. 4.
    Zhang Y, Pedersen DB, Segebrecht AG, Mischkot M, Tosello G (2017) A Soft Tooling process chain employing Additive Manufacturing for injection molding of a 3D component with micro pillars. J Manuf Process 27:138–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mischkot M, Tosello G, Nielsen DKY, Pedersen DB, Zhang Y, Hofstätter T, Herbin L, Hansen HN (2017) Injection moulding pilot production: performance assessment of tooling process chains based on tool inserts made from brass and a 3D printed photopolymer, in annual technical conference (ANTEC2017) of the Society of Plastic Engineers, Anaheim, CA (USA), 2017, 5 pagesGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hofstätter T, Bey N, Mischkot M, Stotz PM, Pedersen DB, Tosello G, Hansen HN (2017) Integration of fiber-reinforced polymers in a life cycle assessment of injection molding process chains with additive manufacturing. In: Meboldt M, Klahn C (eds) Industrializing additive manufacturing – AM in products and applications – AMPA2017. vol i–xii, pp 1-363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66866-627
  7. 7.
    Thompson MK, Stolfi A, Mischkot M (2016) Process chain modeling and selection in an additive manufacturing context. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 12:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Franchetti M, Kress C (2016) An economic analysis comparing the cost feasibility of replacing injection molding processes with emerging additive manufacturing techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:2573–2579Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopkinson N, Dicknes P (2003) Analysis of rapid manufacturing using layer manufacturing processes for production. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 217(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruffo, M., Tuck, C., Hague, R., 2006, Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing-laser sintering production for low to medium volumes, 220/9:1417–1427Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Atzeni E, Iuliano L, Minetola P, Salmi A (2010) Redesign and cost estimation of rapid manufactured plastic parts. Rapid Prototyp J 16(5):308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schniederjans DG (2017) Adoption of 3D-printing technologies in manufacturing: a survey analysis. Int J Prod Econ 183:287–298, 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wohlers TT, Caffrey T, Campbell RI (2016) Wohlers Report 2016: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry: Annual Worldwide Progress Report. Wohlers Associates, pp 1–344Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2014) Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. vol i–xxi. Springer, pp 1–498.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3
  15. 15.
    Thompson MK, Moroni G, Vaneker T, Fadel G, Campbell RI, Gibson I, Bernard A, Schulz J, Graf P, Ahuja B, Martina F (2016) Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65(2):737–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gebhardt A, Hötter J-S (2016) Additive manufacturing – 3D printing for prototyping and manufacturing. vol i–xx. Publisher: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, pp 1–591.  https://doi.org/10.3139/9781569905838

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Tosello
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alessandro Charalambis
    • 1
  • Laoucine Kerbache
    • 2
  • Michael Mischkot
    • 1
  • David Bue Pedersen
    • 1
  • Matteo Calaon
    • 1
  • Hans Nørgaard Hansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University of Denmark (DTU)Kgs. LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Information’s Systems and Operations ManagementHEC ParisJouy-en-JosasFrance

Personalised recommendations