Advertisement

Cross-sectional deformation of thin-walled rectangular tube in small-radius rotary draw bending under different die sets

  • Mengmeng Liu
  • Yuli LiuEmail author
  • Hong Zhan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

To understand the effect of dies on the cross-sectional deformation of thin-walled rectangular H96 brass tube during the small-radius rotary draw bending (RDB) process, the reliable 3D FE models with eight different die sets were established based on ABAQUS platform, and the cross-sectional deformation of thin-walled rectangular tube with different die sets was investigated. The results show that the mandrel can obviously suppress the cross-sectional deformation of thin-walled rectangular tube. The wiper die can improve the cross-sectional deformation under the die set of base die set+mandrel+booster die, but it will increase the deformation when other die sets are used. Adding a booster die can improve the cross-sectional deformation, but when the die set is different, the degree of improvement is also different. The effect of each die on cross-sectional deformation of rectangular tube during small-radius bending is clarified, and optimal die set can be reasonably selected according to the requirement of cross-sectional deformation in engineering applications.

Keywords

Thin-walled rectangular tube Small-radius rotary draw bending Cross-sectional deformation Numerical simulation Die set 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This study received financial support from the Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen of China (No. JCYJ20170306160003433) and 111 Project (No. B08040).

References

  1. 1.
    Jiang JY (2005) Facility development and process research for waveguide tube bending. Dissertation, University of Science and Technology Beijing [In Chinese]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu HY, Ai CC, Sun Z (2012) Influences of tools gap on formability and springback of thin-walled tube during rotary bending. Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering 2:15–18 [In Chinese]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xue SD (2009) Technology design of thin-wall rectangle pipes for small R bending. Bus Technology and Research 3:39–40.  https://doi.org/10.15917/j.cnki.1006-3331.2009.03.001 [In Chinese]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li H, Yang H, Zhan M, Sun ZC, Gu RJ (2007) Role of mandrel in NC precision bending process of thin-walled tube. Int J Mach Tool Manu 47(7–8):1164–1175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.09.001 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhan M, Jiang ZQ, Yang H, Xu XD, Li GJ (2011) Numerically controlled bending performance of medium strength TA18 titanium alloy tubes under different die sets. SCIENCE CHINA Technol Sci 54(4):841–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4241-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu SQ, Fang J, Tang JX, Wang KL (2016) Effects of different die sets on forming quality of 0Cr21Ni6Mn9N stainless steel tube during NC bending. China Mechanical Engineering 27(12):1673–1678.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2016.12.020 [In Chinese]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang JJ, Yang H, Zhan M, Shen SJ (2008) Effects of pressing die’s boosting function on wall thinning and springback in NC bending process of thin-walled tube with large diameter. Journal of Plasticity Engineering 15(1):60–65 [In Chinese]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bardelcik A, Worswick MJ (2005) The effect of element formulation on the prediction of boost effects in numerical tube bending. Amer Inst Phys 774–780Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang D, Li D, Yin Z, Peng YH (2009) Roles of surface booster system on bending of thin-walled copper tube. J Mater Eng Perform 18(4):369–377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-008-9300-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masoumi H, Mirbagheri Y, Jafari NR, Salem M, Kalantari M (2012) Effect of mandrel, its clearance and pressure die on tube bending process via rotary draw bending method. Int J Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology 5(21):47–52Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sukimoto M, Taguchi Y, Sakaguchi M, Akiyoshi H, Endou J (1994) Deformation of a cross section of 6063 alloy circular tube by rotary draw bending. J Japan Inst of Light Metals 44(9):475–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu KX, Liu YL, Yang H (2013) Experimental study on the effect of dies on wall thickness distribution in NC bending of thin-walled rectangular 3A21 aluminum alloy tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(5–8):1867–1874.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4983-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okude Y, Sakaki S, Yoshihara S, Macdonald BJ (2012) Increasing the working limit of extruded aluminum tubes during draw bending by introducing a wiper die. Mater Trans 53(53):857–878Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu YX, Liu YL, Yang H (2015) Effect of mandrel-cores on springback and sectional deformation of rectangular H96 tube NC bending. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:351–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6657-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ancellotti S, Benedetti M, Fontanari V, Slaghenaufi S, Tassan M (2016) Rotary draw bending of rectangular tubes using a novel parallelepiped elastic mandrel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5–8):1089–1103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8000-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhan H, Liu YL, Zhang HL (2017) Study on cross-sectional deformation of rectangular waveguide tube with different materials in rotary draw bending. J Mater Res 32(20):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in ShenzhenShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, School of Materials Science and EngineeringNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Southwest Technology and Engineering Research InstituteChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations