Advertisement

Optimization of STL model and layer shape for laser cladding forming

  • Huadong Zheng
  • Ming CongEmail author
  • Dong Liu
  • Hang Dong
  • Yi Liu
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Laser cladding forming (LCF) is a type of additive manufacturing technologies, which is promising in many fields such as individuation manufacturing, parts repair, green remanufacturing, and so on. However, uneven mesh model distribution and mutation points of layer shape are bad for LCF process. Aiming at these problems, the optimization methods of STL model and layer shape are proposed. To improve the smoothness of stereo lithography (STL) model, the STL model is optimized by the discrete Laplace mesh deformation method. Then, the smoothness of STL model and the uniformity of the triangular face in the model are both improved. The regularity calculation model is established to quantify the optimization results by radius ratio method. Regarding the turbine blade as a research object, the optimization of STL model for turbine blade is conducted, and the optimizing results of turbine blade STL model are quantified. To solve the problem of path point mutation of the cladding path for the robot, an optimization method based on the path interpolation of layer shape is proposed, which is verified by simulation and experiment.

Keywords

Laser cladding forming Laplace mesh deformation method Layer shape STL 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editors and the referees.

Funding information

The work of this article has been partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51575078).

References

  1. 1.
    Gardan J (2016) Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. Int J Production Res 54:3118–3132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cerit E, Lazoglu I (2011) A CAM-based path generation method for rapid prototyping applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas D (2015) Costs, benefits, and adoption of additive manufacturing: a supply chain perspective. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:1857–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2012) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo N, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8:215–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salonitis K, D’Alvise L, Schoinochoritis B, Chantzis D (2016) Additive manufacturing and post-processing simulation: laser cladding followed by high speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:2401–2411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gohari H, Barari A, Kishawy H (2018) An efficient methodology for slicing NURBS surfaces using multi-step methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95:3111–3125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siraskar N, Paul R, Anand S (2015) Adaptive slicing in additive manufacturing process using a modified boundary octree data structure. J Manufacturing Sci 137(1):011007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou C (2014) A direct tool path planning algorithm for line scanning based stereolithography. J Manuf Sci 136(6):061023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Calignano F, Lorusso M, Pakkanen J, Trevisan F, Ambrosio EP, Manfredi D, Fino P (2016) Investigation of accuracy and dimensional limits of part produced in aluminum alloy by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(1–4):1–8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonada J, Muguruza A, Fernández-Francos X, Ramis X (2018) Optimisation procedure for additive manufacturing processes based on mask image projection to improve Z accuracy and resolution. J Manuf Process 31:689–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dong HW (2011) Survey of mesh deformation. J Image Graphics 16(12):2095–2104Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu F, Zhou H, Li D (2008) Repair of STL errors. Int J Prod Res 47(1):105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang CS, Chang TR, Hu YN, Hsiao CY, Teng CK (2005) STL mesh re-triangulation in rapid prototyping manufacturing. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics. ICM '05, Taipei, pp 492–497Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Terzopoulos D., Platt J., Barr A., Fleischer K (1987) Elastically deformable models. 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Anaheim, United States, p 205–214Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Putranto EHE, Suzuki T, Usuki S, Miura KT (2017) Forming intermediate spatial resolution of microscopy images for continuous zooming on multi-resolution processing system. Applications of Digital Image Processing XL, San Diego, p 1039615Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang BQ, Xing Y, Ruan XY (2004) Mesh simplification based on features preserving and triangles optimization. J Shanghai Jiaotong 38(8):1373–1377Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guéziec A (1996) Surface simplification inside a tolerance volume. Computer Sci Math, p 1–58Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hamann B (1994) A data reduction scheme for triangulated surfaces. Comput Aided Geom Des 11(2):197–214MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zheng HD, Cong M, Liu D, Liu Y, Du Y (2016) Automatic path and trajectory planning for laser cladding robot based on CAD. International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, pp 1338–1343Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zheng HD, Cong M, Dong H, Liu Y, Liu D (2017) CAD-based automatic path generation and optimization for laser cladding robot in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(9–12):1–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huadong Zheng
    • 1
  • Ming Cong
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dong Liu
    • 1
  • Hang Dong
    • 1
  • Yi Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations