Advertisement

Comparison of mandrel and counter-roller spinning methods for manufacturing large sheaves

  • Chengcheng ZhuEmail author
  • Shengdun Zhao
  • Shuaipeng Li
  • Shuqin Fan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

A number of spinning methods can be utilized to produce large sheaves such as crosshead sheaves. However, few studies have investigated the relationship and differences between these methods. Therefore, an exploration of spinning features is necessary. In this study, four typical spinning methods, including a novel counter-roller spinning method, were selected to study the forming process. Numerical simulation and experiment study were performed. A theoretical model was then proposed to determine the differences between each spinning method. Stress and strain distribution, thickness reduction, and spinning forces during the forming process were obtained, and results of the simulations and experiments matched well. Variations in the sheave thickness, stress value, and spinning force were observed with different spinning methods. Although all spinning methods investigated in this study could form sheaves, counter-roller spinning with a simple roller method demonstrated the smallest thickness reduction, spinning force, and forming stress. Therefore, the counter-roller spinning should be the first option for spinning large sheaves.

Keywords

Mandrel spinning Counter-roller spinning Spinning theory Finite element method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Coordination Innovation Project of Shaanxi Province [grant number 2011KTCQ01-04] and the State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials [grant number 1991DA105206].

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang Q, Zhao SD, Fan SQ, Qian DQ (2010) Sheet metal forming process of new crosshead sheave for elevator and its numerical simulation. Cailiao Kexue Yu Gongyi/material Science & Technology 18:176–181Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Janovskỳ L (1999) Elevator mechanical design. Elevator World IncGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang Q, Zhang C, Zhang MJ, Zhu CC, Fan SQ, Zhao SD (2015) Research of net-shape power spinning technology for poly-v grooved aluminum pulley. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(9):1601–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang L, Yang H, Zhan M (2008) 3d-fe modeling method of splitting spinning. Comput Mater Sci 42(4):643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Radtke W (2006) Novel manufacturing methods for titanium tanks and liners. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, p 5269Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu C, Meng D, Zhao S, Li S (2018) Investigation of groove shape variation during steel sheave spinning. Materials 11(6):960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Molladavoudi HR, Djavanroodi F (2011) Experimental study of thickness reduction effects on mechanical properties and spinning accuracy of aluminum 7075-o, during flow forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(9-12):949–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chunjiang Z, Guanghui L, Jie X, Zhengyi J, Qingxue H, Jianmei W, Hailong C (2018) A quasi-dynamic model for high-speed ball spinning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(5-8):2447–2460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hazawi ARK, Abdel-Magied RK, Elsheikh MN (2017) An experimental analysis of a flaring process for tube ends using a novel spinning tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1-4):157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jia Z, Han Z, Xu Q, Peng W (2014) Numerical simulation and experiment study on hollow spinning process for square cross-section cone. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(9-12):1605–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abdel-Magied RK (2015) A novel technique with compound tool for multi-stage metal spinning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(1-4):57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li Y, Wang J, Gd Lu, Gj P (2014) A numerical study of the effects of roller paths on dimensional precision in die-less spinning of sheet metal. J Zhejiang University Sci A 15(6):432–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmed KI, Gadala MS, El-Sebaie MG (2015) Deep spinning of sheet metals. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 97:72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lossen B, Homberg W (2014) Friction-spinning–interesting approach to manufacture of complex sheet metal parts and tubes. Procedia Eng 81:2379–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu W, Zhao X, Ma H, Shan D, Lin H (2016) Influence of roller distribution modes on spinning force during tube spinning. Int J Mech Sci 113:10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hua F, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Guo M, Guo D, Tong W, Hu Z (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of tube spinning. J Mater Process Technol 168(1):68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zoghi H, Arezoodar AF, Sayeaftabi M (2013) Enhanced finite element analysis of material deformation and strain distribution in spinning of 42crmo steel tubes at elevated temperature. Mater Des 47:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roy M, Klassen R, Wood J (2009) Evolution of plastic strain during a flow forming process. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):1018–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang L, Long H (2011) A study of effects of roller path profiles on tool forces and part wall thickness variation in conventional metal spinning. J Mater Process Technol 211(12):2140– 2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jia Z, Han Z, Liu B, Fan Z (2017) Numerical simulation and experimental study on the non-axisymmetric die-less shear spinning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(1-4):497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang L, Yang H, Zhan M, Hu L (2009) Forming characteristics of splitting spinning based on the behaviors of roller. Comput Mater Sci 45(2):449–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohebbi M, Akbarzadeh A (2010) Experimental study and fem analysis of redundant strains in flow forming of tubes. J Mater Process Technol 210(2):389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao X, Xu W, Chen Y, Ma H, Shan D, Lin H (2017) Fabrication of curved generatrix workpiece of ta15 titanium alloy by variable thickness tube spinning and flaring process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5-8):1983–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hosford WF, Caddell RM (2011) Metal forming: mechanics and metallurgy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yan Y, Wang H, Li Q, Qian B, Mpofu K (2014) Simulation and experimental verification of flexible roll forming of steel sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(1-4):209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ABAQUS (2010) Abaqus Reference Manual (6.10). ABAQUS IncGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kong Q, Yu Z, Zhao Y, Wang H, Lin Z (2017) A study of severe flange wrinkling in first-pass conventional spinning of hemispherical part. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(9-12):3583– 3598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    ReinerKopp, HerbertWiegels (2010) Introduction to metal plastic forming. China Higher Education Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhu C, Zhao S, Zhang Q, Zhang C, Fan S (2015) An algorithm of counter-roller flow-forming force. In: The 7th international conference on tube hydroformingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations