Significance of tool offset and copper interlayer during friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium
- 55 Downloads
This investigation highlights the influence of tool offset on the microstructural evolution, phase formation, and hardness distribution during friction stir welding (FSW) of commercially pure aluminum (Al) to commercially pure titanium (Ti) with a copper (Cu) interlayer (200-μm thick). It was observed that tool offset position controls the mechanical mixing of materials in the weld nugget. The mechanical mixing also depends on the deformation, fragmentation, and distribution of each material in the weld nugget. The fragmentation of materials leads to the development of comparatively fine particles with variation in size and morphology. Insufficient mixing at higher tool offsets promotes the formation of root defects and produces inferior welds. On the other hand, when the tool offset is less than the optimum value, severe deformation and mechanical mixing lead to the formation of wormhole defects and evolution of intermetallic compounds in the weld. The spatial distribution of particles and intermetallics in the weld nugget leads to a large scatter in hardness values. Since mechanical mixing affects the morphology, phase evolution, and mechanical properties of the weld, tool offset is considered to be a very important parameter to be optimized for monitoring mechanical mixing and further development of the dissimilar weld with interlayer material.
KeywordsTool offset position Copper interlayer Mechanical mixing Defect formation Intermetallic compound Hardness distribution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We would like to thank the Institute X-ray facility and Advanced Facility for Microscopy and Microanalysis (AFMM) at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, for providing the facilities.
The authors would like to thank the Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Department of Science and Technology (DST), and Ministry of Human Resources Development (MHRD), India, for the support and research funding.
- 13.Wilden J, Bergmann JP (2004) Manufacturing of titanium/aluminium and titanium/steel joints by means of diffusion welding. Weld Cut 56(5):285–290Google Scholar
- 16.Kar A, Devinder Y, Suwas S, Kailas SV (2016) A study of deformation and microstructural evolution in friction stir welding of aluminum and titanium. Trends Weld Res S39-1:728–731Google Scholar
- 30.Günen A, Kanca E, Demir M, Çavdar F, Mistikoğlu S, Çam G (2018) Microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welded pure lead. Indian J Eng Mat Sci 25(1):26–32Google Scholar
- 39.Kar A, Suwas S, Kailas SV (2017) An investigation on friction stir welding of aluminum to titanium using a nickel interlayer. Conference proceedings: Indian Institute of Welding-International Congress C051: 261–266Google Scholar
- 41.Barekatain H, Kazeminezhad M, Kokabi AH (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties in dissimilar butt friction stir welding of severely plastic deformed aluminum AA 1050 and commercially pure copper sheets. J Mat Sci Technol 30(8):826–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2013.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Song Z, Nakata K, Wu A, Liao J, Zhou L (2014) Influence of probe offset distance on interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir butt welded joint of Ti6Al4V and A6061 dissimilar alloys. Mater Des 57:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar