Advertisement

A resource sharing solution optimized by simulation-based heuristic for garment manufacturing

  • Ke Ma
  • Sébastien Thomassey
  • Xianyi Zeng
  • Lichuan Wang
  • Yan Chen
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Although an increasing number of researches regarding inter-organizational supply chain collaboration (SCC) were conducted, the resource sharing (RS) in SCC is still an under-explored subject. Many RS models are successfully applied in various industries for improving the efficiency of manufacturing. Meanwhile, due to the demand of higher flexibility in the garment production recently, RS has become a novel method in order to optimize the industrial organization. This study explored the feasibility of applying RS in the manufacturing stage of garment supply chain. A KPI based on extended ANP approach was designed to evaluate overall performance of different RS scenarios. Furthermore, a simulation-based heuristic was developed to generate and optimize RS scenario. Finally, experiments based on a discrete-event simulation model of garment production were conducted to examine the performance of all RS scenarios. By comparing the outputs of RS scenario and traditional scenario, the simulation shows that garment manufacturers could get great benefits by applying RS. We also found that the opener garment manufacturers towards RS, the more benefits they can obtain.

Keywords

Garment manufacturing Supply chain collaboration Resource sharing Discrete-event simulation Optimization heuristics Analytical network process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan FTS, Prakash A (2012) Inventory management in a lateral collaborative manufacturing supply chain: a simulation study. Int J Prod Res 50(16):4670–4685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luo J, Chen X (2016) Coordination of random yield supply chains with improved revenue sharing contracts. Eur J Ind Eng 10(1):81.  https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2016.075105 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jaber MY, Osman IH (2006) Coordinating a two-level supply chain with delay in payments and profit sharing. Comput Ind Eng 50(4):385–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2005.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hsiao JM, Shieh CJ (2006) Evaluating the value of information sharing in a supply chain using an ARIMA model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27(5–6):604–609.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2214-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall DC, Saygin C (2012) Impact of information sharing on supply chain performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(1–4):397–409.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3389-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buijs P, Wortmann JC (2014) Joint operational decision-making in collaborative transportation networks: the role of IT. Supply Chain Manag Int J 19(2):200–210.  https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-08-2013-0298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang GM, Liu L (2006) Supply chain decision-making and coordination under price-dependent demand. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 15(3):330–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-5022-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cao M, Vonderembse MA, Zhang QY, Ragu-Nathan TS (2010) Supply chain collaboration: conceptualisation and instrument development. Int J Prod Res 48(22):6613–6635.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903349039 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muffatto M (1999) Introducing a platform strategy in product development. Int J Prod Econ 60:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samaddar S, Rabinowitz G, Mehrez A (1999) Resource sharing and scheduling for cyclic production in a computer-integrated manufacturing cell. Comput Ind Eng 36(3):525–547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00147-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Argoneto P, Renna P (2013) Capacity sharing in a network of enterprises using the Gale–Shapley model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5–8):1907–1916.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5155-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geum Y, Lee S, Park Y (2014) Combining technology roadmap and system dynamics simulation to support scenario-planning: a case of car-sharing service. Comput Ind Eng 71:37–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vilkelis A, Jakovlev S (2014) Outbound supply chain collaboration modelling based on the automotive industry. Transport 29(2):223–230.  https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2013.789980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kurata H (2014) How does inventory pooling work when product availability influences customers’ purchasing decisions? Int J Prod Res 52(22):6739–6759.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.916825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burns LD, Bryant NO (2002) The business of fashion: designing, manufacturing, and marketing. Fairchild BooksGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xiao TJ, Jin JA (2011) Coordination of a fashion apparel supply chain under lead-time-dependent demand uncertainty. Prod Plan Control 22(3):257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.498601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuo TC, Hsu CW, Huang SH, Gong DC (2014) Data sharing: a collaborative model for a green textile/clothing supply chain. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 27(3):266–280.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2013.814157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ma K, Thomassey S, & Zeng X (2018) Development of a central order processing system for optimizing demand-driven textile supply chains: a real case based simulation study. Annals of Operations Research, 1-30. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3000-2
  19. 19.
    Brahmadeep, & Thomassey, S (2014) A simulation based comparison: manual and automatic distribution setup in a textile yarn rewinding unit of a yarn dyeing factory. Simul Model Pract Theory 45:80–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelton W, & Law A (2000) Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw Hill BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keiser S, & Garner M (2012) Beyond design: the synergy of apparel product development. A&C BlackGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saaty TL (2004) Fundamentals of the analytic network process — dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(2):129–157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0158-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saaty TL (1996) The analytic network process. RWS Publications, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. Eur J Oper Res 173(1):211–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.005 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ke Ma
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Sébastien Thomassey
    • 1
  • Xianyi Zeng
    • 1
  • Lichuan Wang
    • 2
  • Yan Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.GEMTEX, ENSAIT (Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Arts et Industries Textiles)RoubaixFrance
  2. 2.College of Textile and Clothing EngineeringSoochow UniversitySuzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of Business Administration and Textile ManagementUniversity of BoråsBoråsSweden
  4. 4.Department of Automation and ProductionUniversity of LilleVilleneuve-d’AscqFrance

Personalised recommendations