Advertisement

Cyber-physical system for thermal stress prevention in 3D printing process

  • Guanxiong Miao
  • Sheng-Jen HsiehEmail author
  • J. A. Segura
  • Jia-Chang Wang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) has been widely applied in the automotive, aerospace, industrial, and medical fields in recent years. However, residual stress and part deformation caused by thermal effects are still significant issues that limit the development of the technology. Improving the temperature control system has been shown to be an efficient way to reduce thermal effects. In this work, nozzle temperature and platform temperature were first studied to provide experimental data for modifying a control system. Identical parts were printed using different settings and distortion was measured for each part. Then, based on the distortion data, a cyber-model was built to predict deformation based on printing settings. The prediction test results show that a linear regression model outperformed an artificial neural network model and a support vector machine model. Based on the linear regression model, a cyber-physical system (CPS) was built to adjust nozzle temperature settings automatically. A performance evaluation experiment showed that this CPS system can reduce the distortion significantly. In future research, printing speed control and platform temperature control will also be included in the CPS system to further decrease the distortion.

Keywords

3D printing FDM Machine learning Cyber-physical systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Texas A&M University, Rockwell Automation, or Taiwan’s Ministry of Education (MOE).

Funding information

This material was partially supported by a Texas A&M University-CONACYT Collaborative Research Grant (No. 230308), by a gift from Rockwell Automation, and by the Additive Manufacturing Center for Mass Customization Production, which is part of the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of Taiwan’s Ministry of Education (MOE) Higher Education Sprout Project.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. MFGLET 3(Supplement C):18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunes V, Peter S, Givargis T, Vahid F (2014) A survey on concepts, applications, and challenges in cyber-physical systems. TIIS 8(12):4242–4268Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajkumar RR, Lee I, Sha L, Stankovic J (2010) Cyber-physical systems: the next computing revolution. ACM:731–736Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baheti R, Gill H (2011) Cyber-physical systems. The Impact of Control Technology 12:161–166Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herterich MM, Uebernickel F, Brenner W (2015) The impact of cyber-physical systems on industrial services in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 30:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee J, Lapira E, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2013) Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. MFGLET 1(1):38–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang L, Törngren M, Onori M (2015) Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 37(Part 2):517–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crump SS (1992) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss KP, Bagrets N, Lange C, Goldacker W, Wohlgemuth J (2015) Thermal and mechanical properties of selected 3D printed thermoplastics in the cryogenic temperature regime. IOP CONF SER MATER SCI ENG 102(1):012022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Rapid manufacturing technologies, rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caffrey T (2013) Additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry annual worldwide progress report. EMR 2(1):209–222Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellehumeur C, Li L, Sun Q, Gu P (2004) Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process. J Manuf Process 6(2):170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2009) Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Mater Des 30(10):4243–4252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Es-Said OS, Foyos J, Noorani R, Mendelson M, Marloth R, Pregger BA (2000) Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater Manuf Process 15(1):107–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910008912976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang Y, Chou K (2008) A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 222(8):959–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Chou Y (2006) Three-dimensional finite element analysis simulations of the fused deposition modelling process. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 220(10):1663–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sahu RK, Mahapatra S, Sood AK (2013) A study on dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) processed parts using fuzzy logic. IJMSP 13(3):183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement 81:174–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kantaros A, Karalekas D (2013) Fiber Bragg grating based investigation of residual strains in ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling process. Mater Des 50:44–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang T-M, Xi J-T, Jin Y (2007) A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(11):1087–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0556-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14(2):72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dinwiddie RB, Love LJ, Rowe JC (2013) Real-time process monitoring and temperature mapping of a 3D polymer printing process. SPIE defense, security, and sensing. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 87050LGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou X, Hsieh S-J, Sun Y (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation of the thermal behaviour of polylactic acid during the fused deposition process. Virtual Phys Prototy 12(3):221–233.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1317214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nagy HM, Watanabe K, Hirano M (2002) Prediction of sediment load concentration in rivers using artificial neural network model. J Hydraul Eng 128(6):588–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou X, Hsieh S-J, Peng B, Hsieh D (2017) Cycle life estimation of lithium-ion polymer batteries using artificial neural network and support vector machine with time-resolved thermography. Microelectron Reliab 79:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vapnik V (2013) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business mediaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meshram PM, Kanojiya RG (2012) Tuning of PID controller using Ziegler-Nichols method for speed control of DC motor. IEEE, pp 117–122Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ang KH, Chong G, Li Y (2005) PID control system analysis, design, and technology. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 13(4):559–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spoerk M, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Sapkota J, Schuschnigg S, Holzer C (2018) Effect of the printing bed temperature on the adhesion of parts produced by fused filament fabrication. PLAST RUBBER COMPOS 47(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xinhua L, Shengpeng L, Zhou L, Xianhua Z, Xiaohu C, Zhongbin W (2015) An investigation on distortion of PLA thin-plate part in the FDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(5):1117–1126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6893-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guanxiong Miao
    • 1
  • Sheng-Jen Hsieh
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • J. A. Segura
    • 5
  • Jia-Chang Wang
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial DistributionTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Additive Manufacturing Center for Mass Customization ProductionNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  5. 5.Centro de Ingeniería y Desarrollo Industrial (CIDESI)ApodacaMexico

Personalised recommendations