Modeling and application of configuration complexity scale: concept for customized production
- 42 Downloads
In current business environment, many original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are employing mass customization strategies, which have implication on the entire operations of an enterprise and especially influence the character of their assembly processes. Increased product differentiation in context of mass-customized production (MCP) causes significant changes in complexity of assembly systems. Our focus in this paper is on the development of a methodological framework of mass-customized assembly modeling all possible product configurations and variants based on the number and type of assembly components from which final product configurations are completed. Subsequently, we propose an approach to determining the so-called configuration complexity scale based on combinatory used for many years as a foundation of methodologies for assessments of variety. The underlying hypothesis in this study is that configuration complexity scale offers a generic complexity framework for decision-making on variable products and production structures within Industry 4.0 concepts. The presented methodological framework is further applied on a particular case model of mass-customized assembly.
KeywordsMass customization Complexity Assembly Component Configuration Scale
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Slavomir Bednar proposed and designed the generic framework for mass-customized production systems with a calculation model; Slavomir Bednar and Erwin Rauch developed the configuration complexity scale and verified its applicability on a real model of customized production.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Larson JA, MCClellan BE (2017) Capturing loyalty: how to measure, generate, and profit from highly satisfied customers, 1st edn. Praeger, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
- 2.Pine BJ (1992) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition, 1st edn. Harvard Business Review Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 4.Matt DT, Rauch E (2017) Designing assembly lines for mass customization production systems. In: Modrak V (ed) Mass customized manufacturing: theoretical concepts and practical approaches. 1st edn Routledge, New York, pp 15–36Google Scholar
- 7.Rogoll T, Piller F (2004) Product configuration from the customer’s perspective: a comparison of configuration systems in the apparel industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Economic, Technical and Organisational aspects of Product Configuration Systems (PETO 2004), Lyngby, Denmark, pp 179–199Google Scholar
- 10.Fettermann DC, Soares Echveste ME (2014) New product development for mass customization: a systematic review. Prod Manuf Res 2(1):266–290Google Scholar
- 14.Modrak V, Soltysova Z, Modrak J, Behunova A (2014) Reducing impact of negative complexity on sustainability of mass customization. Sustainability 9(11):1–16Google Scholar
- 17.Kull H (2015) Mass customization: opportunities, methods, and challenges for manufacturers. Apress, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 18.Westkämper E, Löffler C (2016) Visionen und strategische Konzepte für das System Produktion. In: Westkämper E, Löffler C (eds) Strategien der Produktion, Springer, Berlin, pp 71–237Google Scholar
- 20.Modrak V (ed) (2017) Mass customized manufacturing: theoretical concepts and practical approaches, first edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hosovsky A, Pitel J, Zidek K, Tothova M, Sarosi J, Cveticanin L (2016) Dynamic characterization and simulation of two-link soft robot arm with pneumatic muscles. Mech Mach Theory 103:98–116.Google Scholar
- 23.Carrasquillo V, Armstrong TJ, Hu SJ (2016) Effect of customer demand in a self-paced mass customization assembly line on worker posture and recovery time: an observation study. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Vol. 60(1), SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, September 2016, p. 913Google Scholar
- 25.Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2017) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng 13:121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0483-0
- 31.Smirnov Y (1999) Manufacturing planning under uncertainty and incomplete information. In: Proceedings of American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium, AAAI Technical Report SS-99-07, Stanford, July 1999, pp 125–129Google Scholar
- 32.Zhu X, Hu SJ, Koren Y, Marin SP (2007) Modeling of manufacturing complexity in mixed-model assembly linesT. J Manuf Sci E-Asme 130(5):1–10Google Scholar
- 35.Suh P (2005) Complexity theory and applications. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 36.Forstner L, Monch L (2013) A heuristic to support make-to-stock, assemble-to-order, and make-to-order decisions in semiconductor supply chains. Simulation Conference (WSC), IEEE:3696–3706Google Scholar
- 37.Meboldt M, Klahn C (eds) (2017) Industrializing additive manufacturing: Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications (AMPA2017), Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 38.Configuration Complexity Calculator, Access Download Link: http://kpii.fvt.tuke.sk/download/CALC.zip (downloadable as *.zip executable application)