Advertisement

Formation of skin surface layer on aluminum foam by friction stir powder incremental forming

  • Ryo MatsumotoEmail author
  • Seishu Mori
  • Masaaki Otsu
  • Hiroshi Utsunomiya
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

To improve strength–mass relationship of a closed-cell type aluminum foam, friction stir powder incremental forming (FSPIF) process was applied to form nonporous skin surface layer on the foam surface from aluminum powder. In this process, the powder was supplied to the surface pores of the foam, and then, the powder and the cell wall near the foam surface were incrementally pressed by a rod-shaped tool without rotation (incremental hammering (IH)) and incrementally stirred by the tool at a very high rotation rate (friction stir incremental forming (FSIF)). The skin layer with a maximum thickness of 1.4 mm was formed on the foam surface without deforming the porous structure of the inside of the foam under the forming conditions, a tool rotation rate of 8000 rpm, a tool feed rate of 60 mm/min, and a total forming depth of 10 mm. The formation mechanism of the skin layer from the powder was investigated by microscope observation. Due to combination of sandwich structure and increase of bulk density, the specific plateau stress and the plateau end strain of the foam specimen with the skin layers were improved up to 1.2–1.6 times greater in a uniaxial compression test.

Keywords

Aluminum foam Incremental forming Friction stir Skin layer Sandwich structure Strength–mass relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Shinko Wire Company, Ltd., for providing the aluminum foam (ALPORAS) used in this study.

Funding

This study was financially supported in part by the Light Metal Educational Foundation, Inc.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids—structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashby MF, Evans A, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559–632.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu L, Chen GF (2014) Porous materials: processing and applications. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeenager VK, Pancholi V (2014) Influence of cell wall microstructure on the energy absorption capability of aluminium foam. Mater Des 56:454–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Altenaiji M, Guan ZW, Cantwell WJ, Zhao Y, Schleyer GK (2014) Characterisation of aluminium matrix syntactic foams under drop weight impact. Mater Des 59:296–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nammi SK, Edwards G, Shirvani H (2016) Effect of cell-size on the energy absorption features of closed-cell aluminium foams. Acta Astronaut 128:243–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.06.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dou R, Zhang X, Hao Q, Ju Y, Hu Y (2016) Simulation analysis of effect of porosity on compression behavior and energy absorption properties of aluminum foam sandwich panels. Mater Trans 57:33–36.  https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M2015310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Z, Li Z, Ning J, Zhan L (2009) Effect of heat treatments on the crushing behaviour and energy absorbing performance of aluminium alloy foams. Mater Des 30:977–982.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mirbagheri SMH, Vali H, Soltani H (2017) Heat treatment of closed-cell A356 + 4 wt.%cu + 2 wt.%Ca foam and its effect on the foam mechanical behavior. J Mater Eng Perform 26:14–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2425-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pinto P, Peixinho N, Silva F, Soares D (2014) Compressive properties and energy absorption of aluminum foams with modified cellular geometry. J Mater Process Technol 214:571–577.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hangai Y, Kamada H, Utsunomiya T, Kitahara S, Kuwazuru O, Yoshikawa N (2013) Compression properties of three-layered functionally graded ADC12 aluminum foam fabricated by friction stir welding. Mater Trans 54:1268–1273.  https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.ME201312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Challis VJ, Xu X, Zhang LC, Roberts AP, Grotowski JF, Sercombe TB (2014) High specific strength and stiffness structures produced using selective laser melting. Mater Des 63:783–788.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seeliger HW (2002) Manufacture of aluminum foam sandwich (AFS) components. Adv Eng Mater 4:753–758.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<753::AID-ADEM753>3.0.CO;2-Y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duarte I, Krstulović-Opara L, Vesenjak M (2015) Characterisation of aluminium alloy tubes filled with aluminium alloy integral-skin foam under axial compressive loads. Compos Struct 121:154–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumaraswamidhas LA, Rajak DK, Das S (2016) An investigation on axial deformation behavior of thin-wall unfilled and filled tube with aluminum alloy (Al-Si7Mg) foam reinforced with SiC particles. J Mater Eng Perform 25:3430–3438.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2175-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lobos J, Suzuki S, Nakajima H, Ji YS, Fujii H, Terada D, Tsuji N (2009) Structural change and improvement of the mechanical properties of a lotus-type porous copper by wire-brushing. J Phys Conf Ser 165:012070.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/165/1/012070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuda K, Koriyama S, Paiboon ST, Suzuki S, Asakawa M, Ide T, Nakajima H (2013) The effects of structures and mechanical properties of lotus-type porous copper by shot peening process. J Jpn Inst Copper 52:92–96 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Otsu M, Ichikawa T, Matsuda M, Takashima K (2009) Development of friction stir incremental forming process for forming sheet metals. Proceedings of the Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials XVIII 1963-1972Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matsumoto R, Tsuruoka H, Otsu M, Utsunomiya H (2015) Fabrication of skin layer on aluminum foam surface by friction stir incremental forming and its mechanical properties. J Mater Process Technol 218:23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miyoshi T, Itoh M, Akiyama S, Kitahara A (2000) ALPORAS aluminum foam: production process, properties, and applications. Adv Eng Mater 2:179–183.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200004)2:4<179::AID-ADEM179>3.0.CO;2-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matsumoto R, Mori S, Otsu M, Utsunomiya H (2016) Thickness increase of skin layer on aluminum foam surface and compressive strength by combination of friction stir incremental forming and incremental hammering. J Jpn Inst Light Met 66:419–425. (in Japanese).  https://doi.org/10.2464/jilm.66.419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ISO 17340 (2014) Metallic materials – ductility testing – high speed compression test for porous and cellular metalsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Materials and Manufacturing ScienceOsaka UniversitySuitaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of FukuiFukuiJapan

Personalised recommendations