Advertisement

Quality of surface and subsurface layers after WEDM aluminum alloy 7475-T7351 including analysis of TEM lamella

  • K. Mouralova
  • L. Benes
  • R. Zahradnicek
  • J. Bednar
  • P. Hrabec
  • T. Prokes
  • R. Matousek
  • Z. Fiala
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) is an unconventional machining method indispensable especially for the aeronautical and automotive industries. In this context, the effective manufacturing of high surface quality components from aluminum alloy 7475-T7351 requires comprehensive knowledge of the applied production procedures. We therefore performed a designed experiment comprising 33 cycles (with systematic alteration of machine setting parameters such as gap voltage, pulse on time, pulse off time, discharge current, and wire feed), enabling us to evaluate systematically the cutting speeds in the relevant samples. The machined areas were subjected to a thorough analysis involving both the surface and the subsurface layers. The actual topography was assessed using a non-contact profiler, and the entire operation concentrated on 12 parameters within the areal, profile, and basic and bearing profile categories. To observe the surface relief, we employed several instruments, including the semi-contact atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique, a digital microscope, and a non-contact 3D profiler. Another major step then consisted in examining the morphology and surface defects, a process suitably complemented with a chemical composition analysis (EDX). The distribution of individual elements within the material was investigated in detail using a lamella, whose subsequent inspection relied on a transmission electron microscope (TEM) as the principal tool. To study the subsurface layer and its defects, we prepared metallographic specimens (cross-sections) of the samples and observed them by means of light and electron microscopes.

Keywords

WEDM Electrical discharge machining Aluminum alloy 7475-T7351 Morphology Topography TEM lamella Design of experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding

Part of the work was carried out with the support of CEITEC Nano Research Infrastructure (ID LM2015041, MEYS CR, 2016–2019), CEITEC Brno University of Technology.

This paper is an output of the research and scientific activities of NETME Centre, supported through project NETME CENTRE PLUS (LO1202) from funds of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports under “National Sustainability Programme I.”

This work was supported by BUT grant FSI-S-17-4785 “Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.”

The article was supported from project no. FEKT-S-17-3934, utilization of novel findings in micro and nanotechnologies for complex electronic circuits and sensor applications.

This research was supported by the BUT, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno, Specific research 2016, with the grant “Research of modern production technologies for specific applications,” FSI-S-16-3717 and technical support of Intemac Solutions, Ltd., Kurim.

This work was supported through an internal grant provided by Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, titled SGS (Student Grant Competition), No. 0004/2015, and also in part by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic, programme NPU1, project No. LO1207.

This research has been financially supported by the Specific University Research grant of Brno University of Technology, FEKT/STI-J-18-5354.

References

  1. 1.
    Jain VK (2009) Advanced machining processes, Allied publishers ISBN 81-7764-294-4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jameson EC (2001) Electrical discharge machining. Publisher Society of Manufacturing Engineers ISBN 08-726-3521-XGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ho KH, Newman ST (2003) State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(13):1287–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ho KH, Newman ST, Rahimifard S, Allen RD (2004) State of the art in wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(12):1247–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knight WA, Boothroyd G (2005) Fundamentals of metal machining and machine tools, 3rd edn. CRC Press ISBN 1-57444-659-2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakai T, Miura H, Goloborodko A, Sitdikov O (2009) Continuous dynamic recrystallization during the transient severe deformation of aluminum alloy 7475. Acta Mater 57(1):153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selvakumar G, Sornalatha G, Sarkar S, Mitra S (2014) Experimental investigation and multi-objective optimization of wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) of 5083 aluminum alloy. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 24(2):373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rozenek M, Kozak J, Dabrowski L, Lubkowski K (2001) Electrical discharge machining characteristics of metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 109(3):367–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Somashekhar KP, Ramachandran N, Mathew J (2010) Material removal characteristics of microslot (kerf) geometry in μ-WEDM on aluminum. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(5):611–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prakash JU, Moorthy TV, Peter JM (2013) Experimental investigations on machinability of aluminium alloy (A413)/Flyash/B4C hybrid composites using wire EDM. Procedia Eng 64:1344–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Selvakumar G, Sarkar S, Mitra S (2013) An experimental analysis of single pass cutting of aluminium 5083 alloy in different corner angles through WEDM. Int J Mach Mach Mater 13(2-3):262–275Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srivastava A, Dixit AR, Tiwari S (2014) Experimental investigation of wire EDM process parameteres on aluminum metal matrix composite Al2024/SiC. Int J Adv Res Innov 2:511–515Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patil NG, Brahmankar PK (2010) Some studies into wire electro-discharge machining of alumina particulate-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(5):537–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mouralova K, Matousek R, Kovar J, Mach J, Klakurkova L, Bednar J (2016) Analyzing the surface layer after WEDM depending on the parameters of a machine for the 16MnCr5 steel. Measurement 94:771–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mouralova K, Kovar J, Klakurkova L, Bednar J, Benes L, Zahradnicek R (2018) Analysis of surface morphology and topography of pure aluminium machined using WEDM. Measurement 114:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mouralova K, Kovar, Klakurkova L, Prokes T, Horynova M (2017) Comparison of morphology and topography of surfaces of WEDM machined structural materials. Measurement 104:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mouralova K, Kovar J, Klakurkova L, Blazik P, Kalivoda M, Kousal P (2018) Analysis of surface and subsurface layers after WEDM for Ti-6Al-4V with heat treatment. Measurement 116:556–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mouralova K (2015) Moderní technologie drátového elektroerozivního rezání kovových slitin. Thesis. Brno: CERM ISBN 80-214-2131-2Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Montgomery DC (2013) Design and analysis of experiments, 18th edn. John Wiley & Sons ISBN 978-1118146927-XGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    (1996) Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - surface texture: profile method; Surfaces having stratified functional properties - part 2: height characterization using the linear material ratio curve. ISO 13565-2. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    (2012) Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -surface texture: areal -part 2: terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. ISO 25178-2. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    (1997) Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) -Surface texture: profile method -Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. ISO 4287. Geneva: International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petropoulos GP, Pandazaras CN, Davim JP (2010) Surface texture characterization and evaluation related to machining. Surface integrity in machining. 37-66Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiang XJ, Whitehouse DJ (2012) Technological shifts in surface metrology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):815–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thoma H, Peri L, Lato E (2015) Evaluation of wood surface roughness depending on species characteristics. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología 17(2):285–292Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harcarik M, Jankovych R (2016) Relationship between values of profile and areal surface texture parameters. MM Sci J 5:1659–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Han F, Jiang J, Yu D (2007) Influence of machining parameters on surface roughness in finish cut of WEDM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McGeough JA (1988) Advanced methods of machining. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar A, Kumar V, Kumar J (2013) Experimental investigation on material transfer mechanism in WEDM of pure titanium (Grade-2). Adv Mater Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/847876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kumar A, Kumar V, Kumar J (2013) Multi-response optimization of process parameters based on response surface methodology for pure titanium using WEDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9-12):2645–2668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang CA, Hsu FY, Yao SJ (2004) Microstructure analysis of the martensitic stainless steel surface fine-cut by the wire electrode discharge machining (WEDM). Mater Sci Eng A 371(1):119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Huang CA, Hsu CC, Kuo HH (2003) The surface characteristics of P/M high-speed steel (ASP 23) multi-cut with wire electrical discharge machine (WEDM). J Mater Process Technol 140(1):298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mouralova K, Kovar J, Klakurkova L (2017) Quality of aluminium alloy surface after WEDM. MM Sci J:1679–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Atzeni E, Bassoli E, Gatto A, Iuliano L, Minetola P, Salmi A (2015) 901 Surface and sub surface evaluation in coated-wire electrical dis- 902 charge machining (WEDM) of INCONEL® alloy 718. Procedia 903 CIRP 33:388–393Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brno University of TechnologyFaculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Brno University of TechnologyFaculty of Electrical Engineering and CommunicationBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.INTEMAC Solutions Ltd.KurimCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations