Machining of GTAW additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V structures

  • N. Hoye
  • D. Cuiuri
  • R. A. Rahman Rashid
  • S. PalanisamyEmail author


Titanium components such as spars, brackets and landing gear assemblies, containing deep pockets, thin walls and fixturing holes are used in almost all aircraft. The traditional method of fabricating these parts involves significant amount of machining resulting in unsustainably high buy-to-fly ratios. For this reason, additive manufacturing (AM) processes are being considered for making near-net shape components. Gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) is an economical AM process with higher deposition rates which has been employed to fabricate these titanium components. However, the GTAW-fabricated parts require post-finish machining to meet the strict dimensional tolerances as per design. On the other hand, it is well known that titanium is a difficult-to-machine material. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate the machinability of Ti-6Al-4V thin wall and pad structures produced using GTAW additive manufacturing in terms of cutting forces, surface roughness and tool wear during milling and drilling operations. The cutting forces were found to be lower by about 13–21% during milling owing to the lower hardness of the additively manufactured wall in comparison to the wrought T-fillet structure. In contrast, the normal drilling force was higher by about 10–15% for the additively manufactured pad due to its higher hardness as compared to the wrought Ti-6Al-4V billet, though the tool wear was noticed to be higher when drilling the wrought billet. Nevertheless, it was concluded that the machinability of the GTAW-fabricated Ti-6Al-4V was better than the wrought counterpart.


Gas tungsten arc welding Additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V Milling Drilling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Defence Materials Technology Centre (DMTC) for carrying out this work. The authors also acknowledge the assistance provided by Seco Tools for the milling trials and Sutton Tools for the drilling trials, results from which are presented in this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM (1997) Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. J Mater Process Technol 68:262–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.K. Wessel (2004) The handbook of advanced materials: enabling new designs, John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rahman Rashid R, Bermingham M, Sun S, Wang G, Dargusch M (2013) The response of the high strength Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al beta titanium alloy to laser assisted cutting. Precis Eng 37:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bermingham MJ, Kent D, Zhan H, StJohn DH, Dargusch MS (2015) Controlling the microstructure and properties of wire arc additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V with trace boron additions. Acta Mater 91:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bermingham MJ, Palanisamy S, Morr D, Andrews R, Dargusch MS (2014) Advantages of milling and drilling Ti-6Al-4V components with high-pressure coolant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Attar H, Ehtemam-Haghighi S, Kent D, Dargusch MS (2018) Recent developments and opportunities in additive manufacturing of titanium-based matrix composites: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 133:85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Markillie (2012) A third industrial revolution: special report manufacturing and innovation, Economist NewspaperGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herzog D, Seyda V, Wycisk E, Emmelmann C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater 117:371–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qiu C, Ravi GA, Dance C, Ranson A, Dilworth S, Attallah MM (2015) Fabrication of large Ti–6Al–4V structures by direct laser deposition. J Alloys Compd 629:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vilaro T, Colin C, Bartout JD (2011) As-fabricated and heat-treated microstructures of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy processed by selective laser melting. Metall Mater Trans A 42:3190–3199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bermingham MJ, Thomson-Larkins J, John DHS, Dargusch MS (2018) Sensitivity of Ti-6Al-4V components to oxidation during out of chamber wire + arc additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 258:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murr LE, Quinones SA, Gaytan SM, Lopez MI, Rodela A, Martinez EY, Hernandez DH, Martinez E, Medina F, Wicker RB (2009) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti–6Al–4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2:20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma Y, Cuiuri D, Hoye N, Li H, Pan Z (2015) The effect of location on the microstructure and mechanical properties of titanium aluminides produced by additive layer manufacturing using in-situ alloying and gas tungsten arc welding. Mater Sci Eng A 631:230–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brandl E, Baufeld B, Leyens C, Gault R (2010) Additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V using welding wire: comparison of laser and arc beam deposition and evaluation with respect to aerospace material specifications. Phys Procedia 5:595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Escobar-Palafox G, Gault R, Ridgway K (2011) Robotic manufacturing by shaped metal deposition: state of the art. Ind Robot 38:622–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pan Z, Ding D, Wu B, Cuiuri D, Li H, Norrish J (2018) Arc welding processes for additive manufacturing: a review, in. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Short AB (2009) Gas tungsten arc welding of α + β titanium alloys: a review. Mater Sci Technol 25:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ben V, Jean-Pierre K (2007) Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts. Rapid Prototyp J 13:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luca F, Emanuele M, Pierfrancesco R, Alberto M, Simon H, Konrad W (2010) Ductility of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by selective laser melting of prealloyed powders. Rapid Prototyp J 16:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.J. Donachie (2000) Titanium: a technical guide, ASM internationalGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williams SW, Martina F, Addison AC, Ding J, Pardal G, Colegrove P (2016) Wire + arc additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 32:641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rahman Rashid R, Sun S, Wang G, Dargusch M (2011) Machinability of a near beta titanium alloy. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 225:2151–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bermingham MJ, Schaffarzyk P, Palanisamy S, Dargusch MS (2014) Laser-assisted milling strategies with different cutting tool paths. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1487–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rahman Rashid RA, Palanisamy S, Sun S, Dargusch MS (2016) Tool wear mechanisms involved in crater formation on uncoated carbide tool when machining Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:1457–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bolar G, Das A, Joshi SN (2018) Measurement and analysis of cutting force and product surface quality during end-milling of thin-wall components. Measurement 121:190–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wojciechowski S, Maruda RW, Barrans S, Nieslony P, Krolczyk GM (2017) Optimisation of machining parameters during ball end milling of hardened steel with various surface inclinations. Measurement 111:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Salgado MA (2007) Toolpath selection based on the minimum deflection cutting forces in the programming of complex surfaces milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:388–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cheng K (2009) Machining dynamics fundamentals. Applications and Practices, Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Armarego EJA, Deshpande NP (1991) Computerized end-milling force predictions with cutting models allowing for eccentricity and cutter deflections. CIRP Ann 40:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:465–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wojciechowski S, Maruda RW, Krolczyk GM, Niesłony P (2018) Application of signal to noise ratio and grey relational analysis to minimize forces and vibrations during precise ball end milling. Precis Eng 51:582–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Palanisamy, R. Rashid, M. Brandt, S. Sun, M. Dargusch (2014) Comparison of endmill tool coating performance during machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Adv Mat Res 974Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li R, Hegde P, Shih AJ (2007) High-throughput drilling of titanium alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hoye N, Li HJ, Cuiuri D, Paradowska A (2014) Measurement of residual stresses in titanium aerospace components formed via additive manufacturing, in: 7th International Conference on Mechanical Stress Evaluation by Neutrons and Synchrotron Radiation, MECA SENS 2013. Sydney, NSW, pp 124–129Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    N. Hoye, H. Li, D. Cuiuri, A. Paradowska, K. Thorogood (2014) Investigation of residual stresses in titanium aerospace components formed via additive manufacturing. In: Das R, John S (eds) 8th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics, ACAM 2014, as Part of Engineers Australia Convention 2014, Engineers Australia, pp. 933–941Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Defence Materials Technology CentreHawthornAustralia
  3. 3.School of Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and TechnologySwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations