Parametric study on influence function in magnetorheological finishing of single crystal silicon
- 50 Downloads
Magnetorheological finishing (MRF), a precision polishing process, becomes an integral part of optics manufacturing industries for its ability to improve figure and surface finish of complex shape optics without introducing surface damage. It employs magnetically stiffened magnetorheological fluid (MR) ribbon as a flexible polishing tool which moves through the converging gap against workpiece. Material removal characteristic of a polishing tool is described as influence function. Influence function is a parameter to evaluate the efficiency or effectiveness of the polishing process. It provides some useful information for setting up appropriate process parameters to finish different surfaces. Rotational speed of the carrier wheel and gap between the workpiece and magnet are the selected process parameters for studying the influence function. The spot (or influence function) profiles are analyzed to calculate the volume of material removal and depth of the deepest penetration (ddp) using 3D noncontact profilometer. The maximum contribution is made by wheel speed on the volume of material removal and depth of the deepest penetration. To observe the effect of selected parameter setting on the surface topography, final experimentation is performed by employing longitudinal and cross feed and it is perceived that surface generated by cross feed is more uniform.
KeywordsMagnetorheological finishing Influence function Silicon Material removal rate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors acknowledge the funding support from the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur under ISIRD grant, Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS) under young scientist research award (34/20/10/2015/BRNS).
- 1.Schinhaerl M, Smith G, Geiss A, Smith L, Rascher R, Sperber P, Pitschke E, Stamp R (2007) Calculation of MRF influence functions, Proc. SPIE 6671, Opt Manuf Test VII, 66710Y; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.730806.
- 3.Tricard M, Dumas PR, Golini D (2004) New industrial applications of magnetorheological finishing (MRF). Frontiers in optics. OSA techndical digest (CD), Paper OMD1. Optical Society of America; https://doi.org/10.1364/OFT.2004.OMD1.
- 6.Hallock B, Dumas P, Shorey A, Tricard M (2004) Recent advances in deterministic low-cost finishing of sapphire windows. Proceedings of SPIE 5786: 154–64Google Scholar
- 8.Jacobs SD, Arrasmith SA, Kozhinova IA, Gregg LL, Shorey AB, Ramanofsky HJ, Golini D, Kordonski WI, Hogan S (2000) An Overview of Magnetorheological Finishing (MRF) for Precision Optics Manufacturing (Invited Contribution). Ceram Trans 10:185–200.Google Scholar
- 9.Arrasmith SR, Kozhinova IA, Gregg LL, Shorey AB, Romanofsky HJ, Jacobs SD, Golini D, Kordonski WI, Hogan SJ, Dumas P (1999) Details of the polishing spot in magnetorheological finishing (MRF). Proc. SPIE 3782, Opt Manuf Test III, 92–100; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.369175.
- 12.Rosenweig RE (1985) Ferrohydrodynamics. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.Sidpara A, Jain VK (2017) Magnetorhelogical finishing. In: Jain VK (ed) Nanofinishing science and technology: Basic and Advanced finishing and polishing process. CRC Press, USAGoogle Scholar
- 14.Schinhaerl M, Geiss A, Rascher R, Sperber P, Stamp R, Smith L, Smith G, Pitschke E (2006) Coherences between influence function size, polishing quality, and process time in magnetorheological finishing. Proc. SPIE 6288, Current Developments in Lens Design and Optical Engineering VII, 62880Q1–9; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.678720.
- 17.Schinhaerl M, Rascher R, Stamp R, Smith G, Smith L, Pitschke E, Sperber P (2007) Filter algorithm for influence functions in the computer controlled polishing of high-quality optical lenses. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(1):107–111Google Scholar
- 18.Schinhaerl M, Schneider F, Rascher R, Vogt C, Sperber P (2010) Relationship between influence function accuracy and polishing quality in magnetorheological finishing. Proc SPIE 7655, 5th International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies: Advanced Optical Manufacturing Technologies, 76550YGoogle Scholar
- 19.Jacobs SD, Kordonski W, Prokhorov IV, Golini D, Gorodkin GR, Strafford DT (1998) Magnetorheological fluid composition. US Patent 5,804,095Google Scholar
- 20.Montgomery DC (2009) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. John Wiley and Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
- 21.Huang J, Zhang JQ, Liu JN (2005) Effect of magnetic field on properties of MR fluid. Int J Mod Phys B 19:597–601Google Scholar
- 23.Preston FW (1927) The theory and design of plate glass finishing machines. J Soc Glas Technol 11:214Google Scholar