Machining β-titanium alloy under carbon dioxide snow and micro-lubrication: a study on tool deflection, energy consumption, and tool damage
- 84 Downloads
The alloys of the beta allotropic form of titanium are among the most difficult-to-cut materials. An extremely poor machinability calls for special ways of performing machining with an emphasis on developing new methods of heat dissipation. The paper focuses on evaluating effectiveness of using CO2 snow as a coolant in continuous machining of a β-titanium alloy. It also explores the most appropriate location of its application in the cutting area and usefulness of its hybridization with minimum quantity of lubrication. The effectiveness of using the two cutting fluids is compared with an emulsion-based flood coolant. The effects of varying work material’s yield strength and cutting speed are also investigated. The measured responses include tool displacement area (a measure of tool deflection obtained from tool acceleration data), cutting energy consumed (obtained from acoustic emissions data), and tool wear. The results show that the usage of CO2 snow and its location of application possess a significant effect on the responses. The combination of CO2 snow and minimum quantity of lubrication is found to be the most effective way of heat dissipation and lubrication. With regard to tool damage, the scanning electron microscopy shows the presence of gradual wear and cutting speed-dependent adhesion but no evidence of chipping. The paper also presents a possibility of estimating tool damage condition through acoustic emission and tool deflection data. In this regard, a strong uphill relationship between tool wear and cutting energy is observed.
KeywordsAcoustic emission Minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) Emulsion Grooving Cutting speed
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Rahman MM, Khan MAR, Kadirgama K, Noor MM, Bakar RA (2010) Modeling of material removal on machining of Ti-6Al-4V through EDM using copper tungsten electrode and positive polarity. World academy of science, engineering and technology, 71:576–581.Google Scholar
- 7.Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Metal cutting, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 9.Zlatin N, Field M (1972) Procedures and precautions in machining titanium alloys. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Titanium Sci. & Tech., CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kirk DC (1976–7) Tools and dies for industry. In: Proceedings of Conference 76/77, Metallurgy Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 12.Freeman RM (1974) The machining of titanium and some of its alloys. University of Birmingham, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
- 13.Donachie MJ (2000) Titanium—a technical guide. ASM International, OhioGoogle Scholar
- 25.Maradei C, Piotrkowski R, Serrano E, Ruzzante JE (2003) Acoustic emission signal analysis in machining processes using wavelet packets. Lat Am Appl Res 33(4)Google Scholar
- 28.Maia LHA, Abrao AM, Vasconcelos WL, Sales WF, Machado AR (2015) A new approach for detection of wear mechanisms and determination of tool life in turning using acoustic emission. Tribol Int:92519–92532Google Scholar
- 33.Duan X, Peng F, Yan R, Zhu Z Li B (2014) Experimental study on cutter deflection in multi-axis NC machining. In: Int. Conf. Intelligent Robotics and Applications. Springer International Publishing, pp 99–109Google Scholar
- 35.Mehta P, Mears L (2011) Model based prediction and control of machining deflection error in turning slender bars. In: ASME 2011 Int. Manuf. Sci. & Eng. Conf., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 263–271Google Scholar