Incorporating draw constraint in the lightweight and self-supporting optimisation process for selective laser melting
- 83 Downloads
Due to the manufacturing ability of selective laser melting (SLM) in complex lightweight structures resulting from topology optimisation (TO), SLM and TO are considered to be the best combination. However, support structures are required for SLM processes because of the very complex lightweight structures resulting from TO. Support structures also help resist the thermal stress which can damage the part. On the other hand, support structures have some shortcomings including the difficulty of removing them from the original part and the increases in the total cost and manufacturing time. Because of the above-mentioned deficiencies, more research will be conducted in the near future to investigate the design of self-supporting components for SLM technology. Therefore, this study proposes a new design method, called topology optimisation design with draw constraint (TODDC). The proposed method can simultaneously realise lightweight and self-supporting design for SLM processes. The detailed design process is presented and its advantages are discussed. The most significant advantage of the proposed method is that topology optimisation will be the final design tool not only for the conceptual design but also for the industrial component. TO is applied in the design process to reduce weight and draw constraint is imported into the TO process to meet the self-supporting requirement. As for the industrial implications of the research, a control arm component is designed using the proposed method, and the final model is produced successfully using the SLM technology. Thus, the effectiveness of the proposed method in designing lightweight and self-supporting industrial metal components for SLM processes is verified through the case study.
KeywordsTopology optimisation Selective laser melting Lightweight Self-supporting Draw constraint
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
All authors thank the valuable comments and suggestions of the editors of The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology and the anonymous referees which helped improve the presentation and quality of the manuscript.
This research was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Project No. 2015AA042501) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51775521).
- 2.Allaire G, Dapogny C, Faure A, Michailidis G (2017b) A model of layer by layer mechanical constraint for additive manufacturing in shape and topology optimization. Paper presented at the 12th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO12)Google Scholar
- 4.Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual international solid freeform fabrication symposiumGoogle Scholar
- 7.Driessen, A. (2016). Overhang constraint in topology optimisation for additive manufacturing: a density gradient based approachGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gu W (2013) On challenges and solutions of topology optimization for aerospace structural design. 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary OptimizationGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hoffarth M, Gerzen N, Pedersen C (2017) ALM overhang constraint in topology optimization for industrial applications. Paper presented at the World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary OptimisationGoogle Scholar
- 11.Krishna LSR, Mahesh N, Sateesh N (2017) Topology optimization using solid isotropic material with penalization technique for additive manufacturing. 4:1414–1422Google Scholar
- 12.Leary M, Babaee M, Brandt M, Subic A (2013) Feasible build orientations for self-supporting fused deposition manufacture: a novel approach to space-filling tesselated geometries. Adv Mater Res 633:148–168. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Materialise (2016) 3D printing software, http://software.materialise.com/magics, Accessed 25 June 2016
- 18.Muir M (2013) Multidisciplinary optimisation of a business jet main exit door hinge for production by additive manufacturing. The 8th UK Altair Technology ConferenceGoogle Scholar
- 21.Seabra, L. M. R. (2015). Design optimisation for selective laser melting (SLM) and experimental testing of an aircraft componentGoogle Scholar
- 23.Thomas D (2009) The development of design rules for selective laser melting. University of WalesGoogle Scholar
- 24.Tomlin M, Meyer J (2011) Topology optimization of an additive layer manufactured (ALM) aerospace part. Paper presented at The 7th Altair CAE Technology Conference, Gaydon, UK, 10th MayGoogle Scholar
- 28.Zhao Z, Guan R, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Bai P (2017) Effects of Process Parameters of Semisolid Stirring on Microstructure of Mg-3Sn-1Mn-3SiC (wt%) Strip Processed by Rheo-rolling. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 30:66–72.Google Scholar