Incorporating draw constraint in the lightweight and self-supporting optimisation process for selective laser melting

  • Zhonghua Li
  • David Zhengwen Zhang
  • Peng Dong
  • Ibrahim Kucukkoc
  • Bai Peikang


Due to the manufacturing ability of selective laser melting (SLM) in complex lightweight structures resulting from topology optimisation (TO), SLM and TO are considered to be the best combination. However, support structures are required for SLM processes because of the very complex lightweight structures resulting from TO. Support structures also help resist the thermal stress which can damage the part. On the other hand, support structures have some shortcomings including the difficulty of removing them from the original part and the increases in the total cost and manufacturing time. Because of the above-mentioned deficiencies, more research will be conducted in the near future to investigate the design of self-supporting components for SLM technology. Therefore, this study proposes a new design method, called topology optimisation design with draw constraint (TODDC). The proposed method can simultaneously realise lightweight and self-supporting design for SLM processes. The detailed design process is presented and its advantages are discussed. The most significant advantage of the proposed method is that topology optimisation will be the final design tool not only for the conceptual design but also for the industrial component. TO is applied in the design process to reduce weight and draw constraint is imported into the TO process to meet the self-supporting requirement. As for the industrial implications of the research, a control arm component is designed using the proposed method, and the final model is produced successfully using the SLM technology. Thus, the effectiveness of the proposed method in designing lightweight and self-supporting industrial metal components for SLM processes is verified through the case study.


Topology optimisation Selective laser melting Lightweight Self-supporting Draw constraint 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



All authors thank the valuable comments and suggestions of the editors of The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology and the anonymous referees which helped improve the presentation and quality of the manuscript.

Funding information

This research was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Project No. 2015AA042501) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51775521).


  1. 1.
    Allaire G, Dapogny C, Estevez R, Faure A, Michailidis G (2017a) Structural optimization under overhang constraints imposed by additive manufacturing processes: an overview of some recent results. J Comput Phys 2(2):385–403zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allaire G, Dapogny C, Faure A, Michailidis G (2017b) A model of layer by layer mechanical constraint for additive manufacturing in shape and topology optimization. Paper presented at the 12th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO12)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beghini LL, Beghini A, Katz N, Baker WF, Paulino GH (2014) Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology optimization. Eng Struct 59:716–726. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual international solid freeform fabrication symposiumGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calignano F (2014) Design optimization of supports for overhanging structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting. Mater Des 64:203–213. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campanelli S, Contuzzi N, Ludovico A, Caiazzo F, Cardaropoli F, Sergi V (2014) Manufacturing and characterization of Ti6Al4V lattice components manufactured by selective laser melting. Materials 7(6):4803–4822. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Driessen, A. (2016). Overhang constraint in topology optimisation for additive manufacturing: a density gradient based approachGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaynor AT, Guest JK (2016) Topology optimization considering overhang constraints: eliminating sacrificial support material in additive manufacturing through design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(5):1157–1172MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gu W (2013) On challenges and solutions of topology optimization for aerospace structural design. 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary OptimizationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoffarth M, Gerzen N, Pedersen C (2017) ALM overhang constraint in topology optimization for industrial applications. Paper presented at the World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary OptimisationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krishna LSR, Mahesh N, Sateesh N (2017) Topology optimization using solid isotropic material with penalization technique for additive manufacturing. 4:1414–1422Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leary M, Babaee M, Brandt M, Subic A (2013) Feasible build orientations for self-supporting fused deposition manufacture: a novel approach to space-filling tesselated geometries. Adv Mater Res 633:148–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leary M, Merli L, Torti F, Mazur M, Brandt M (2014) Optimal topology for additive manufacture: a method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Mater Des 63:678–690. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee Y-S, González JA, Lee JH, Kim YI, Park KC, Han S (2016) Structural topology optimization of the transition piece for an offshore wind turbine with jacket foundation. Renew Energy 85:1214–1225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li Z, Zhang DZ, Dong P, Kucukkoc I (2016) A lightweight and support-free design method for selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1–11):2943–2953. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin CY, Wirtz T, LaMarca F, Hollister SJ (2007) Structural and mechanical evaluations of a topology optimized titanium interbody fusion cage fabricated by selective laser melting process. J Biomed Mater Res A 83((2):272–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Materialise (2016) 3D printing software,, Accessed 25 June 2016
  18. 18.
    Muir M (2013) Multidisciplinary optimisation of a business jet main exit door hinge for production by additive manufacturing. The 8th UK Altair Technology ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qian X (2017) Undercut and overhang angle control in topology optimization: a density gradient based integral approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng 111(3):247–272MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saadlaoui Y, Milan J-L, Rossi J-M, Chabrand P (2017) Topology optimization and additive manufacturing: comparison of conception methods using industrial codes. J Manuf Syst 43:178–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seabra, L. M. R. (2015). Design optimisation for selective laser melting (SLM) and experimental testing of an aircraft componentGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strano G, Hao L, Everson RM, Evans KE (2012) A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1247–1254. Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas D (2009) The development of design rules for selective laser melting. University of WalesGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tomlin M, Meyer J (2011) Topology optimization of an additive layer manufactured (ALM) aerospace part. Paper presented at The 7th Altair CAE Technology Conference, Gaydon, UK, 10th MayGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang D, Yang Y, Liu R, Xiao D, Sun J (2013) Study on the designing rules and processability of porous structure based on selective laser melting (SLM). J Mater Process Technol 213(10):1734–1742. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiao D-M, Yang Y-Q, Su X-B, Di W, Luo Z-Y (2012) Topology optimization of microstructure and selective laser melting fabrication for metallic biomaterial scaffolds. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22(10):2554–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Raymont D (2012) Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 62:32–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao Z, Guan R, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Bai P (2017) Effects of Process Parameters of Semisolid Stirring on Microstructure of Mg-3Sn-1Mn-3SiC (wt%) Strip Processed by Rheo-rolling. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 30:66–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhonghua Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Zhengwen Zhang
    • 2
  • Peng Dong
    • 3
  • Ibrahim Kucukkoc
    • 4
  • Bai Peikang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNorth University of ChinaTaiyuanChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory on Mechanical TransmissionChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Capital Aerospace Machinery Corporation LimitedBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of Industrial EngineeringBalikesir UniversityBalikesirTurkey

Personalised recommendations