Advertisement

Comparative analysis of two CBN grinding wheels performance in nodular cast iron plunge grinding

  • Lucas de Martini FernandesEmail author
  • José Claudio Lopes
  • Roberta Silveira Volpato
  • Anselmo Eduardo Diniz
  • Rodolfo Fischer Moreira de Oliveira
  • Paulo Roberto de Aguiar
  • Hamilton José de Mello
  • Eduardo Carlos Bianchi
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The extensive tribological use of nodular cast iron in ground transport industry, e.g., trains and automobiles, has brought growing scientific interest. The various applications of this material are due to the versatility of mechanical properties without adding alloy elements, making possible to achieve good results varying just the heat treatment. Due to its high fluidity, workpieces made of this material can be produced with final dimensions and shapes very close to the designed ones, making necessary just the use of finishing machining operations to get the final dimensions, more specifically those concerning the grinding process. To optimize cost production, machining processes became the focus of scientists and engineers. The grinding wheel can determine the success of an operation as its properties influence productivity and workpiece quality decisively. This work analyzes the grinding process of the ductile iron GGG-70 (average hardness of 270 HB) using two types of vitrified bonded CBN grinding wheels, which have as their only distinction the marked difference in friability of the abrasive grains. The performance of each grinding wheel will be analyzed taking into account the output parameters values obtained from surface roughness, average power, diametric wear of the grinding wheel, microstructure of the ground surfaces, and microhardness measures from the ground surface to the center of the workpiece. It was observed that the less friable wheel produced, regarding the average surface roughness, values of 0.27, 0.30, and 0.36 μm for the feed rates of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm/min, respectively, and, regarding the diametric wheel wear, produced values of 2.52, 2.99, and 4.01 μm for the same feed rates, respectively. On the other hand, when using the more friable wheel, average surface roughness values of 0.33, 0.44, and 0.64 μm and diametric wheel wear values of 3.21, 4.22, and 7.24 μm were obtained. In this way, the less friable wheel showed better results for all the conditions. Considering the feed rate order of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm/min, the improvement in surface roughness was about 18.18, 31.82, and 43.75%, respectively, and the reduction of the wheel wear was about 21.50, 29.15, and 44.61%.

Keywords

Cylindrical grinding Friability CBN Nodular cast iron 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Group Saint Gobain Ceramic Materials/Surface Conditioning area for its donation of the CBN abrasive grains and for its support of this research, Nikkon Ferramentas de Corte Ltda for providing the grinding wheels and Quimatic Tapmatic Brazil for the donation of the cutting fluid used in this research.

Funding information

This research received financial support from FAPESP and CNPq (Brazil).

References

  1. 1.
    Heisel U, Klocke F, Uhlmann E, Spur G (2014) Handbuch Spanen. Carl Hanser Verlag, Print ISBN: 978-3-446-42826-3. p. 14–17Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denkena B, Grove T, Bremer I, Behrens L (2016) Design of bronze-bonded grinding wheel properties. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rowe WB (2014) Principles of modern grinding technology. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Linke B (2016) Life cycle and sustainability of abrasive tools. Springer, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Novoselov Y, Bratan S, Bogutsky V (2016) Analysis of relation between grinding wheel wear and abrasive grains wear. Procedia Eng 150:809–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jackson MJ (2007) Modelling of fracture wear in vitrified cBN grinding wheels. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 24:230–236Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson MJ, Davim JP (2011) Abrasive tools and bonding systems. Machining with abrasives. Springer Science, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ding W, Zhu Y, Zhang L, Xu J, Fu Y, Liu W, Yang C (2015) Stress characteristics and fracture wear of brazed CBN grains in monolayer grinding wheels. Wear 332-333:800–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu C, Li B, Liu Y, Liang SY (2017) Surface roughness modeling for grinding of silicon carbide ceramics considering co-existence of brittleness and ductility. Int J Mech Sci 133:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sosa AD, Echeverría MD (2015) Surface alterations produced in grinding of austempered ductile iron. Procedia Mater Sci 8:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeng D, Lu L, Zhang N, Gong Y, Zhang J (2017) Influence of a hybrid treatment consisting of fine particle bombardment and powder impact plating on the scuffing behavior of ductile cast iron. Wear 372-373:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iacoviello F, Cocco VD (2016) Influence of the graphite elements morphology on the fatigue crack propagation mechanisms in a ferritic ductile cast iron. Eng Fract Mech 167:248–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bouzakis KD, Bouzakis E, Kombogiannis S, Makrimallakis S, Skordaris G, Michailidis N, Charalampous P, Paraskevopoulou R, M’Saoubi R, Aurich JC, Barthelma F, Biermann D, Denkena B, Dimitrov D, Engin S, Karpuschewski B, Klocke F, O¨ z T, Poulachon G, Rech J, Schulze V, Settineri L, Srivastava A, Wegener K, Uhlmann E, Zeman P (2014) Effect of cutting edge preparation of coated tools on their performance in milling various materials. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aurich JC, Effgen C, Kirsch B (2016) Cutting edge preparation with elastic bonded superabrasive grinding wheels. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuffa M, Kuster F, Wegener K (2016) Comparison of lubrication conditions for grinding of mild steel with electroplated cBN wheel. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 18:53–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taborga JDM (2002) Análise e Monitoramento da Retificação do Ferro Fundido Nodular com Rebolos de Nitreto de Boro Cúbico (CBN). Dissertação de Mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2002Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silva RS, Corrêa ECS, Brandão JR, Ávila RF (2013) Environmentally friendly manufacturing: behavior analysis of minimum quantity of lubricant - MQL in grinding process. J Clean Prod.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.033
  18. 18.
    Taborga ARM, Taborga JDM, Weingaertner WL (2003) Análise da Rugosidade Obtida na Retificação de Ferro Fundido Nodular Utilizando Rebolos de SiC e Al2O3. 2° Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia de Fabricação (2° COBEF)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tönshoff HK, Inasaki I (2001) Sensors in manufacturing. Wiley-VCH publisher, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malkin S, Guo C (2008) Grinding technology: theory and application of machining with abrasivesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas de Martini Fernandes
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Claudio Lopes
    • 1
  • Roberta Silveira Volpato
    • 1
  • Anselmo Eduardo Diniz
    • 1
  • Rodolfo Fischer Moreira de Oliveira
    • 2
  • Paulo Roberto de Aguiar
    • 1
  • Hamilton José de Mello
    • 1
  • Eduardo Carlos Bianchi
    • 1
  1. 1.UNESPBauruBrazil
  2. 2.Saint-Gobain Surface Conditioning - Ceramic MaterialsGuarulhosBrazil

Personalised recommendations