Spectral analysis and power spectral density evaluation in Al2O3 nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication milling of 45 steel

  • Qingan Yin
  • Changhe Li
  • Yanbin Zhang
  • Min Yang
  • Dongzhou Jia
  • Yali Hou
  • Runze Li
  • Lan Dong
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication (NMQL) is one of the main modes of sustainable manufacturing. It is an environment-friendly, energy-saving, and highly efficient lubrication method. With the use of nanoparticles, the tribological properties of debris–tool and workpiece–tool interfaces will change. However, spectrum analyses of force and power spectral density (PSD) of surface microstructures are limited. In the present work, the milling force, friction coefficient, specific energy, surface roughness, and surface microstructure of debris were evaluated in milling of 45 steel for different lubrication conditions, namely, dry, flood, minimum quantity lubrication, and Al2O3 NMQL. Results demonstrated that compared with other lubrication conditions, NMQL achieves minimum milling force peak (Fx = 270 N, Fy = 160 N, Fz = 50 N), friction coefficient (μ = 1.039), specific energy (U = 65.5 J/mm3), and surface roughness value (Ra = 2.254 μm, RSm = 0.0562 mm). Furthermore, a spectrum analysis of the milling force and PSD of the surface microstructure was conducted for validation. The spectral analysis of milling force revealed that NMQL obtained the lowest milling force and amplitude in the middle-frequency region, thereby indicating the minimum abrasion loss of the tool. Meanwhile, the PSD analysis indicated that NMQL had the lowest proportional coefficient in the low-frequency region (0.4766) and the highest proportional coefficient in the high-frequency region (0.0569). These results revealed that the workpiece surface gained by Al2O3 NMQL obtained higher wave fineness than other working conditions. By combining with the lowest Ra, NMQL contributes the best workpiece surface quality. Therefore, machining experiments using NMQL showed the best lubrication performance.

Keywords

Minimum quantity lubrication Al2O3 nanoparticles Spectrum analysis Power spectral density Tribological properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Li CH, Hou YL, Xiu SC, Cai GQ (2008) Application of lubrication theory to near-dry-green grinding-feasibility analysis. Adv Mater Res 44-46:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang YB, Li CH, Jia DZ, Zhang DK, Zhang XW (2015) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication performance of MoS2/CNT nanofluid for minimal quantity lubrication in Ni-based alloy grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 99:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang YB, Li CH, Jia DZ, Zhang DK, Zhang XW (2015) Experimental evaluation of MoS2 nanoparticles in jet MQL grinding with different types of vegetable oil as base oil. J Clean Prod 871:930–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ding WF, Zhang LC, Li Z, Zhu YJ, Su HH, Xu JH (2017) Review on grinding-induced residual stresses in metallic materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:2939–2968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ding WF, Barbara L, Zhu YJ, Li Z, Fu YC, Su HH, Xu JH (2017) Review on monolayer CBN superabrasive wheels for grinding metallic materials. Chin J Aeronaut 30:109–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xi XX, Ding WF, Li Z, Xu JH (2017) High speed grinding of particulate reinforced titanium matrix composites using a monolayer brazed cubic boron nitride wheel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:1529–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li Z, Ding WF, Liu CJ, Su HH (2017) Prediction of grinding temperature of PTMCs based on the varied coefficients of friction in conventional-speed and high-speed surface grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:2335–2344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mao C, Tang XJ, Zou HF, Huang XM, Zhou ZX (2012) Investigation of grinding characteristic using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Precis Eng Man 13:1745–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang YG, Li CH, Zhang YB, Yang M, Li BK, Jia DZ, Hou YL, Mao C (2016) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication properties of the wheel/workpiece interface in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding using different types of vegetable oils. J Clean Prod 127:487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang XP, Li CH, Zhang YB, Wang YG, Li BK, Yang M, Guo SM, Liu GT, Zhang NQ (2016) Lubricating property of MQL grinding of Al2O3/SiC mixed nanofluid with different particle sizes and microtopography analysis by cross-correlation. Precis Eng 47:532–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang YG, Li CH, Zhang YB, Li BK, Yang M, Zhang XP, Guo SM, Liu GT (2016) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication properties of the wheel/workpiece interface in MQL grinding with different nanofluids. Tribol Int 99:198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang YB, Li CH, Ji HJ, Yang XH, Yang M, Jia DZ, Zhang XP, Li RZ, Wang J (2017) Analysis of grinding mechanics and improved predictive force model based on material-removal and plastic-stacking mechanisms. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 122:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li CH, Li JY, Wang S, Jia DZ (2013) Modeling and numerical simulation of the grinding temperature distribution with nano-particle jet of MQL. Adv in Mech Eng 7:167–181Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li BK, Li CH, Zhang YB, Wang YG, Jia DZ, Yang M, Zhang NQ, Wu QD, Han ZG, Sun K (2017) Heat transfer performance of MQL grinding with different nanofluids for Ni-based alloys using vegetable oil. J Clean Prod 154:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang M, Li CH, Zhang YB, Jia DZ, Zhang XP, Hou YL, Li RZ, Wang J (2017) Maximum undeformed equivalent chip thickness for ductile-brittle transition of zirconia ceramics under different lubrication conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 122:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han ZL, Li CH (2010) The application of cutting fluid in grinding process is reviewed. Abras Abras Commun 10:7–12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang DK, Li CH, Zhang YB, Zhou DZ (2015) Zhang XW. Experimental research on the energy ratio coefficient and specific grinding energy in nanoparticle jet MQL grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lv HG (2012) Tool wear of H13 steel hard milling process and its effect on the surface integrity. Shan Dong University 11-77Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liao YS, Lin HM (2007) Mechanism of minimum quantity lubrication in high-speed milling of hardened steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1660–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liao YS, Lin HM, Chen YC (2007) Feasibility study of the minimum quantity lubrication in high-speed end milling of NAK80 hardened steel by coated carbide tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1667–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lacalle LNLD, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Cabanes I (2001) Cutting conditions and tool optimization in the high-speed milling of aluminium alloys. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 215:1257–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shahrom MS, Yahya NM, Yusoff AR (2013) Taguchi method approach on effect of lubrication condition on surface roughness in milling operation. Procedia Eng 53:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kishawy HA, Dumitrescu M, Ng EG, Elbestawi MA (2005) Effect of coolant strategy on tool performance, chip morphology and surface quality during high-speed machining of A356 aluminum alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sultan AA, Okafor AC (2016) Effects of geometric parameters of wavy-edge bull-nose helical end-mill on cutting force prediction in end-milling of Inconel 718 under MQL cooling strategy. J Manuf Process 23:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rahmati B, Sarhan AAD, Sayuti M (2014) Morphology of surface generated by end milling AL6061-T6 using molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanolubrication in end milling machining. J Clean Prod 66:685–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharma AK, Tiwari AK, Dixit AR (2016) Effects of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in machining processes using conventional and nanofluid based cutting fluids: a comprehensive review. J Clean Prod 127:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hadi M, Atefi R (2015) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication with gamma-Al2O3 nanoparticles on surface roughness in milling AISI D3 steel. Ind J Sci Technol 8:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saravanakumar N, Prabu L, Karthik M, Rajamanickam A (2014) Experimental analysis on cutting fluid dispersed with silver nano particles. J Mech Sci Technol 28:645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uysal A, Demiren F, Altan E (2015) Applying minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) method on milling of martensitic stainless steel by using nano MoS2 reinforced vegetable cutting fluid. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:2742–2747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rahmati B, Sarhan AAD, Sayuti M (2014) Investigating the optimum molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanolubrication parameters in CNC milling of AL6061-T6 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:1143–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ming EO, Sayuti M, Sarhan AAD (2015) Fuzzy logic-based approach to investigate the novel uses of nano suspended lubrication in precise machining of aerospace AL tempered grade 6061. J Clean Prod 89:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mao C, Zou HF, Huang XM, Zhang JA, Zhou ZX (2013) The influence of spraying parameters on grinding performance for nanofluids minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:1791–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Okada M, Hosokawa A, Asakawa N, Ueda T (2014) End milling of stainless steel and titanium alloy in an oil mist environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:1255–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yuan SM, Yan LT, Liu WD, Liu Q (2011) Effects of cooling air temperature on cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 211:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Su Y, Gong L, Li B, Liu Z, Chen D (2016) Performance evaluation of nanofluid mql with vegetable-based oil and ester oil as base fluids in turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:2083–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boswell B, Islam MN, Davies IJ, Ginting YR, Ong AK (2017) A review identifying the effectiveness of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) during conventional machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang YG, Li CH, Zhang YB, Li BK, Yang M, Zhang XP, Guo SM, Liu GT, Zhai MG (2017) Comparative evaluation of the lubricating properties of vegetable-oil-based nanofluids between frictional test and grinding experiment. J Manuf Process 26:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang YB, Li CH, Jia DZ, Li BK, Wang YG, Yang M, Hou YL, Zhang XW (2016) Experimental study on the effect of nanoparticle concentration on the lubricating property of nanofluids for MQL grinding of Ni-based alloy. J Mater Process Technol 232:100–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Feng J (2009) Study on Mechanism of Ti6Al4V high speed machining under different cooling lubrication conditions. Shan Dong University 35–38Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oliveira GDP, Fonseca MC, Araujo AC (2017) Analysis of residual stress and cutting force in end milling of Inconel 718 using conventional flood cooling and minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:3265–3272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pathania A, Singh S, Gupta D, Jain V (2015) Development and analysis of tribological behavior of microwave processed EWAC+20% WC10Co2Ni composite cladding on mild steel substrate. J Manuf Process 20:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Guo SM, Li CH, Zhang YB, Wang YG, Li BK, Yang M, Zhang XP, Liu GT (2016) Experimental evaluation of the lubrication performance of mixtures of castor oil with other vegetable oils in MQL grinding of nickel-based alloy. J Clean Prod 140:1060–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mittal RK, Kulkarni SS, Singh RK (2017) Effect of lubrication on machining response and dynamic instability in high-speed micromilling of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process 28:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Štefánia Olejárová DJ, Svetlík J, Pituk M (2017) Measurements and evaluation of measurements of vibrations in steel milling process. Measurement 106:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liu C, Wu JQ, Li GH, Tan GY (2013) Frequency-spectrum characteristics of force in end milling with tool wear and eccentricity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:925–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kang IS, Kim JH, Hong C, Kim JS (2010) Development and evaluation of tool dynamometer for measuring high frequency cutting forces in micro milling. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 11:817–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu P, Xu JH, Fu YC (2011) Cutting force and its frequency spectrum characteristics in high speed milling of titanium alloy with a polycrystalline diamond tool. J ZheJiang Univ 12:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nikoo MF, Azizi H, Parvin N, Naghibi HY (2016) The influence of heat treatment on microstructure and wear properties of friction stir welded AA6061-T6/Al2O3, nanocomposite joint at four different traveling speed. J Manuf Process 22:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mia M, Bashir MA, Khan MA, Dhar NR (2017) Optimization of MQL flow rate for minimum cutting force and surface roughness in end milling of hardened steel (HRC 40). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:675–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang Z, Kovvuri V, Araujo A, Bacci M, Hung WNP, Bukkapatnam STS (2016) Built-up-edge effects on surface deterioration in micromilling processes. J Manuf Process 24:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ho JK, Che HT, Ming YT, Ming XT, Sung JC (2015) Development of a novel cooling system-assisted minimum quantity lubrication method for improvement of milling performance. J Chin Inst Eng 38:322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qingan Yin
    • 1
  • Changhe Li
    • 1
  • Yanbin Zhang
    • 1
  • Min Yang
    • 1
  • Dongzhou Jia
    • 1
  • Yali Hou
    • 1
  • Runze Li
    • 2
  • Lan Dong
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringQingdao University of TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringQingdao Binhai UniversityQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations