High strain rate dynamic behaviour of AlSi12 alloy processed by selective laser melting

  • P. PonnusamyEmail author
  • S. H. Masood
  • D. Ruan
  • S. Palanisamy
  • Rizwan Rashid


Selective laser melting (SLM) is a layer-by-layer metal additive manufacturing process. The parts produced using SLM may be subjected to severe dynamic loading conditions during service. Very little published research exists in understanding the response of 3D printed metal parts subjected to high strain rate loading. The present work is focused on studying the behaviour of SLM processed AlSi12 aluminium alloy parts under quasi-static and high strain rate dynamic compression for specimens built at different orientations and locations. The dynamic compression is carried out at room temperature as well as at an elevated temperature on the split Hopkinson pressure bar at strain rates of 670–840/s and the quasi-static test is conducted at a strain rate of 4 × 10−3/s. The effects of build orientations, strain rate and temperature on mechanical behaviour of AlSi12 specimens are investigated. Also, the microstructure and micro-hardness of the dynamically tested AlSi12 specimens are analysed. Results show that increased temperature in dynamic loading significantly reduces the yield strength and ultimate compressive strength of 3D printed AlSi12 specimens. Flow stress remains almost constant under quasi-static and dynamic loading at room temperature, while it increases with strain rate at high temperature. Build orientation also affects the micro-hardness and yield stress of quasi-statically tested parts with vertical orientation providing maximum values.


Selective laser melting Split Hopkinson pressure bar Quasi-static compression Dynamic testing AlSi12 aluminium alloy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Funding information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Defence Materials Technology Centre (DMTC), Australia. Also, the authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Girish Thipperudrappa for his support towards printing the specimens on SLM.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Yap C, Chua C, Dong Z, Liu Z, Zhang D, Loh L, Sing S (2015) Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):041101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thijs L, Kempen K, Kruth J-P, Van Humbeeck J (2013) Fine-structured aluminium products with controllable texture by selective laser melting of pre-alloyed AlSi10Mg powder. Acta Mater 61(5):1809–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rombouts M, Kruth J-P, Froyen L, Mercelis P (2006) Fundamentals of selective laser melting of alloyed steel powders. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 55(1):187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vrancken B, Thijs L, Kruth J-P, Van Humbeeck J (2012) Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting: microstructure and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd 541:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Louvis E, Fox P, Sutcliffe CJ (2011) Selective laser melting of aluminium components. J Mat Processing Tech 211(2):275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yadroitsev I, Thivillon L, Bertrand P, Smurov I (2007) Strategy of manufacturing components with designed internal structure by selective laser melting of metallic powder. Appl Surf Sci 254(4):980–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strano G, Hao L, Everson R, Evans K (2013) A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1247–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rashid R, Masood S, Ruan D, Palanisamy S, Rashid RR, Brandt M (2017) Effect of scan strategy on density and metallurgical properties of 17-4PH parts printed by selective laser melting (SLM). J Mat Processing Tech 249:502–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu W, Brandt M, Sun S, Elambasseril J, Liu Q, Latham K, Xia K, Qian M (2015) Additive manufacturing of strong and ductile Ti–6Al–4V by selective laser melting via in situ martensite decomposition. Acta Mater 85:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dadbakhsh S, Hao L, Sewell N (2012) Effect of selective laser melting layout on the quality of stainless steel parts. Rapid Prototyp J 18(3):241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caiazzo F, Alfieri V, Corrado G, Argenio P (2017) Laser powder-bed fusion of Inconel 718 to manufacture turbine blades. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(9–12):4023–4031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aboulkhair NT, Everitt NM, Maskery I, Ashcroft I, Tuck C (2017) Selective laser melting of aluminum alloys. MRS Bull 42(4):311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trevisan F, Calignano F, Lorusso M, Pakkanen J, Aversa A, Ambrosio EP, Lombardi M, Fino P, Manfredi D (2017) On the selective laser melting (SLM) of the AlSi10Mg alloy: process, microstructure, and mechanical properties. Materials 10(1):76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kimura T, Nakamoto T (2016) Microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 (AlSi7Mg0. 3) aluminum alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des 89:1294–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chou R, Milligan J, Paliwal M, Brochu M (2015) Additive manufacturing of Al-12Si alloy via pulsed selective laser melting. JOM 67(3):590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vora P, Mumtaz K, Todd I, Hopkinson N (2015) AlSi12 in-situ alloy formation and residual stress reduction using anchorless selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 7:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang X, Zhang L, Fang M, Sercombe TB (2014) The effect of atmosphere on the structure and properties of a selective laser melted Al–12Si alloy. Mat Sci and Engg: A 597:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ma P, Prashanth KG, Scudino S, Jia Y, Wang H, Zou C, Wei Z, Eckert J (2014) Influence of annealing on mechanical properties of Al-20Si processed by selective laser melting. Metals 4(1):28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siddique S, Imran M, Wycisk E, Emmelmann C, Walther F (2015) Influence of process-induced microstructure and imperfections on mechanical properties of AlSi12 processed by selective laser melting. J Mat Processing Tech 221:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siddique S, Imran M, Walther F (2017) Very high cycle fatigue and fatigue crack propagation behavior of selective laser melted AlSi12 alloy. Int J Fatigue 94:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prashanth K, Scudino S, Klauss H, Surreddi KB, Löber L, Wang Z, Chaubey A, Kühn U, Eckert J (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–12Si produced by selective laser melting: effect of heat treatment. Mat Sci Engg: A 590:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li X, Wang X, Saunders M, Suvorova A, Zhang L, Liu Y, Fang M, Huang Z, Sercombe TB (2015) A selective laser melting and solution heat treatment refined Al–12Si alloy with a controllable ultrafine eutectic microstructure and 25% tensile ductility. Acta Mater 95:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Song B, Nishida E, Sanborn B, Maguire M, Adams D, Carroll J, Wise J, Reedlunn B, Bishop J, Palmer T (2017) Compressive and tensile stress–strain responses of additively manufactured (AM) 304L stainless steel at high strain rates. J Dynamic Behav Mater 3(3):412–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riza SH, Masood S, Wen C, Ruan D, Xu S (2014) Dynamic behaviour of high strength steel parts developed through laser assisted direct metal deposition. Mater Des 64:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mohammadhosseini A, Masood S, Fraser D, Jahedi M (2015) Dynamic compressive behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy processed by electron beam melting under high strain rate loading. Adv Manuf 3(3):232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramezani M, Flores-Johnson E, Shen LM, Neitzert T (2017) High strain rate compressive behaviour of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. In: Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publ, pp 323–326Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Winzer R, Glinicka A (2011) The static and dynamic compressive behaviour of selected aluminium alloys. Eng Trans 59(2):85–100Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luong DD, Shunmugasamy VC, Gupta N, Lehmhus D, Weise J, Baumeister J (2015) Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive response of iron and Invar matrix syntactic foams. Materials & Design 66:516–531Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee W-S, Liu C-Y (2006) The effects of temperature and strain rate on the dynamic flow behaviour of different steels. Mat Sci Engg: A 426(1):101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fan X, Suo T, Sun Q, Wang T (2013) Dynamic mechanical behavior of 6061 al alloy at elevated temperatures and different strain rates. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 26(2):111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang X-M, H-j LI, Li H-z, Hui G, Z-g GAO, Ying L, Bo L (2008) Dynamic property evaluation of aluminum alloy 2519A by split Hopkinson pressure bar. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 18(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh NK, Singha MK, Cadoni E, Gupta NK (2012) Strain rate sensitivity of an aluminium alloy under compressive loads. In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ, pp 169–173Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khan AS, Liu H (2012) Variable strain rate sensitivity in an aluminum alloy: response and constitutive modeling. Int J Plast 36:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gu H, Gong H, Pal D, Rafi K, Starr T, Stucker B (2013) Influences of energy density on porosity and microstructure of selective laser melted 17-4PH stainless steel. In: Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp 474–479Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suryawanshi J, Prashanth K, Scudino S, Eckert J, Prakash O, Ramamurty U (2016) Simultaneous enhancements of strength and toughness in an Al-12Si alloy synthesized using selective laser melting. Acta Mater 115:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Prashanth KG, Scudino S, Chaubey AK, Löber L, Wang P, Attar H, Schimansky FP, Pyczak F, Eckert J (2016) Processing of Al–12Si–TNM composites by selective laser melting and evaluation of compressive and wear properties. J Mater Res 31(01):55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aboulkhair NT, Stephens A, Maskery I, Tuck C, Ashcroft I, Everitt NM (2015) Mechanical properties of selective laser melted AlSi10Mg: nano, micro, and macro properties. In: Proc. of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. pp 1–30Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roberts CE, Bourell D, Watt T, Cohen J (2016) A novel processing approach for additive manufacturing of commercial aluminum alloys. Phys Procedia 83:909–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rosenthal I, Nahmany M, Stern A, Frage N (2015) Structure and mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg fabricated by selective laser melting additive manufacturing (SLM-AM). In: Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ, pp 62–66Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kang N, Coddet P, Liao H, Baur T, Coddet C (2016) Wear behavior and microstructure of hypereutectic Al-Si alloys prepared by selective laser melting. Appl Surf Sci 378:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kang N, Coddet P, Dembinski L, Liao H, Coddet C (2017) Microstructure and strength analysis of eutectic Al-Si alloy in-situ manufactured using selective laser melting from elemental powder mixture. J Alloys Compd 691:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gu D, Hagedorn Y-C, Meiners W, Meng G, Batista RJS, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R (2012) Densification behavior, microstructure evolution, and wear performance of selective laser melting processed commercially pure titanium. Acta Mater 60(9):3849–3860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schwab H, Palm F, Kühn U, Eckert J (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of the near-beta titanium alloy Ti-5553 processed by selective laser melting. Mater Des 105:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aboulkhair NT, Maskery I, Tuck C, Ashcroft I, Everitt NM (2016) The microstructure and mechanical properties of selectively laser melted AlSi10Mg: the effect of a conventional T6-like heat treatment. Mat Sci and Engg: A 667:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Ponnusamy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. H. Masood
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Ruan
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Palanisamy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rizwan Rashid
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Engineering and TechnologySwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Defence Materials Technology CentreMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations