Advertisement

Evaluation of mechanical properties of Mg-Al layered double hydroxide as a filler in epoxy-based FML composites

  • K. Logesh
  • V. K. Bupesh RajaEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Superior mechanical and formability properties are essential for applications in aviation, road vehicles, rail coaches and shipbuilding industry. Continuous efforts are carried on to identify suitable materials that satisfy the demanding properties for the above applications. Fiber metal laminates (FMLs) with E-glass reinforcements find its applications in the above fields. To improve the mechanical and formability characteristics of FMLs, various percentages of Mg-Al layered double hydroxides (LDHs) are added and the resultant laminates are studied through tensile test, formability parameters, flexural test, lap shear test, impact test, hardness test, Erichsen cupping test etc. Scanning electron microscopy was used to find the fracture behavior of the FMLs. The nano LDH is added to the epoxy resin matrix by means of dispersion process using ethanol. Strength determination test and characterization have been conducted to find the properties of nano LDH particle-reinforced FMLs. The results exhibit the superiority of LDH-added FMLs over plain FMLs without LDHs, making the LDH-added FMLs a suitable candidate for the above applications.

Keywords

FMLs Magnesium-aluminum (Mg-Al) LDH Nano LDH Mechanical properties Formability characteristics Fracture behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Centre for Nano Science and Nano Technology, Sathyabama University, Chennai, India, for providing the facilities to carry out the fabrication and testing of the nano LDH FML composites.

Supplementary material

170_2018_1692_MOESM1_ESM.docx (277 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 277 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kim KJ, Kim D, Choi SH, Chung K, Shin KS, Barlat F, Oh KH, Youn JR (2003) Formability of AA5182/polypropylene/AA5182 sandwich sheets. J Mater Process Technol 139:1–7Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Vries TJ, Vlot A (2001) The influence of the constituent properties on the residual strength of Glare. Appl Compos Mater 8:263–277Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sinmazçelik T, Avcu E, Bora MÖ, Çoban O (2011) A review: fibre metal laminates, background, bonding types and applied test methods. Mater Des 32:3671–3685Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lefebvre DR, Ahn BK, Dillard DA, Dillard JG (2002) The effect of surface treatments on interfacial fatigue crack initiation in aluminum/epoxy bonds. Int J Fract 114:191–202Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palanikumar K, Karunamoorthy L, Karthikeyan R (2006) Assessment of factors influencing surface roughness on the machining of glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Mater Des 27:862–871Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becker CM, Gabbardo AD, Wypych F, Amico SC (2011) Mechanical and flame-retardant properties of epoxy/Mg–Al LDH composites. Compos Part A 42:196–202Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsai T-Y, Shau-Wen L, Li F-S (2008) Preparation and characterization of epoxy/layered double hydroxides nanocomposites. J Phys Chem Solids 69:1386–1390Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Budhysutanto WN, Van Den Bruele FJ, Rossenaar BD, Van Agterveld D, Van Enckevort WJP, Kramer HJM (2011) A unique growth mechanism of donut-shaped Mg–Al layered double hydroxides crystals revealed by AFM and STEM–EDX. J Cryst Growth 318:110–116Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reyes GV, Cantwell WJ (2000) The mechanical properties of fibre-metal laminates based on glass fibre reinforced polypropylene. Compos Sci Technol 60:1085–1094Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tian S, Zhou Z (2016) New criteria for simulating failure under multiple impacts of the same total energy on glass fiber reinforced aluminum alloy laminates. Mater Des 102:142–150Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sokolova OA, Kuhn M, Palkowski H (2012) Deep drawing properties of lightweight steel/polymer/steel sandwich composites. Arch Civ Mech Eng 12:105–112Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    da Costa AA, da Silva DFNR, Travessa DN, Botelho EC (2012) The effect of thermal cycles on the mechanical properties of fiber–metal laminates. Mater Des 42:434–440Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mosse L, Compston P, Cantwell WJ, Cardew-Hall M, Kalyanasundaram S (2006) Stamp forming of polypropylene based fibre–metal laminates: the effect of process variables on formability. J Mater Process Technol 172:163–168Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sexton A, Cantwell W, Kalyanasundaram S (2012) Stretch forming studies on a fibre metal laminate based on a self-reinforcing polypropylene composite. Compos Struct 94:431–437Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abdullah MR, Cantwell WJ (2006) The impact resistance of polypropylene-based fibre–metal laminates. Compos Sci Technol 66:1682–1693Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cortes P, Cantwell WJ (2006) The fracture properties of a fibre–metal laminate based on magnesium alloy. Compos Part B 37:163–170Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gresham J, Cantwell W, Cardew-Hall MJ, Compston P, Kalyanasundaram S (2006) Drawing behaviour of metal–composite sandwich structures. Compos Struct 75:305–312Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khalili SMR, Mittal RK, Gharibi Kalibar S (2005) A study of the mechanical properties of steel/aluminium/GRP laminates. Mater Sci Eng A 412:137–140Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Caprino G, Spataro G, Del Luongo S (2004) Low-velocity impact behaviour of fibreglass–aluminium laminates. Compos Part A 35:605–616Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrucci R, Santulli C, Puglia D, Sarasini F, Torre L, Kenny JM (2013) Mechanical characterisation of hybrid composite laminates based on basalt fibres in combination with flax, hemp and glass fibres manufactured by vacuum infusion. Mater Des 49:728–735Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wangqing W, Abliz D, Jiang B, Ziegmann G, Meiners D (2014) A novel process for cost effective manufacturing of fiber metal laminate with textile reinforced pCBT composites and aluminum alloy. Compos Struct 108:172–180Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cui Z, Qu B-j (2010) Synergistic effects of layered double hydroxide with phosphorus-nitrogen intumescent flame retardant in PP/EPDM/IFR/LDH nanocomposites. Chin J Polym Sci 28(4):563−571Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Costa FR, Wagenknecht U, Heinrich G (2007) LDPE/Mg-Al layered double hydroxide nanocomposite: thermal and flammability properties. Polym Degrad Stab 92:1813–1823Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Logesh K, Bupesh Raja VK, Sasidhar P (2015) An experiment about morphological structure of Mg-Al layered double hydroxide using field emission scanning electron microscopy with EDAX analysis. Int J Chem Tech Res 8(3):1104–1108Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Becker CM, Dick TA, Wypych F, Schrekker HS, Amico SC (2012) Synergetic effect of LDH and glass fiber on the properties of two- and three-component epoxy composites. Polym Test 31:741–747Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shi Y, Chen F, Yang J, Zhong M (2010) Crystallinity and thermal stability of LDH/polypropylene nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 50:87–91Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alderliesten RC (2015) Designing for damage tolerance in aerospace: a hybrid material technology. Mater Des 66:421–428Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Costa FR, Leuteritz A, Wagenknecht U, der Landwehr MA, Jehnichen D, Haeussler L, Heinrich G (2009) Alkyl sulfonate modified LDH: effect of alkyl chain length on intercalation behavior, particle morphology and thermal stability. Appl Clay Sci 44:7–14Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leng J, Purohit PJ, Kang N, Wang D-Y, Falkenhagen J, Emmerling F, Thünemann AF, Schönhals A (2015) Structure–property relationships of nanocomposites based on polylactide and MgAl layered double hydroxides. Eur Polym J 68:338–354Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Palanikumar K (2007) Modeling and analysis for surface roughness in machining glass fibre reinforced plastics using response surface methodology. Mater Des 28:2611–2618Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chubar N (2011) New inorganic (an)ion exchangers based on Mg–Al hydrous oxides: (alkoxide-free) sol–gel synthesis and characterization. J Colloid Interface Sci 357:198–209Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lennerová D, Kovanda F, Brožek J (2015) Preparation of Mg–Al layered double hydroxide/polyamide 6 nanocomposites using Mg–Al–taurate LDH as nanofiller. Appl Clay Sci 114:265–272Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lv S, Yuan Y, Shi W (2009) Strengthening and toughening effects of layered double hydroxide and hyperbranched polymer on epoxy resin. Prog Org Coat 65:425–430Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Logesh K, Bupesh Raja VK, Velu R (2015) Experimental investigation for characterization of formability of epoxy based fiber metal laminates using Erichsen cupping test method. Indian J Sci Technol 8(33). doi:  https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i33/72244
  35. 35.
    Jian-guang LIU, Wei XUE (2013) Formability of AA5052/polyethylene/AA5052 sandwich sheets. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23:964–969Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chira A, Kumar A, Vlach T, Laiblová L, Škapin AS, Hájek P (2016) Property improvements of alkali resistant glass fibres/epoxy composite with nanosilica for textile reinforced concrete applications. Mater Des 89:146–155Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bouraada M, Belhalfaoui F, Ouali MS, de Menorval L-C (2009) Sorption study of an acid dye from an aqueous solution on modified Mg–Al layered double hydroxides. J Hazard Mater 163:463–467Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Laskowska A, Zaborski M, Boiteux G, Gain O, Marzec A, Maniukiewicz W (2014) Effects of unmodified layered double hydroxides MgAl-LDHs with various structures on the properties of filled carboxylated acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber XNBR. Eur Polym J 60:172–185Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang L, Lin Y, Xu S, Li R, Zheng X, Zhang F (2010) Intercalation of perfluorobutane sulfonate into layered double hydroxides. Appl Clay Sci 48:641–645Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carrillo JG, Cantwell WJ (2009) Mechanical properties of a novel fiber–metal laminate based on a polypropylene composite. Mech Mater 41:828–838Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reyes G, Kang H (2007) Mechanical behavior of lightweight thermoplastic fiber–metal laminates. J Mater Process Technol 186:284–290Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ozturk F, Esener E, Toros S, Picu CR (2010) Effects of aging parameters on formability of 6061-O alloy. Mater Des 31:4847–4852Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Song JH (2016) Tensile and bending behavior for woven carbon-aramid/epoxy hybrid composites with various lamination structures by the VARTM method. Fibers Polym 17(8):1269–1276Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vijaya Ramnath B, Junaid Kokan S, Niranjan Raja R, Sathyanarayanan R, Elanchezhian C, Rajendra Prasad A, Manickavasagam VM (2013) Evaluation of mechanical properties of abaca–jute–glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Mater Des 51:357–366Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li H, Chen J, Yang J (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of laminated steel sheet in V-bending process considering nonlinear visco-elasticity of polymer layer. J Mater Process Technol 212:36–45Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    McCombe GP, Etches JA, Mellor PH, Bond IP (2011) Development of a ferromagnetic fibre metal laminate. Compos Part A 42:1380–1389Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vijaya Ramnath B, Manickavasagam VM, Elanchezhian C, Vinodh Krishna C, Karthik S, Saravanan K (2014) Determination of mechanical properties of intra-layer abaca–jute–glass fiber reinforced composite. Mater Des 60:643–652Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mylsamy K, Rajendran I (2011) The mechanical properties, deformation and thermomechanical properties of alkali treated and untreated Agave continuous fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Des 32:3076–3084Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shin KS, Kim KJ, Choi S-W, Rhee MH (1999) Mechanical properties of aluminum/polypropylene/aluminum sandwich sheets. Met Mater 5(6):613–618Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Masoumi M, Emadoddin E (2013) Interface characterization and formability of two and three-layer composite sheets manufactured by roll bonding. Mater Des 44:392–396Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Logesh K, Bupesh Raja VK (2015) Formability analysis for enhancing forming parameters in AA8011/PP/AA1100 sandwich materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7832-5, ISSN 0268–3768, 81Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cepeda-Jimenez CM, Alderliesten RC, Ruano OA, Carrerio F (2009) Damage tolerance assessment by bend and shear tests of two multilayer composites: glass fiber reinforced metal laminate and aluminium roll-bonded laminate. Compos Sci Technol 69:343–348Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cepeda-Jimenez CM, Pozulelo M, Runao OA, Carreno F (2008) Influence of the thermomechanical processing on the fracture mechanisms of high strength aluminum/pure aluminum multilayer laminate materials. Mater Sci Eng A 490:319–327Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Singh RP, Parameswaran V (2003) An experimental investigation of dynamic crack propagation in a brittle material reinforced with a ductile layer. Opt Laser Eng 40:289–306Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Automobile EngineeringSathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations