Advertisement

Optimisation of a sustainable manufacturing system design using the multi-objective approach

  • Reda NujoomEmail author
  • Qian Wang
  • Ahmed Mohammed
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

A sustainable manufacturing system design can be defined as a process aimed at minimising the negative aspect of both economic and ecological costs. This may be partially achieved through the implementation of lean manufacturing methods in order to reduce production wastes, increase efficiency of manufacturing systems and minimise operational costs. Nevertheless, the concept of lean methods does not include environmental considerations in terms of such as energy consumption and CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions, which are also important factors today for developing a sustainable manufacturing system. This paper addresses these issues involved in modelling a sustainable manufacturing system allowing an evaluation in energy consumption and CO2 emissions against the total cost using the multi-objective approach. In this work, a multi-objective mathematical model was developed based on a manufacturing system incorporating its economic and ecological parameters towards a minimisation of the total cost, the total energy consumption and CO2 emissions associated with relevant machines, air-conditioning units and lighting bulbs involved in each manufacturing process and material flow. The model was coded using LINGO11 to help gain optimal solutions using the ε-constraint approach and the LP-metrics approach, respectively. The best solution among obtained optimal results was revealed using the max-min approach. Applicability of the proposed method was also examined using collected data from a real case study. The study concluded that the multi-objective mathematical model was useful as an aid for optimizing the manufacturing system design under the economic and ecological constraints.

Keywords

Sustainable manufacturing systems Energy consumption CO2 Lean manufacturing Environmental constraints Multi-objectives 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for the financial support in this study. Also, the authors would like to thank the anonymous referees whose thorough reviews and insightful comments made a valuable contribution to this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Lind S, Krassi B, Johansson B, Viitaniemi J, Heilala J, Stahre J, …, & Berlin C (2008) SIMTER: a production simulation tool for joint assessment of ergonomics, level of automation and environmental impacts. In The 18th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent ManufacturingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taghdisian H, Pishvaie MR, Farhadi F (2015) Multi-objective optimization approach for green design of methanol plant based on CO 2-efficeincy indicator. J Clean Prod 103:640–650.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Q, Lassalle S, Mileham AR, Owen GW (2009) Analysis of a linear walking worker line using a combination of computer simulation and mathematical modeling approaches. J Manuf Syst 28(2–3):64–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2009.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heilala J, Vatanen S, Tonteri H, Montonen J, Lind S, Johansson B, Stahre J (2008) Simulation-based sustainable manufacturing system design, Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. pp 1922-1930Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nujoom R, Wang Q, Bennett N (2016a) An integrated method for sustainable manufacturing systems design, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferences in MATEC, vol. 70, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 1-5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pagell M, Yang CL, Krumwiede DW, Sheu C (2004) Does the competitive environment influence the efficacy of investment in environmental management? J Supply Chain Manag 40(3):30–39.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2004.tb00172.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodger JA, George JA (2017) Triple bottom line accounting for optimizing natural gas sustainability: a statistical linear programming fuzzy ILOWA optimized sustainment model approach to reducing supply chain global cybersecurity vulnerability through information and communications technology. J Clean Prod 142:1931–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Dillon JrOW, Jawahir IS (2010) Sustainable manufacturing modeling and optimization challenges at the product, pro-cess and system levels. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2(3):144–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nishant R, Teo TSH, Goh M (2014) Energy efficiency benefits: is technophilic optimizm justified? IEEE Trans Eng Manag 61(3):476–487.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2014.2314703 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jawahir IS, Jayal AD (2011) Product and process innovation for modeling of sustainable machining processes. In: Seliger G, Khraisheh MMK, Jawahir IS (eds) Adv. Sustain. Manuf. Springer, Berlin, pp 301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J (2010) Transitioning to sustainable production—part I: application on machining technologies. J Clean Prod 18(2):174–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pishvaee MS, Razmi J (2012) Environmental supply chain network design using multi-objective fuzzy mathematical programming. Appl Math Model 36(8):3433–3446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.10.007 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gielen D, Moriguchi Y (2002) CO2 in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy 30:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hidalgo I, Szabo L, Ciscar C, Soria A (2005) Technological prospects and CO2 emission trading analyses in the iron and steel industry, a global model. Energy 30(5):583–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koç E, Kaplan E (2007) An investigation on energy consumption in yarn production with special reference to ring spinning. J Fibr Texti Eas Eur 4:18–24Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang C, Larsson M, Ryman C, Grip CE, Wikström JO, Johnsson A, Engdahl J (2008) A model on CO2 emission reduction in integrated steelmaking by optimization methods. Int J Energy Res 32(12):1092–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li C, Zhang X, Zhang S, Suzuki K (2009) Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products, multi-optimization method. Chem Eng Res Des 87(2):233–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2008.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohammed A, Wang Q, Alyahya S, Bennett N (2016) Design and optimization of an RFID-enabled automated warehousing system under uncertainties: a multi-criterion fuzzy programming approach. Int J Adv Manuf TechnolGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jamshidi R, Ghomi SF, Karimi B (2012) Multi-objective green supply chain optimization with a new hybrid memetic algorithm using the Taguchi method. Scientia Iranica 19(6):1876–1886.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alçada-Almeida L, Coutinho-Rodrigues J, Current J (2009) A multi-objective modeling approach to locating incinerators. Socio Econ Plan Sci 43(2):111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2008.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang F, Lai X, Shi N (2011) A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design. Decis Support Syst 51(2):262–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abdallah T, Diabat A, Simchi-Levi D (2010) A carbon sensitive supply chain network problem with green procurement, Proceedings of the 40th International Conference In Computers And Industrial Engineering (CIE), 1–6. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 39(9):8182–8192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou CC, Yin GF, Hu XB (2009) Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Mater Des 30(4):1209–1215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamdy M, Hasan A, Siren K (2011) Applying a multi-objective optimization approach for design of low-emission cost-effective dwellings. Build Environ 46(1):109–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pinto-Varela T, Barbosa-Póvoa APF, Novais AQ (2011) Bi-objective optimization approach to the design and planning of supply chains: economic versus environmental performances. Comput Chem Eng 35(8):1454–1468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fesanghary M, Asadi S, Geem ZW (2012) Design of low-emission and energy-efficient residential buildings using a multi-objective optimization algorithm. Build Environ 49:245–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharafi M, ELMekkawy TY (2014) Multi-objective optimal design of hybrid renewable energy systems using PSO-simulation based approach. Renew Energy 68:67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sahar V, Arijit B, Byrne PJ (2014) A case analysis of a sustainable food supply chain distribution system—a multi-objective approach. Int J Prod Econ 152:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bortolini M, Faccio M, Ferrari M, Gamberi M, Pilati F (2016) Fresh food sustainable distribution: cost, delivery time and carbon footprint three-objective optimization. J Food Eng 174:56–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paksoy T, Pehlivan NY, Özceylan E (2012) Fuzzy multi objective optimization of green supply chain network with risk management of included environmental hazards. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18(5):1121–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harris I, Mumford CL, Naim MM (2014) A hybrid multi-objective approach to capacitated facility location with flexible store allocation for green logistics modeling. Transport Res E Log 66:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    EPA (2008) The lean and environment toolkit. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.epa.gov/lean/toolkit/index.htm. Accessed June 26
  34. 34.
    Nujoom R, Mohammed A, Wang Q, Bennett N (2016b) The multi-objective optimization model for a sustainable manufacturing system design. In Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), 2016 I.E. international conference on 1134-1140Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nurjanni KP, Carvalho MS, da Costa LAAF (2014) Green supply chain design with multi-objective optimization, Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bali, Indonesia, pp 7–9Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Amin SH, Zhang G (2013) A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl Math Model 37(6):416MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mohammed A, Wang Q (2016) The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply chain. Int J Prod EconGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lai YL, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy mathematical programming, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48753-8 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang Q, Chatwin CR (2005) Key issues and developments in modelling and simulation-based methodologies for manufacturing systems analysis, design and performance evaluation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(11–12):1254–1265.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1957-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  2. 2.Business SchoolCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations