Advertisement

Comprehensive characterization and material modeling for ceramic injection molding simulation performance validations

  • Guido ToselloEmail author
  • David Maximilian Marhöfer
  • Aminul Islam
  • Tobias Müller
  • Klaus Plewa
  • Volker Piotter
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Powder injection molding is like the process of plastics injection molding capable of the mass production of highly functional complex 3D parts, just in ceramics and metals. The market for products made by powder injection molding is constantly growing. With this growth, the need for reliable process simulations arises. Simulation tools are widely used in the development of new products and are applied in powder and polymer injection molding to support the product design, shorten the development time, avoid errors, and help to optimize the mold and process design. However, material data for feedstocks and thus simulations of the powder injection molding process are hardly available yet. The present work introduces the necessary material data for establishing a material model for simulations. An extensive material characterization of ceramic feedstocks was conducted. The material investigations comprised the determination of basic, thermal, and rheological material properties to collect a comprehensive data set. The necessary measurements and tools are outlined and their results are discussed in detail with regard to powder content and in comparison to pure plastics. The gained data enabled to successfully create a material model for mold filling simulations. Powder injection molding experiments were carried out with a spiral test geometry. The mold was equipped with a sensor array for the process monitoring during injection. Furthermore, a simulation model of the test geometry was established. Finally, the results of the experiments and simulations are discussed and are compared to validate the performance of the simulations. The results showed the potential and limitations of process simulations and standard software applied in conventional and micro powder injection molding.

Keywords

Powder injection molding Simulations Feedstocks Material characterization Rheology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper reports work undertaken in a collaboration between the Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, and the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. The financial and personnel aid of both facilities is greatly acknowledged. Furthermore, the work and collaboration was supported by the Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facilities (KNMF, www.knmf.kit.edu), the Helmholtz Research Infrastructure at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (proposal ID: 2014-012-004392) which is also gratefully acknowledged and which made this research possible.

References

  1. 1.
    Heaney DF (2012) Handbook of metal injection molding. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang J (2012) Some critical issues for injection molding. InTech, RijekaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Attia UM, Alcock JR (2011) A review of micro-powder injection moulding as a microfabrication technique. J Micromech Microeng 21(4):043001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Attia UM, Alcock JR (2012) Fabrication of ceramic micro-scale hollow components by micro-powder injection moulding. J Eur Ceram Soc 32(6):1199–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piotter V (2011) A review of the current status of MicroPIM. Powder Inj Mold Int 5(3):27–42Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Löhe D, Haußelt J (2005) Microengineering of metals and ceramics. Part I: design, tooling and injection molding. Wiley-VCH Verlag, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urval R, Lee S, Atre SV, Park SJ, German RM (2008) Optimisation of process conditions in powder injection moulding of microsystem components using a robust design method: part I. Primary design parameters. Powder Metall 51(2):133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thornagel M (2012) Injection moulding simulation: new developments offer rewards for the PIM industry. Powder Inj Mold Int 6(1):65–68Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    SIGMA Engineering (2013) 3D moulding simulation—the ‘whole process’ approach. Met Powder Rep 68(3):30–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Costa FS, Tosello G, Whiteside BR (2009) Best practice strategies for validation of micro moulding process simulation. Proceedings of the Polymer Process Engineering 2009 Conference, University of Bradford, pp 331–364Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vietri U, Sorrentino A, Speranza V, Pantani R (2011) Improving the predictions of injection molding simulation software. Polym Eng Sci 51(12):2542–2551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khalilian SA, Park SS, Freiheit TI (2013) The application of commercial injection molding software to micro-component design and process development. Proceedings of the 8th Internation Conference on Micro Manufacturing (ICOMM 2013), pp 50–56Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marhöfer DM, Tosello G, Hansen HN, Islam A (2013) Advancements on the simulation of the micro injection moulding process. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture (4M), Research Publishing Services, San Sebastian, Spain, pp 77–81Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tosello G, Gava A, Hansen HN, Reinecke H, Lucchetta G, Schoth A (2009) Experimental validation of micro molding simulations using different process setting conditions. Proceedings of the 67th Annual Technical Conference of the Society of Plastics Engineers 2009 (ANTEC 2009), Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE), Chigago, IL, USA, pp 1787–1793Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen-Chung T, Loser C, Jüttner G, Pham T, Obadal M, Gehde M (2011) Simulation of the micro-injection moulding process: effect of the thermo-rheological status on the morphology. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng 225(4):224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen L, Kietzmann C, Astbury D, Shao L (2014) Advanced cooling simulation technologies for the injection molding process, p 8Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Islam A, Giannekas N, Marhöfer DM, Tosello G, Hansen HN (2016) Experimental investigation of comparative process capabilities of metal and ceramic injection moulding for precision applications. J Micro Nano-Manuf 4(September):031003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drummer D, Messingschlager S (2014) Ceramic injection molding material analysis, modeling and injection molding simulation. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference of the Polymer Processing Society (PPS-29), AIP Publishing, pp 582–586Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yunn HS, Muhamad N, Sulong AB (2011) Micro powder injection molding (μPIM): review. Appl Mech Mater 52-54:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kennedy P, Zheng R (2013) Flow analysis of injection molds. Carl Hanser Verlag, MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Osswald TA, Rudolph N (2014) Polymer rheology. Carl Hanser Verlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schramm G (1994) A practical approach to rheology and rheometry. Gebrueder HAAKE, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reher E-O (2000) Zur Rheologie von Polymerschmelzen. Sitzungsberichte der Leibniz-Sozietät 43:5–23Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dealy JM, Wang J (2013) Melt rheology and its applications in the plastics industry. Springer Science+Business Media, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Göttfert A, Reher E-O, Balagula IM (2000) Kapillarrheometer für die Kunststoffverarbeitung. Simulation rheologischer Prozesse. KGK Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe 53(9):512–517Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Autodesk (2015) Autodesk Simulation Moldflow Insight®Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kowalski L, Duszczyk J (1999) Specific heat of metal powder-polymer feedstock for powder injection molding. J Mater Sci Lett 18:1417–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kate KH, Onbattuvelli VP, Enneti RK, Lee SW, Park SJ, Atre SV (2012) Measurements of powder–polymer mixture properties and their use in powder injection molding simulations for aluminum nitride. JOM 64(9):1048–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martin R, Vick M, Kelly M, de Souza JP, Enneti RK, Atre SV (2013) Powder injection molding of a mullite–zirconia composite. J Mater Res Technol 2(3):263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lenz J, Enneti RK, Onbattuvelli VP, Kate KH, Martin R, Atre SV (2012) Powder injection molding of ceramic engine components for transportation. JOM 64(3):388–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kate KH, Enneti RK, Onbattuvelli VP, Atre SV (2013) Feedstock properties and injection molding simulations of bimodal mixtures of nanoscale and microscale aluminum nitride. Ceram Int 39(6):6887–6897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    International Organization for Standardization (2008) ISO 22007-2:2008—plastics—determination of thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity—part 2: transient plane heat source (hot disc) methodGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Netzsch-Gerätebau (2013) Laser flash analysis—LFA (LFA427)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lobo H, Cohen C (1990) Measurement of thermal conductivity of polymer melts by the line-source method. Polym Eng Sci 30(2):65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roos E, Maile K (2008) Werkstoffkunde für Ingenieure – Grundlagen, Anwendung, Prüfung. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    BASF SE (2008) Catamold® TZP-A—data sheet, processing instructions, product specificationGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wolfmeier U, Schmidt H, Heinrichs F-L, Michalczyk G, Payer W, Dietsche W, Boehlke K, Hohner G, Wildgruber J (2012) “Waxes,” Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, pp 111–172Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    AMETEK Specialty Metal Products. 17-4 PH: the workhorse of precipitation-hardening stainless steelsGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maxon Motor (2010) Innovative CIM / MIM Komponenten, p 5Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Deutsche Edelstahlwerke (2015) Acidur 4542 – Werkstoffdatenblatt X5CrNiCuNb16-4 1.4542, p 6Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lü L, Fuh JYH, Wong Y-S (2013) Laser-induced materials and processes for rapid prototyping. Springer Science+Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Tosello
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Maximilian Marhöfer
    • 2
  • Aminul Islam
    • 1
  • Tobias Müller
    • 3
  • Klaus Plewa
    • 4
  • Volker Piotter
    • 4
  1. 1.Department for Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.School of Engineering, Institute of Polymer NanotechnologyUniversity of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland FHNWWindischSwitzerland
  3. 3.Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics (IAI)Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyEggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Applied Materials - Materials Process Technology (IAM-WK)Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyEggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations