The machining surface localization of free-form blade considering form tolerance
- 56 Downloads
Aerospace blade is the most important part for pneumatic performance with expensive material and cost. Precise NC machining after near-net forming is a trend for aerospace blade machining. If the billet cannot cover the machining surface, the localization is necessary before machining. Because of little machining allowance and various tolerance requirements, free-form surface localization of aerospace blade becomes a puzzle. Traditional free-form surface localization researches focused on finding an appropriate position for design surface to guarantee the enough machining allowance. Different from traditional free-form surface localization research, the form tolerance is considered in the localization optimization. The localization result needs to satisfy the machining allowance and tolerance requirements. To achieve this target, the characteristics of blade modeling and inspection are analyzed. And then, a tolerance constraint is introduced into localization to ensure that the machining surface could satisfy the tolerance requirements. The traditional localization method and the new method considering design tolerance are applied on a compressor blade localization, respectively. From a comparison, the necessity of form tolerance constraint is verified.
KeywordsFree-form blade Localization Form tolerance Machining allowance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
- 1.Li XM, Yeung M, Li ZX (1996) An algebraic algorithm for workpiece localization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 152–158Google Scholar
- 2.Yi X, Ma LM, Li ZX (2008) A geometric algorithm for symmetric workpiece localization.. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Intell Control Autom, pp 6065–6069Google Scholar
- 4.Chu YX, Gou, JB, Li ZX (1998) On the hybrid workpiece localization/envelopment problems. Proceedings of the 1998 I.E. International Conference on Robotics & Automation 4:3665–3670Google Scholar
- 8.Chatelain JF (2005) A level-based optimization algorithm for complex part localization. Precis Eng 29(2):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2004.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Sun YW, Xu JT, Guo DM, Jia ZY (2009) A unified localization approach for machining allowance optimization of complex curved surfaces. Precis Eng 33(4):516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Yan SJ, Zhou YF, Peng FY, Lai XD (2004) Research on the localization of the workpieces with large sculptured surfaces in NC machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(5–6):429–435Google Scholar
- 12.Sun YW, Wang XM, Guo DM (2009) Machining localization and quality evaluation of parts with sculptured surfaces using SQP method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(11–12):1131–1139Google Scholar
- 15.Han C, Zhang DH, Wu BH, Pu K, Luo M (2014) Localization of freeform surface workpiece with particle swarm optimization algorithm. 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing, pp 47–52Google Scholar
- 17.Wu BH, Wang J, Zhang Y, Luo M (2015) Adaptive location of repaired blade for multi-axis milling. J Comput Des Eng 2(4):261–267Google Scholar
- 20.Li WL, Yin ZP, Xiong YL (2009) Adaptive distance function and its application in free-form surface localization. Proceedings of the 2009 I.E. International Conference on Information and Automation, pp 24–28Google Scholar
- 24.Chu YX, Gou JB, Kang B, Woo KT, Li ZX (1997) Performance analysis of localization algorithms. Proceedings of the 1997 I.E. International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2:1247–1252Google Scholar
- 25.Chu YX, Gou JB, Wu H, Li ZX (1998) Localization algorithms: performance evaluation and reliability analysis. Proceedings of the 1998 I.E. International Conference on Robotics and Automation 4:3652–3657Google Scholar