Advertisement

Experimental investigation of machining characteristics and chatter stability for Hastelloy-X with ultrasonic and hot turning

  • Mehmet Alper SofuoğluEmail author
  • Fatih Hayati Çakır
  • Selim Gürgen
  • Sezan Orak
  • Melih Cemal Kuşhan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Ultrasonic-assisted machining is a machining operation based on the intermittent cutting of material which is obtained through vibrations generated by an ultrasonic system. This method utilizes low-amplitude vibrations with high frequency to prevent continuous contact between a cutting tool and a workpiece. Hot machining is another method for machining materials which are difficult to cut. The basic principle of this method is that the surface of the workpiece is heated to a specific temperature below the recrystallization temperature of the material. This heating operation can be applied before or during the machining process. Both of these operations improve machining operations in terms of workpiece-cutting tool characteristics. In this study, a novel hybrid machining method called hot ultrasonic-assisted turning (HUAT) is proposed for the machinability of Hastelloy-X material. This new technique combines ultrasonic-assisted turning (UAT) and hot turning methods to take advantage of both machining methods in terms of machining characteristics, such as surface roughness, stable cutting depths, and cutting tool temperature. In order to observe the effect of the HUAT method, Hastelloy-X alloy was selected as the workpiece. Experiments on conventional turning (CT), UAT, and HUAT operations were carried out for Hastelloy-X alloy, changing the cutting speed and cutting tool overhang lengths. Chip morphology was also observed. In addition, modal and sound tests were performed to investigate the modal and stability characteristics of the machining. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) method was performed to find the effect of the cutting speed, tool overhang length, and machining techniques (CT, UAT, HUAT) on surface roughness, stable cutting depths, and cutting tool temperature. The results show both ultrasonic vibration and heat improve the machining of Hastelloy-X. A decrease in surface roughness and an increase in stable cutting depths were observed, and higher cutting tool temperatures were obtained in UAT and HUAT compared to CT. According to the ANOVA results, tool overhang length, cutting speed, and machining techniques were effective parameters for surface roughness and stable cutting depths at a 1% significance level (p ≤ 0.01). In addition, cutting speed and machining techniques have an influence on cutting tool temperature at a 1% significance level (p ≤ 0.01). During chip analysis, serrated chips were observed in UAT and HUAT.

Keywords

Ultrasonic-assisted turning Hot machining Surface roughness Chatter stability Cutting tool temperature Hastelloy-X 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Funding Information

This work was financially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK Project #215M382) and the Research Fund of Eskişehir Osmangazi University (ESOGU BAP Project #2016-1086). The authors M.A. Sofuoğlu and S. Gürgen acknowledge the support of TÜBİTAK under programs 2228 and 2211.

References

  1. 1.
    Akıncıoğlu S, Gökkaya H, Uygur İ (2016) The effects of cryogenic-treated carbide tools on tool wear and surface roughness of turning of Hastelloy C22 based on Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1–4):303–314Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ulutan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):250–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choudhury I, El-Baradie M (1998) Machinability of nickel-base super alloys: a general review. J Mater Process Technol 77(1–3):278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altin A (2014) Optimization of the turning parameters for the cutting forces in the Hastelloy X superalloy based on the Taguchi method. Mater Tehnol 48(2):249–254Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kadirgama K, Abou-El-Hossein KA, Noor MM, Sharma KV, Mohammad B (2011) Tool life and wear mechanism when machining Hastelloy C-22HS. Wear 270(3–4):258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kadirgama K, Noor MM, Abou-El-Hossein KA, Mohammad B, Habeeb HH (2009) Aspects of wear mechanisms of carbide tools when machine Hastelloy C-22HS. Adv Mater Res 83–86:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kadirgama K, Rahman M, Mohamed B, Bakar R, Ismail A (2014) Development of temperature statistical model when machining of aerospace alloy materials. Therm Sci 18(suppl.1):269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kadirgama K, Abou-El-Hossein KA, Mohammad B, Habeeb H (2007) Statistical model to determine surface roughness when milling hastelloy C-22HS. J Mech Sci Technol 21(10):1651–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khidhir BA, Mohamed B (2010) Study of cutting speed on surface roughness and chip formation when machining nickel-based alloy. J Mech Sci Technol 24(5):1053–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khidhir BA, Mohamed B (2011) Analyzing the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness and tool wear when machining nickel based hastelloy – 276. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 17:12043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Razak NH, Rahman MM, Kadirgama K (2012) Response surface design model to predict surface roughness when machining Hastelloy C-2000 using uncoated carbide insert. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 36:12022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amini S and Teimouri R (2016) Parametric study and multicharacteristic optimization of rotary turning process assisted by longitudinal ultrasonic vibration, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408916651894
  13. 13.
    Babitsky V, Kalashnikov A, Meadows A, Wijesundara AAH (2003) Ultrasonically assisted turning of aviation materials. J Mater Process Technol 132(1–3):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Babitsky V, Mitrofanov A, Silberschmidt V (2004) Ultrasonically assisted turning of aviation materials: simulations and experimental study. Ultrasonics 42(1–9):81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jiao F, Niu Y, Liu X (2015) Effect of ultrasonic vibration on surface white layer in ultrasonic aided turning of hardened GCr15 bearing steel. Mater. Res. Innov 19(sup8):S8–938–S8–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2003) Finite element simulations of ultrasonically assisted turning. Comput Mater Sci 28(3–4):645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nath C, Rahman M (2008) Effect of machining parameters in ultrasonic vibration cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(9):965–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zou P, Xu Y, He Y, Chen M, Wu H (2015) Experimental investigation of ultrasonic vibration assisted turning of 304 austenitic stainless steel. Shock Vib 2015:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patil S, Joshi S, Tewari A, Joshi SS (2014) Modelling and simulation of effect of ultrasonic vibrations on machining of Ti6Al4V. Ultrasonics 54(2):694–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharma VS, Dogra M, Suri NM (2008) Advances in the turning process for productivity improvement—a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 222(11):1417–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brehl DE, Dow TA (2008) Review of vibration-assisted machining. Precis Eng 32(3):153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farahnakian M, Razfar MR (2014) Experimental study on hybrid ultrasonic and plasma aided turning of hardened steel AISI 4140. Mater Manuf Process 29(5):550–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shamoto E, Suzuki N, Hino R (2008) Analysis of 3D elliptical vibration cutting with thin shear plane model. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shamoto E, Moriwaki T (1994) Study on elliptical vibration cutting. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 43(1):35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheung CF, Lee WB (2000) Modelling and simulation of surface topography in ultra-precision diamond turning. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 214(6):463–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim D-S, Chang I-C, Kim S-W (2002) Microscopic topographical analysis of tool vibration effects on diamond turned optical surfaces. Precis Eng 26(2):168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guo P, Ehmann KF (2013) An analysis of the surface generation mechanics of the elliptical vibration texturing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 64:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sajjady SA, Nouri Hossein Abadi H, Amini S, Nosouhi R (2016) Analytical and experimental study of topography of surface texture in ultrasonic vibration assisted turning. Mater Des 93:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang C, Ehmann K, Li Y (2015) Analysis of cutting forces in the ultrasonic elliptical vibrationassisted micro-groove turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(1–4):139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guo P, Ehmann KF (2013) Development of a tertiary motion generator for elliptical vibration texturing. Precis Eng 37(2):364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang C, Guo P, Ehmann KF, Li Y (2016) Effects of ultrasonic vibrations in micro-groove turning. Ultrasonics 67:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Amini S, Hosseinabadi HN, Sajjady SA (2016) Experimental study on effect of micro textured surfaces generated by ultrasonic vibration assisted face turning on friction and wear performance. Appl Surf Sci 390:633–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Silberschmidt VV, Mahdy SMA, Gouda MA, Naseer A, Maurotto A, Roy A (2014) Surface roughness improvement in ultrasonically assisted turning. Procedia CIRP 13:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang X, Senthil Kumar A, Rahman M, Nath C, Liu K (2012) An analytical force model for orthogonal elliptical vibration cutting technique. J Manuf Process 14(3):378–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang X, Kumar AS, Rahman M, Liu K (2013) Modeling of the effect of tool edge radius on surface generation in elliptical vibration cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1–4):35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu D, Cong WL, Pei ZJ, Tang Y (2012) A cutting force model for rotary ultrasonic machining of brittle materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Razavi H, Mirbagheri M (2016) Design and fabrication of a novel vibrational system for ultrasonic assisted oblique turning process. J Mech Sci Technol 30(2):827–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mitrofanov AV, Ahmed N, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2005) Effect of lubrication and cutting parameters on ultrasonically assisted turning of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Muhammad R, Hussain MS, Maurotto A, Siemers C, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Analysis of a free machining α+β titanium alloy using conventional and ultrasonically assisted turning. J Mater Process Technol 214(4):906–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Muhammad R, Ahmed N, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2012) Numerical modelling of vibration-assisted turning of Ti-15333. Procedia CIRP 1:347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bai W, Sun R, Leopold J (2016) Numerical modelling of microstructure evolution in Ti6Al4V alloy by ultrasonic assisted cutting. Procedia CIRP 46:428–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xing D, Zhang J, Shen X, Zhao Y, Wang T (2013) Tribological properties of ultrasonic vibration assisted milling aluminium alloy surfaces. Procedia CIRP 6:539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Razavi H, Nategh MJ, Abdullah A (2012) Analytical modeling and experimental investigation of ultrasonic-vibration assisted oblique turning, part III: Experimental investigation. Int J Mech Sci 63(1):26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ding K, Fu Y, Su H, Chen Y, Yu X, Ding G (2014) Experimental studies on drilling tool load and machining quality of C/SiC composites in rotary ultrasonic machining. J Mater Process Technol 214(12):2900–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nath C, Rahman M, Andrew SSK (2007) A study on ultrasonic vibration cutting of low alloy steel. J Mater Process Technol 192–193:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lu D, Wang Q, Wu Y, Cao J, Guo H (2015) Fundamental turning characteristics of Inconel 718 by applying ultrasonic elliptical vibration on the base plane. Mater Manuf Process 30(8):1010–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jamshidi H, Nategh MJ (2013) Theoretical and experimental investigation of the frictional behavior of the tool–chip interface in ultrasonic-vibration assisted turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 65:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Guo P and Ehmann KF (2011) Development of a new vibrator for elliptical vibration texturing. 373–380Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang Q, Wu Y, Gu J, Lu D, Ji Y, Nomura M (2016) Fundamental machining characteristics of the in-base-plane ultrasonic elliptical vibration assisted turning of Inconel 718. Procedia CIRP 42:858–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Maurotto A, Muhammad R, Roy A, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2012) Comparing machinability of Ti-15-3-3-3 and Ni-625 alloys in Uat. Procedia CIRP 1:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Maurotto A, Muhammad R, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2010) Recent developments in ultrasonically assisted machining of advanced alloys. In 4th CIRP conference onhigh performance cutting. GifuGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Maurotto A, Muhammad R, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2013) Enhanced ultrasonically assisted turning of a β-titanium alloy. Ultrasonics 53:1242–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Maurotto A, Roy A (2014) Surface-roughness improvement in ultrasonically assisted turning. Procedia CIRP 13:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Maurotto A, Roy A, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2012) Analysis of machinability of Ti- and Ni-based alloys. Solid State Phenom 188:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2004) Finite element analysis of ultrasonically assisted turning of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Babitsky VI, Kalashnikov AN, Molodtsov FV (2004) Autoresonant control of ultrasonically assisted cutting. Mechatronics 14:91–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ahmed N, Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2006) Analysis of material response to ultrasonic vibration loading in turning Inconel 718. Mater Sci Eng A 424:318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ahmed N, Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2007) Analysis of forces in ultrasonically assisted turning. J Sound Vib 308:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Özler L, İnan A, Özel C (2001) Theoretical and experimental determination of tool life in hot machining of austenitic manganese steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(2):163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sun S, Brandt M, Dargusch MS (2010) Thermally enhanced machining of hard-to-machine materials—a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(8):663–680, ISSN 0890–6955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rahim E, Warap N, Mohid Z (2015) Chapter 1: Thermal-assisted machining of nickel-based alloy, Materials Science » Metals and Nonmetals » Superalloys, ISBN 978-953-51-2212-8Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Madhavulu M, Ahmed B (1994) Hot machining process for improved metal removal rates in turning operation. J Mater Process Technol 44:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Leshock CE, Kim JN, Shin YC (2000) Plasma enhanced machining of Inconel 718: modeling of workpiece temperature with plasma and experimental results. Int J Mach Tool Manu 41:877–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mohid Z, Warap NM, Hassan S, Ismail MIS, Ibrahim R, Rahim EA (2014) Numerical analysis of laser heating for laser assisted micro milling application. Appl Mech Mater 465-466:720–724Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Norazlan MW, Mohid Z, Rahim EA (2013) Laser assisted machining of titanium alloys. Mater Sci Forum 763:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lei S, Pfefferkorn F (2007) A review on thermally assisted machining, ASME 2007 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference Atlanta, Georgia, pp 325–336Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vali A, Longuemard JP, Marot G, Litwin J (1999) Residual stress conditions in laser-assisted machining. Weld Int 13(4):296–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tosun N, Özler L (2002) A study of tool life in hot machining using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method. J Mater Process Technol 124(1–2):99–104, ISSN 0924–0136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00086-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Luo J, Ding H, Shih AJ (2005) Induction-heated tool machining of elastomers—part 2: chip morphology, cutting forces and machined surface. Mach Sci Technol: Int J 9:567–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kizaki T, Harada K, Mitsuishi M (2014) Efficient and precise cutting of zirconia ceramics using heated cutting tool. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Taniguchi N, Ikeda M, Miyamoto I, Miyazaki T (1989) Energy-beam processing of materials: advanced manufacturing using various energy sources. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wong BT, Mengüç P, Vallance RR (2004) Nano-scale machining via electron beam and laser processing. J Heat Transf 126(4):566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Amin AKMN, Abdelgadir M (2003) The effect of preheating of work material on chatter during end milling of medium carbon steel performed on a vertical machining center (VMC). J Manuf Sci E T ASME 125:674–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Muhammad R, Maurotto A, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2011) Analysis of forces in vibro-impact and hot vibro-impact turning of advanced alloys. Appl Mech Mater 70:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Muhammad R, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2013) Finite element modelling of conventional and hybrid oblique turning processes of titanium alloy. Procedia CIRP 8:510–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Muhammad R, Maurotto A, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2012) Hot ultrasonically assisted turning of β-Ti alloy. Procedia CIRP 1:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Davim JP (ed) (2010) Surface integrity in machining. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hessainia Z, Belbah A, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Rigal J-F (2013) On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations. Measurement 46(5):1671–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Tabatabaei SMK, Behbahani S, Mirian SM (2013) Analysis of ultrasonic assisted machining (UAM) on regenerative chatter in turning. J Mater Process Technol 213(3):418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Neşeli S (2013) Analitical investigation of effect of process damping on chatter vibrations and optimization cutting parameters depending on stable depth of cut and process damping values in turning, Doctoral Thesis, Selçuk University, KonyaGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Türkeş E (2007) Theoretical and experimental analysis of process damping in machine tool chatter vibration, Doctoral Thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, EskişehirGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Khajehzadeh M, Akhlaghi M, Razfar MR (2014) Finite element simulation and experimental investigation of tool temperature during ultrasonically assisted turning of aerospace aluminum using multicoated carbide inserts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:1163–1175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6163-2
  83. 83.
    Muhammad R (2013) Hot ultrasonically assisted turning of Ti-15V3Al3Cr3Sn: experimental and numerical analysis, Doctoral Thesis, Loughborough University, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Alper Sofuoğlu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fatih Hayati Çakır
    • 2
  • Selim Gürgen
    • 2
  • Sezan Orak
    • 1
  • Melih Cemal Kuşhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringEskişehir Osmangazi UniversityEskişehirTurkey
  2. 2.Vocational School of TransportationAnadolu UniversityEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations