Numerical investigations on the effect of pit on two-step dimple forming of atomic fuel spacer grid

  • Karuppasamy Pandian Marimuthu
  • Wanseop Choi
  • Naksoo Kim
  • Hyungyil Lee
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Surface defects, known as pits, due to intervention of impurities are difficult to control during the production of sheet metals for atomic fuel spacer grids. These surface defects can increase the fracture risk during sheet metal forming (SMF) processes and lead to failure due to cracking. In this research, an effect of pits on the formability of zircaloy-4 sheets in two-step stamping process is numerically investigated. Experimentally measured pits with averaged sizes are introduced into finite element (FE) models to investigate the effect pit size and the location on plastic strain distribution around weaker sections. By performing one-step and two-step stamping analyses, strains at the pit locations are compared with an experimental forming limit curve (FLC). Although the two-step stamping model reduces the susceptibility to cracking of the atomic fuel spacer grids over one-step stamping model, this study reveals that the fracture risk is higher, if a pit with relatively small radius and deep depth is located near the edge of the metal sheets. Therefore, it is recommended to identify the pits with critical size around the weaker sections before the SMF processes.

Keywords

Atomic fuel spacer grid Surface defects Pit Forming Finite element analysis Zircaloy-4 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shin MK, Lee HA, Lee JJ et al (2008) Optimization of a nuclear fuel spacer grid spring using homology constraints. Nucl Eng Des 238:2624–2634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song KN, Lee SB, Shin MK et al (2010) New spacer grid to enhance mechanical/structural performance. J Nucl Sci Technol 47:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee SH, Kim JY, Song KN (2007) Design improvement of an OPT-H type nuclear fuel rod support grid by using an axiomatic design and an optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 21:1191–1195. doi: 10.1007/BF03179035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu S, Fan C, Yang Y (2016) An impact test system design and its applications to dynamic buckling of a spacer grid assembly. Nucl Eng Des 308:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song K-N, Lee S-B, Lee S-H (2007) Performance evaluation of new spacer grid shapes for PWRs. Nucl Eng Technol 39:737–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoon K-H, Heo S-P, Song K-N, Jung Y-H (2004) Dynamic impact analysis of the grid structure using multi-point constraint (MPC) equation under the lateral impact load. Comput Struct 82:2221–2228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoon K, Lee K, Kang H, Song K (2006) Analysis of the optimized H type grid spring by a characterization test and the finite element method under the in-grid boundary. Nucl Eng Technol 38:375–382Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee S, Kim Y, Song K (2008) Parameter study for a dimple location in a space grid under the critical impact load. J Mech Sci Technol 22:2024–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim M, Bang S, Lee H et al (2014) Enhancement of dimple formability in sheet metals by 2-step forming. Mater Des 54:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim S-H, Kim S-H, Huh H (2002) Tool design in a multi-stage drawing and ironing process of a rectangular cup with a large aspect ratio using finite element analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:863–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang Y, Lo ZY, Du R (2006) Minimization of the thickness variation in multi-step sheet metal stamping. J Mater Process Technol 177:84–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abe Y, Mori K, Ebihara O (2002) Optimisation of the distribution of wall thickness in the multistage sheet metal forming of wheel disks. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:792–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim H-K, Hong SK (2007) FEM-based optimum design of multi-stage deep drawing process of molybdenum sheet. J Mater Process Technol 184:354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soltis J (2015) Passivity breakdown, pit initiation and propagation of pits in metallic materials—review. Corros Sci 90:5–22. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutcliffe G, Sutcliffe MFP, Georgiou S (2002) Characterisation of pit geometry in cold rolled stainless steel strip. Wear 252:963–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le HR, Sutcliffe MPF (2004) Finite element modelling of the evolution of surface pits in metal forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 145:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stephany A, Le HR, Sutcliffe MPF (2005) An efficient finite element model of surface pit reduction on stainless steel in metal forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 170:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abaqus (2014) User’s manual-Version 6.14. Dassault Systems Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rickhey F, Kim M, Lee H, Kim N (2015) Evaluation of combined hardening coefficients of zircaloy-4 sheets by simple shear test. Mater Des 65:995–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim M, Marimuthu KP, Lee JH, Lee H (2016) Spherical indentation method to evaluate material properties of high-strength materials. Int J Mech Sci 106:117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim M, Rickhey F, Lee H, Kim N (2015) Numerical approach to the evaluation of forming limit curves for zircaloy-4 sheet. J Mater Res 30:3277–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karuppasamy Pandian Marimuthu
    • 1
  • Wanseop Choi
    • 1
  • Naksoo Kim
    • 1
  • Hyungyil Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSogang UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations