Advertisement

A tool orientation smoothing method based on machine rotary axes for five-axis machining with ball end cutters

  • Rufeng XuEmail author
  • Xiang Cheng
  • Guangming Zheng
  • Zhitong Chen
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Avoiding significant fluctuations of tool orientation is an important problem in five-axis machining. The dramatic change of tool orientation may greatly increase the angular acceleration of machine rotary axes, produce larger nonlinear machining errors and gouging, reduce the feed rate of machine rotary axes, etc. In this paper, we propose a tool orientation smoothing method based on machine rotary axes for five-axis machining with ball end cutters to reduce fluctuations of tool orientation in the machine coordinate system (MCS). The core idea of the proposed method is to directly smooth machine rotary angles in the machine coordinate system for the smooth variation of tool orientation. First of all, we establish the relationship between the design variables of tool position and machine rotary angles. Then, we define an objective function of tool orientation smoothing based on machine rotary angles. In order to solve the above objective function, we also develop a simplified algorithm to obtain the minimum sum of squares of compound angular accelerations. Finally, a blade surface is used as a test example, and tool paths are generated by the Sturz and proposed methods, respectively. Comparison and analysis results show that the proposed method can improve the kinematics performance of five-axis machine tool, as well as surface machining quality and efficiency.

Keywords

Tool orientation smoothing Five-axis machining Machine rotary axes Sculptured surfaces Ball end cutters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lasemi A, Xue D, Gu P (2010) Recent development in CNC machining of freeform surfaces: a state-of-the-art review. Comput Aided Des 42(7):641–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vickers GW, Quan K (1989) Ball-mills versus end-mills for curved surface machining. ASME J Eng Ind 111(2):22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee Y (1997) Admissible tool orientation control of gouging avoidance for 5-axis complex surface machining. Comput Aided Des 29(7):507–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao N, Bedi S, Buchal R (1996) Implementation of the principal-axis method for machining of complex surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 11(4):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warkentin A, Ismail F, Bedi S (2000) Multi-point tool positioning strategy for 5-axis machining of sculptured surfaces. Comput Aided Geom Des 17(1):83–100MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gray PJ, Bedi S, Ismail F (2005) Arc-intersect method for 5-axis tool positioning. Comput Aided Des 37(7):663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsueh Y, Hsueh M, Lien H (2007) Automatic selection of cutter orientation for preventing the collision problem on a five-axis machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32(1–2):66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barakchi Fard MJ, Feng H (2009) Effect of tool tilt angle on machining strip width in five-axis flat-end milling of free-form surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(3–4):211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin Z, Shen H, Gan W, Fu J (2012) Approximate tool posture collision-free area generation for five-axis CNC finishing process using admissible area interpolation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):1191–1203Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du J, Yan X, Tian X (2012) The avoidance of cutter gouging in five-axis machining with a fillet-end milling cutter. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(1–4):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang Y, Liang C (1998) Cutting errors analysis for spindle-tilting type 5-axis NC machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14(6):399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castagnetti C, Duc E, Ray P (2008) The domain of admissible orientation concept: a new method for five-axis tool path optimisation. Comput Aided Des 40(9):938–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu XJ, Bradley C, Zhang YF, Loh HT, Wong YS (2002) Tool-path generation for five-axis machining of free-form surfaces based on accessibility analysis. Int J Prod Res 40(14):3253–3274CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jun C, Cha K, Lee Y (2003) Optimizing tool orientations for 5-axis machining by configuration-space search method. Comput Aided Des 35(6):549–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ho M, Hwang Y, Hu C (2003) Five-axis tool orientation smoothing using quaternion interpolation algorithm. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(12):1259–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang N, Tang K (2008) Five-axis tool path generation for a flat-end tool based on iso-conic partitioning. Comput Aided Des 40(12):1067–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu R, Chen Z, Chen W (2011) Tool positioning algorithm based on the smooth tool path for 5-axis machining of sculptured surfaces. Chin J Mech Eng 5(24):851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li LL, Zhang YF, Li HY, Geng L (2011) Generating tool-path with smooth posture change for five-axis sculptured surface machining based on cutter’s accessibility map. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5–8):699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farouki RT, Li S (2013) Optimal tool orientation control for 5-axis CNC milling with ball-end cutters. Comput Aided Geom Des 30(2):226–239MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun Y, Bao Y, Kang K, Guo D (2013) A cutter orientation modification method for five-axis ball-end machining with kinematic constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2863–2874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    He Y, Chen Z, Xu R, Wu X (2015) Reducing fluctuation of machining strip width by tool position modification for five-axis NC machining of sculptured surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(1–4):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang K, Tang K (2016) Optimal five-axis tool path generation algorithm based on double scalar fields for freeform surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1503–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farouki RT, Han CY, Li S (2014) Inverse kinematics for optimal tool orientation control in 5-axis CNC machining. Comput Aided Geom Des 31(1):13–26MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Srijuntongsiri G, Makhanov SS (2014) Optimisation of five-axis machining G-codes in the angular space. Int J Prod Res 53(11):3207–3227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rufeng Xu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiang Cheng
    • 1
  • Guangming Zheng
    • 1
  • Zhitong Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShandong University of TechnologyZiboChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Engineering and AutomationBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations