Non-retraction toolpath generation for irregular compound freeform surfaces with the LKH TSP solver

  • Zhiwei Lin
  • Jianzhong Fu
  • Yangfan Sun
  • Qing Gao
  • Guanhua Xu
  • Zhengtuo Wang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Toolpath planning for irregular-shaped compound freeform surfaces remains a challenge. This work presents a new approach for compound surface finishing by treating the toolpath planning task as a traveling salesman problem (TSP). The concept of curvature map is proposed. With this concept, the curvatures of the surface patches are recorded to corresponding cells of the map and then the path intervals are determined. The CC points as well as the normal vectors are calculated on the mesh model of the compound surface with a linear algorithm. The obtained CC points are linked as cities in LKH, in which the distance function is redefined to cope with the illegal linking problems. With LKH, tool retractions are no longer necessary. The resulted toolpath is capable of covering the whole compound surface with only one pass. The proposed toolpath generation method is more forgiving on the input. It does not require the surfaces to be perfectly conform on the joining boundaries. Several compound surface examples have been used to verify the feasibility of the proposed method.

Keywords

Non-retraction toolpath Curvature map Compound surface TSP LKH 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sun Y, Guo D, Jia Z, Wang H (2006) Iso-parametric tool path generation from triangular meshes for free-form surface machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(7):721–726Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen T, Shi Z (2008) A tool path generation strategy for three-axis ball-end milling of free-form surfaces. J Mater Process Technol 208(1–3):259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He W, Lei M, Bin H (2009) Iso-parametric CNC tool path optimization based on adaptive grid generation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(5–6):538–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Can A, Ünüvar A (2010) A novel iso-scallop tool-path generation for efficient five-axis machining of free-form surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(9–12):1083–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shen HY, Fu JZ, Chen ZC, Gan WF (2011) Iso-scallop controlled tool path generation for free-form surfaces based on level set method. Adv Sci Lett 4(8–10):3140–3145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin Z, Fu J, Shen H, Gan W (2014) A generic uniform scallop tool path generation method for five-axis machining of freeform surface. Comput Aided Des 56(0):120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yin Z (2004) Rough and finish tool-path generation for NC machining of freeform surfaces based on a multiresolution method. Comput Aided Des 36(12):1231–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ding S, Mannan MA, Poo AN, Yang DCH, Han Z (2005) The implementation of adaptive isoplanar tool path generation for the machining of free-form surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7–8):852–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng H-Y, Teng Z (2005) Iso-planar piecewise linear NC tool path generation from discrete measured data points. Comput Aided Des 37(1):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zou Q, Zhang J, Deng B, Zhao J (2014) Iso-level tool path planning for free-form surfaces. Comput Aided Des 53(0):117–125MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen ZC, Fu Q (2007) A practical approach to generating steepest ascent tool-paths for three-axis finish milling of compound NURBS surfaces. Comput Aided Des 39(11):964–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou B, Zhao JB, Li L (2015) CNC double spiral tool-path generation based on parametric surface mapping. Comput Aided Des 67-68:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang DCH, Chuang JJ, OuLee TH (2003a) Boundary-conformed toolpath generation for trimmed free-form surfaces. Comput Aided Des 35(2):127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang DCH, Chuang JJ, Han Z, Ding S (2003b) Boundary-conformed toolpath generation for trimmed free-form surfaces via coons reparametrization. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oulee TH, Yang DCH, Chuang JJ (2004) Boundary conformed toolpath generation via Laplace based parametric redistribution method. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the Asme 126(2):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li CL (2007) A geometric approach to boundary-conformed toolpath generation. Comput Aided Des 39(11):941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park SC, Choi BK (2000) Tool-path planning for direction-parallel area milling. Comput Aided Des 32(1):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cox JJ, Takezaki Y, Ferguson HR, Kohkonen KE, Mulkay EL (1994) Space-filling curves in tool-path applications. Comput Aided Des 26(3):215–224CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Griffiths JG (1994) Toolpath based on Hilbert's curve. Comput Aided Des 26(11):839–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anotaipaiboon W, Makhanov SS (2005) Tool path generation for five-axis NC machining using adaptive space-filling curves. Int J Prod Res 43(8):1643–1665CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anotaipaiboon W, Makhanov SS (2008) Curvilinear space-filling curves for five-axis machining. Comput Aided Des 40(3):350–367CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li W (2012) Research on Algorithms of Tool Path Generation of Complex Surface Machining Based on the Hilbert Curve in Fractal Theory (in Chinese). Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gan W-F, Fu J-Z, Shen H-Y, Chen Z-Y, Lin Z-W (2014) Five-axis tool path generation in CNC machining of T-spline surfaces. Comput Aided Des 52:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lin Z, Fu J, Shen H, Gan W, Yue S (2015) Tool path generation for multi-axis freeform surface finishing with the LKH TSP solver. Comput Aided Des 69:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin R-S, Koren Y (1996) Efficient tool-path planning for machining free-form surfaces. Vol. 118. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Helsgaun K (2009) General k-opt submoves for the Lin–Kernighan TSP heuristic. Math Program Comput 1(2–3):119–163MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Helsgaun K (2000) An effective implementation of the Lin–Kernighan traveling salesman heuristic. Eur J Oper Res 126(1):106–130MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiwei Lin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianzhong Fu
    • 1
  • Yangfan Sun
    • 2
  • Qing Gao
    • 2
  • Guanhua Xu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Zhengtuo Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, College of Mechanical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Process and Equipment of Zhejiang Province, College of Mechanical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Zhejiang University Kunshan Innovation InstituteKunshanChina

Personalised recommendations