Spot nanofinishing using ball nose magnetorheological solid rotating core tool

  • Akshay Khurana
  • Anant Kumar Singh
  • Talwinder Singh Bedi


The spot nanofinishing of surface plays an important role for improving the surface quality of miniature mechanical, electronics, and optics components. The nano-level finishing of these miniature components is highly demanded in today’s industry to fulfill the operational and functional requirement. The principal innovation of the present work is generating uniform magnetic field at the end of a magnetizable rotating core tool for providing a uniform surface roughness on a spot finishing of precision components. To fulfill this requirement, a ball nose magnetorheological nanofinishing process based on solid rotating core tool is developed. The existing ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) process uses a rotating core with central hole for flow of polishing fluid at the tool end surface. Due to central hole inside the rotating core, a non-uniform magnetic flux density has been experienced at the tool end surface which may result in non-uniform surface roughness in spot finishing, i.e., on a fixed location without any X-Y-axis linear feed rates. The magnetostatic finite element analysis clearly revealed the uniform magnetic flux density at the end surface of the solid rotating core tool than existing BEMRF tool core having central hole. The experimentation has been carried out for spot finishing on ferromagnetic workpiece surface in order to study the variation in surface roughness values. The present ball nose magnetorheological finishing process with solid rotating core tool produced uniform average surface roughness values as 20 nm from 290 nm after 90 min of spot finishing on the ferromagnetic workpiece surface. The experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of generating uniform magnetic field at the end of a magnetizable rotating core tool for a spot uniform nanofinishing of precision components.


Magnetorheological Spot Finishing Miniature surface Magnetic flux density Roughness MR polishing fluid 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jain VK, Ranjan P, Suri VK, Komanduri R (2010) Chemo-mechanical magneto-rheological finishing (CMMRF) of silicon for microelectronics applications. CIRP Ann–Manuf Technol 59(1):323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bedi TS, Singh AK (2016) Magnetorheological methods for nanofinishing—a review. Particul Sci Technol 34(4):412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kordonski WI, Jacobs SD (1996) Magnetorheological finishing. Int J Mod Phys B 10:2857–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jha S, Jain VK (2004) Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1019–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kordonski W, Shorey A (2007) Magnetorheological (MR) jet finishing technology. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 18:1127–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sadiq A, Shunmugam MS (2009) Investigation into magnetorheological abrasive honing (MRAH). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(7-8):554–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh AK, Jha S, Pandey PM (2011) Design and development of nanofinishing process for 3D surfaces using ball end MR finishing tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2012) Nanofinishing of flat workpiece using rotational-magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (R-MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(1):405–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen M, Liu H, Su Y, Yu B, Fang Z (2016) Design and fabrication of a novel magnetorheological finishing process for small concave surfaces using a ball-end permanent-magnet polishing head. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5):823–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shorey AB, Jacobs SD, Kordonski WI, Gans RF (2001) Experiments and observations regarding mechanisms of glass removal in magnetorheological finishing. Appl Opt 40(1):20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopez-Lopez MT, Kuzhir P, Lacis S, Bossis G, Gonzalez-Caballero F, Duran JDG (2006) Magnetorheology for suspensions of solid particles dispersed in ferro fluids. J Phys Condens Matter 18:s2803–s2813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carlson JD, Jolly MR (2000) MR fluid, foam and elastomers devices. Mechatron 10(4-5):555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng H, Feng Z, Wang Y, Lei S (2005) Magnetorheological finishing of SiC aspheric mirrors. Mater Manuf Process 20(6):917–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang J, Chen W, Han F (2015) Study on the magnetorheological finishing method for the WEDMed pierced die cavity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(9):1969–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sidpara A, Jain VK (2012) Experimental investigations into surface roughness and yield stress in magnetorheological fluid based nano-finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13(6):855–860Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh AK, Jha S, Pandey PM (2012) Nanofinishing of a typical 3D ferromagnetic workpiece using ball end magnetorheological finishing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 63:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niranjan MS, Jha S (2015) Experimental investigation into tool aging effect in ball end magnetorheological finishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(9):1895–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saraswathamma K, Jha S, Rao PV (2015) Experimentation investigation into ball end magnetorheological finishing of silicon. Precis Eng 42:218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh AK, Jha S, Pandey PM (2013) Mechanism of material removal in ball end magnetorheological finishing process. Wear 302:1180–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akshay Khurana
    • 1
  • Anant Kumar Singh
    • 1
  • Talwinder Singh Bedi
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations