Simultaneous optimization of blank shape and variable blank holder force of front side member manufacturing by deep drawing

  • Satoshi KitayamaEmail author
  • Shohei Yamada


This paper presents a method to determine an optimal blank shape minimizing earing for a front side member. In addition, variable blank holder force, meaning that the blank holder force (BHF) varies through punch stroke, is adopted. Blank shape directly affects the material cost, and it is important to determine an optimal blank shape minimizing earing that is trimmed out. BHF also have an influence on the product quality. Large BHF leads to tearing, whereas small BHF results in wrinkling. Variable BHF (VBHF) approach is recognized as one of the advanced manufacturing technologies, but it is difficult to determine the optimal VBHF for successful sheet metal forming. To determine the optimal blank shape and VBHF simultaneously, design optimization is performed. Numerical simulation in sheet metal forming is so intensive that a response surface approach is valid. In particular, a sequential approximate optimization that the response surface is repeatedly constructed and optimized is used to determine the optimal blank shape and VBHF. Front side member provided from NUMISHEET 2011 (BM3) is used for the numerical simulation. It is found from the numerical result that the proposed approach can drastically reduce the earing. In addition, the maximum thinning is much improved, compared with other results reported in NUMISHEET 2011.


Blank shape optimization Variable blank holder force Sequential approximate optimization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Obermeyer EJ, Majlessi SA (1998) A review of recent advances in the application of blank-holder force towards improving the forming limits of sheet metal parts. J Mater Process Technol 75:222–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sheng ZQ, Jirathearanat S, Altan T (2004) Adaptive FEM simulation for prediction of variable blank holder force in conical cup drawing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lo SW, Yang TC (2004) Closed-loop control of the blank holding force in sheet metal forming with a new embedded-type displacement sensor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang WR, Chen GL, Lin ZQ, Li SH (2007) Determination of optimal blank holder force trajectories for segmented binders of step rectangle box using PID closed-loop FEM simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1074–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin ZQ, Wang WR, Chen GL (2007) A new strategy to optimize variable blank holder force towards improving the forming limits of aluminum sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 183:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kitayama S, Hamano S, Yamazaki K, Kubo T, Nishikawa H, Kinoshita H (2010) A closed-loop type algorithm for determination of variable blank holder force trajectory and its application to square cup deep drawing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51:507–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jansson T, Nilsson L, Redhe M (2003) Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization—with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jakumeit J, Herdy M, Nitsche M (2005) Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29:498–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitayama S, Kita K, Yamazaki K (2012) Optimization of variable blank holder force trajectory by sequential approximate optimization with RBF network. J Adv Manuf Technol 61(9–12):1067–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ingarao G, Di Lorenzo R (2010) Optimization methods for complex sheet metal stamping computer aided engineering. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42:459–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park SH, Yoon JH, Yang DY, Kim YH (1999) Optimum blank design in sheet metal forming by the deformation path iteration method. International Journal of Mechanical Science 41:1217–1232CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Goel A, Yang F, Gau JT (2009) Blank optimization for sheet metal forming using multi-step finite element simulations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:709–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oliveira MC, Padmanabhan R, Baptista AJ, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2009) Sensitivity study on some parameters in blank design. Mater Des 30:1223–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hino R, Yoshida F, Toropov VV (2006) Optimum blank design for sheet metal forming based on the interaction of high- and low-fidelity FE models. Arch Appl Mech 75(10):679–691CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Y, Chen W, Ding L, Wang X (2013) Response surface methodology based on support vector regression for polygon blank shape optimization design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1397–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitayama S, Saikyo M, Kawamoto K, Yamamichi K (2015) Multi-objective optimization of blank shape for deep drawing with variable blank holder force via sequential approximate optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52:1001–1012MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu, H., Chung, K., Han, S.S., Chung, W,J., (2011), The NUMISHEET 2011 benchmark study of the 8th international conference and workshop on numerical simulation of 3D sheet metal forming processes (Part C, benchmark problems and results)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kitayama S, Arakawa M, Yamazaki K (2011) Sequential approximate optimization using radial basis function network for engineering optimization. Optim Eng 12(4):535–557CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hillmann, M., Kubli, W., (1999), Optimization of sheet metal forming processes using simulation programs, in : Numisheet ‘99, Beasnc, France, 1: 287–292Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang H, Li E, Li GY (2009) The least square support vector regression coupled with parallel sampling scheme metamodeling technique and application in sheet forming optimization. Mater Des 30:1468–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang H, Li E, Li GY (2010) Parallel boundary and best neighbor searching sampling algorithm for drawbead design optimization in sheet metal forming. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cao J, Kinsey B, Solla SA (2000) Consistent and minimal springback using a stepped binder force trajectory and neural network control. J Eng Mater Technol 122:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu G, Lin Z, Xu W, Bao Y (2002) Variable blankholer force in U-shaped part forming for eliminating springback error. J Mater Process Technol 120:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kitayama S, Huang S, Yamazaki K (2013) Optimization of variable blank holder force trajectory for springback reduction via sequential approximate optimization with radial basis function network. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kanazawa UniversityKanazawaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Natural Science and TechnologyKanazawa UniversityKanazawaJapan

Personalised recommendations