Advertisement

A collaborative machine tool maintenance planning system based on content management technologies

  • Shan Wan
  • Dongbo Li
  • James Gao
  • Rajkumar Roy
  • Fei He
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

From product maintenance and service point of view, high-value sophisticated computer numerical control (CNC) machine tools in modern manufacturing factories play important roles: they are manufacturing equipment, and on the other hand, they are also products supplied by equipment manufacturers. There is a trend that manufacturers are extending their responsibilities to the products use phase to meet customers’ requirements for lifetime support and service. To ensure the effective performance and efficient maintenance of high-value machine tools, information and knowledge from their lifecycle should be collected and reused. However, in the research area of product service systems and related computerised maintenance systems, there is a lack of research work on how to integrate knowledge from different stakeholders into the maintenance and service planning process, which is important for modern digital manufacturing systems to reduce machine tools’ downtime and improve their working performance. This project proposed a collaborative maintenance planning framework to connect different stakeholders and integrate their knowledge into the maintenance and service process. The potential of advanced content management systems (CMSs), which are widely used non-engineering sectors such as finance, business, publishing and government organisations, has been explored and tested for applications in the manufacturing engineering domain. The research realised that CMSs have several advantages compared with traditional engineering information systems, especially in managing dynamic and unstructured knowledge. A prototype maintenance and service planning system has been developed and evaluated using a real CNC machine tool.

Keywords

Product service system Content management system Knowledge management Process management Machine tool maintenance and service 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Söderholm P, Holmgren M, Klefsjö B (2007) A process view of maintenance and its stakeholders. J Qual Maint Eng 13:19–32. doi: 10.1108/13552510710735096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Metso L, Marttonen S, Thenent NE, Newnes LB (2016) Adapting the SHEL model in investigating industrial maintenance. J Qual Maint Eng 22:62–80. doi: 10.1108/JQME-12-2014-0059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou G, Li Y, Liu C, Hao X (2016) A feature-based automatic broken surfaces fitting method for complex aircraft skin parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:1001–1011. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7774-y Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu X, Li Y, Ma S, Lee C (2015) A tool path generation method for freeform surface machining by introducing the tensor property of machining strip width. Comput Aided Des 66:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2015.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Essop IA, Evans RD, Wan S, Giddaluru MP, Gao JX, Baudry D, Mahdikhah S et al (2016) Investigation into current industrial practices relating to product lifecycle management in a multi-national manufacturing company. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 13:647–661. doi: 10.1080/16864360.2016.1150711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu Q, Jiang P. (2009) An outsourcing e-maintenance system for improving maintenance of an industrial product service system. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 16-19:1077-1081. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.16-19.1077Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Do N (2015) Integration of engineering change objects in product data management databases to support engineering change analysis. Comput Ind 73:69–81. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srinivasan V (2011) An integration framework for product lifecycle management. Comput Aided Des 43:464–478. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2008.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khodakarami F, Chan YE (2014) Exploring the role of customer relationship management (CRM) systems in customer knowledge creation. Information & Management 51:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2013.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rastegari A, Mobin M. Maintenance decision making, supported by computerized maintenance management system, in: 2016 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Tucson, AZ, 2016, 1–8, doi:  10.1109/RAMS.2016.7448086
  11. 11.
    Duffield S, Whitty SJ (2015) Developing a systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects. Int J Proj Manag 33:311–324. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clair KM (2012) Metadata best practices in web content management systems. Journal of Library Metadata 4:362–371. doi: 10.1080/19386389.2012.735562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wan S, Gao J, Li D, Tong Y, He F. Web-based process planning for machine tool maintenance and services, in: Procedia CIRP, Cranfield, England, 2015,165–170, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.018
  14. 14.
    Mont OK (2002) Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J Clean Prod 10:237–245. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tran T, Park JY (2016) Development of a novel set of criteria to select methodology for designing product service systems. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 3:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jcde.2015.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sakao T, Ölundh Sandström G, Matzen D (2009) Framing research for service orientation of manufacturers through PSS approaches. J Manuf Technol Manag 20:754–778. doi: 10.1108/17410380910961082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Potes Ruiz P, Kamsu Foguem B, Grabot B (2014) Generating knowledge in maintenance from experience feedback. Knowl-Based Syst 68:4–20. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garon S (2006) Space project management lessons learned: a powerful tool for success. J Knowl Manag 10:103–112. doi: 10.1108/13673270610656665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Potes Ruiz PA, Kamsu-Foguem B, Noyes D (2013) Knowledge reuse integrating the collaboration from experts in industrial maintenance management. Knowl-Based Syst 50:171–186. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frost A. (2010) An educational KM site—knowledge sharing. http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/knowledge-sharing.html, Accessed 1 August 2016
  21. 21.
    Borsato M (2014) Bridging the gap between product lifecycle management and sustainability in manufacturing through ontology building. Comput Ind 65:258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2013.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fortineau V, Paviot T, Lamouri S (2013) Improving the interoperability of industrial information systems with description logic-based models—the state of the art. Comput Ind 64:363–375. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2013.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Penciuc D, Durupt A, Belkadi F, Eynard B, Rowson H (2014) Towards a PLM interoperability for a collaborative design support system. Procedia CIRP 25:369–376. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Su K, Hwang S, Chou Y (2006) Applying knowledge structure to the usable fault diagnosis assistance system: a case study of motorcycle maintenance in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 31:370–382. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ricadela A (2000) Microsoft’s knowledge push. Information Week 805:151Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang SF, Wang Q, Liu L. (2010) Fault diagnosis system based on knowledge pushing (in Chinese). Journal of Aerospace Power, 25:203–207. http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_hkdlxb201001033.aspx
  27. 27.
    Wang ZS, Tian L, Wu YH, Liu BB (2016) Personalized knowledge push system based on design intent and user interest. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C. J Mech Eng Sci 230:1757–1772. doi: 10.1177/0954406215584395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gagnon ML (2011) Moving knowledge to action through dissemination and exchange. J Clin Epidemiol 64:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Frost A. (2010) An educational KM site—content management systems http://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/knowledge-management-systems.html, Accessed 1 August 2016.
  30. 30.
    Patel SK, Rathod VR, Parikh S. Joomla, Drupal and WordPress—a statistical comparison of Open Source CMS, in: 3rd International Conference on Trends in Information Science & Computing (TISC2011), Chennai, India, 2011,182–187, doi:  10.1109/TISC.2011.6169111
  31. 31.
    Staccini P, Bordonado C, Alet J, Joubert M, Dufour JC, Fieschi M. A customized open source content management system to support collaborative distance learning: the J@LON platform, in: Twentieth IEEE International symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS’ 07), Maribor, Slovenia, 2007, 651–656. doi: 10.1109/CBMS.2007.4Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yen C, Yen C, Hsu J. A web-based CMS/PDM integration for product design and manufacturing, in: e-Business Engineering, 2008. ICEBE’ 08. IEEE International Conference on. Xi'An, China, 2008. 549–553. doi:  10.1109/ICEBE.2008.104
  33. 33.
    Paul M, Engelhart M, Rus I, Lindvall M (2002) Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Softw 19:26–38. doi: 10.1109/MS.2002.1003450 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brandt SC, Morbach J, Miatidis M, Theißen M, Jarke M, Marquardt W (2008) An ontology-based approach to knowledge management in design processes. Comput Chem Eng 32:320–342. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    RealStoryGroup. (2016) Real Story Group—make better technology decisions. https://www.realstorygroup.com/Vendors-Evaluated/, Accessed 1 May 2016
  36. 36.
    Babbar P, Ghag A, Singh N, Hess M. (2008) The Drupal overview | Drupal.org.https://www.drupal.org/, Accessed 28 April 2016

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shan Wan
    • 1
  • Dongbo Li
    • 1
  • James Gao
    • 2
  • Rajkumar Roy
    • 3
  • Fei He
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and ScienceUniversity of GreenwichKentUK
  3. 3.School of Aerospace, Transport and ManufacturingCranfield UniversityBedfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations