Advertisement

A lightweight and support-free design method for selective laser melting

  • Zhonghua Li
  • David Zhengwen Zhang
  • Peng Dong
  • Ibrahim Kucukkoc
Open Access
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Topology optimisation is an effective approach to design extreme lightweight components. However, most of the resulted optimum lightweight components usually have complex structures which cannot be produced successfully by traditional manufacturing processes. Selective laser melting is one of the additive manufacturing processes. It shows powerful capacity in the manufacturing of metal components with complex structures. Therefore, the combination of topology optimisation and selective laser melting shows a promising prospect for metal components. However, support structures were usually introduced during the selective laser melting manufacturing process, which resulted to some disadvantages, for example, the support structures are generally difficult to remove from the original components because it is difficult to clamping and machining. Therefore, a design method was proposed in this study, named lightweight and support-free design method, the detailed design process and advantages were presented. In the design process, topology optimisation was applied to realise lightweight design, and support-free design process was developed to meet the support-free requirement. Finally, as a case, a cross-beam component was designed using the proposed method, and the final model was produced successfully using selective laser melting process. The case study result verified that the proposed design method is effective to design lightweight and support-free industrial metal components for SLM process.

Keywords

Selective laser melting Topology optimisation Lightweight Support-free 

References

  1. 1.
    Adam GAO, Zimmer D (2014) Design for additive manufacturing—element transitions and aggregated structures. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7(1):20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2013.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aremu A, Ashcroft I, Hague R, Wildman R, Tuck C (2010) Suitability of SIMP and BESO topology optimization algorithms for additive manufacture. Paper presented at the 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (SFF)–An Additive Manufacturing ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aremu A, Ashcroft I, Wildman R, Hague R, Tuck C, Brackett D (2013) The effects of bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization parameters on an industrial designed component for additive manufacture. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 227(6):794–807. doi: 10.1177/0954405412463857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhavar V, Kattire P, Patil V, Khot S, Gujar K, Singh R (2014) A review on powder bed fusion technology of metal additive manufacturing. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference and Exhibition on Additive Manufacturing Technologies-AM-2014, September 1–2, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R (2011) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium, 348–362Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calignano F (2014) Design optimization of supports for overhanging structures in aluminum and titanium alloys by selective laser melting. Mater Des 64:203–213. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chahine G, Smith P, Kovacevic R (2010) Application of topology optimization in modern additive manufacturing. Paper presented at the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Austin, Texas, 606–618Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang K-H, Tang P-S (2001) Integration of design and manufacturing for structural shape optimization. Adv Eng Softw 32(7):555–567CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kranz J, Herzog D, Emmelmann C (2015) Design guidelines for laser additive manufacturing of lightweight structures in TiAl6V4. J Laser Appl 27(S1):S14001. doi: 10.2351/1.4885235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leary M, Babaee M, Brandt M, Subic A (2013) Feasible build orientations for self-supporting fused deposition manufacture: a novel approach to space-filling Tesselated geometries. Adv Mater Res 633:148–168. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leary M, Merli L, Torti F, Mazur M, Brandt M (2014) Optimal topology for additive manufacture: a method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Mater Des 63:678–690. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee Y-S, González JA, Lee JH, Kim YI, Park KC, Han S (2016) Structural topology optimization of the transition piece for an offshore wind turbine with jacket foundation. Renew Energy 85:1214–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lynch ME, Gu W, El-Wardany T, Hsu A, Viens D, Nardi A, Klecka M (2013) Design and topology/shape structural optimisation for additively manufactured cold sprayed components. Virtual and Physical Prototyping 8(3):213–231. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2013.837629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Materialise (2016) 3D Printing Software, http://software.materialise.com/magics. Accessed 25 June 2016
  15. 15.
    Seabra L M R (2015) Design optimisation for selective laser melting (SLM) and experimental testing of an aircraft componentGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strano G, Hao L, Everson RM, Evans KE (2012) A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1247–1254. doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4403-x Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas D (2009) The development of design rules for selective laser melting. PhD Thesis. University of WalesGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tomlin M, Meyer J (2011) Topology optimization of an additive layer manufactured (ALM) aerospace part. Paper presented at the The 7th Altair CAE Technology Conference, Gaydon, UK, 10th May, 1–9Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang D, Yang Y, Liu R, Xiao D, Sun J (2013) Study on the designing rules and processability of porous structure based on selective laser melting (SLM). J Mater Process Technol 213(10):1734–1742. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiao D-m, Yang Y-q, Su X-b, Di W, Luo Z-y (2012) Topology optimization of microstructure and selective laser melting fabrication for metallic biomaterial scaffolds. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22(10):2554–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zegard T, Paulino GH (2015) Bridging topology optimization and additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(1):175–192. doi: 10.1007/s00158-015-1274-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Y, Bernard A, Gupta RK, Harik R (2014) Evaluating the design for additive manufacturing: a process planning perspective. Procedia CIRP 21:144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhonghua Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Zhengwen Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peng Dong
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ibrahim Kucukkoc
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Mechanical TransmissionsChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  3. 3.Capital Aerospace Machinery CompanyBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of Industrial EngineeringBalikesir University, Cagis CampusBalikesirTurkey

Personalised recommendations