Advertisement

Influence of different control strategies in wire electrical discharge machining of varying height job

  • Abhishek SamantaEmail author
  • Mukandar Sekh
  • Soumya Sarkar
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In this article, the wire electrical discharge machining of different heights of die steel workpieces has been carried out for different control strategies, i.e. proportional control mode, constant speed mode, constant voltage mode, and constant area feeding mode. It is very crucial to understand the thermo-mechanical aspect of the machining gap during machining of changing job height. For the efficient machining of variable thickness of jobs, these observations are extremely essential. Here, it is observed how job height influences cutting speed, surface roughness, kerf width, gap voltage, gap current, input power, and specific energy consumption under these control strategies. So far, very little research work has been reported in this area. Thus, it is quite imperative to carry out an intensive research study of wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) during machining of different job thickness under those control strategies. An attempt has been made to understand the nature of variation of these important response parameters. The average and variance of some of the most influential parameters, i.e., cutting speed, surface finish, and kerf width were also calculated. Along with this, to predict the different important response parameters, i.e., cutting speed, surface finish, and kerf width for any given height job under any specified control strategy, regression analysis was carried out.

Keywords

WEDM Additive model Die steel Different height job Control strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jain VK (2002) Advanced machining processes. Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd, MumbaiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liao YS, Huang JT, Su HC (1997) A study on the machining—parameters optimisation of wire electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 71:487–493. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00117-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spedding TA, Wang ZQ (1997) Study on modeling of wire EDM process. J Mater Process Technol 69:18–28. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(96)00033-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karthikkeyan R, Lakshmi Narayanan PR, Naagarazan RS (1999) Mathematical modeling for electric discharge machining of aluminum–silicon carbide particulate composites. J Mater Process Technol 87:59–63. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00332-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarkar S, Mitra S, Bhattacharyya B (2005) Parametric optimisation of wire electrical discharge machining of γ titanium aluminide alloy through an artificial neural network model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:501–508. doi: 10.1007/s00170-004-2203-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tosun N, Cogun C, Tosun G (2004) A study on kerf and material removal rate in wire electrical discharge machining based on Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 152:316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raksiri C, Chatchaikulsiri P (2010) CNC wire-cut parameter optimized determination of the stair shape workpiece. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 70:101–106Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malleswara Rao SS, Parameswara Rao Ch VS (2013) Parametric evaluation for machining die steel with WEDM. IJSRP 3:1–5, 10.1.1.300.5755Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarkar S, Mitra S, Bhattacharyya B (2005) Geometry analysis and corner compensation strategy in WEDM for enhanced profile accuracy. In: Proceeding of 4th National Conference on Precision Engineering (COPEN). Jadavpur University, Kolkata, pp 154–160Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanlayasiri K, Boonmung S (2007) An investigation on effects of wire EDM machining parameters on surface roughness of newly developed DC53 die steel. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:26–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scott D, Boyina S, Rajurkar KP (1991) Analysis and optimization of parameter combinations in wire electrical discharge machining. Int J Prod Res 29:2189–2207. doi: 10.1080/00207549108948078 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin CT, Chung IF, Huang SY (2001) Improvement of machining accuracy by fuzzy logic at corner parts for wire EDM. Fuzzy Set Syst 122:499–511. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00034-8 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liao YS, Yan MT, Chang CC (2002) A neural network approach for the on-line estimation of workpiece height in WEDM. J Mater Process Technol 121:252–258. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01252-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mori T (1990) The new experimental design: Taguchi’s approach to quality engineering. ASI press, DearbornGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Production Engineering, Haldia Institute of TechnologyHaldiaIndia
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering, Aliah UniversityKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, JadavpurKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations