Advertisement

Parallelism error measurement for the spindle axis of machine tools by two circular tests with different tool lengths

  • Kwang-Il Lee
  • Dong-Hwan Shin
  • Seung-Han YangEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In this study, parallelism errors between the spindle axis and the linear axis of machine tools were measured using a double ball-bar. Specifically, two circular tests were performed to measure the parallelism errors using tool balls with different tool lengths and a workpiece ball fixed to a workpiece table. Parallelism errors were calculated by analyzing, simultaneously, the measured double ball-bar (DBB) data from the circular tests. The proposed method provides accurate measurements due to a large offset between the circular tests within the working space of machine tools. Additionally, the approach only requires a DBB and adjustment/extension fixtures; thus, it simplifies measurements and is cost-effective.

Keywords

Circular test Double ball-bar Machine tools Parallelism errors Spindle axis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a review part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(9):1235–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee KI, Lee DM, Yang SH (2012) Parametric modeling and estimation of geometric errors for a rotary axis using double ball-bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(5–8):741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xiang S, Yang J, Zhang Y (2014) Using a double ball bar to identify position-independent geometric errors on the rotary axes of five-axis machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:2071–2082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 230–1 (2012) “Test code for machine tools—part 1: geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or quasi-static conditions,” ISOGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwenke H, Knapp W, Haitjema H, Weckenmann A, Schmitt R, Delbressine F (2008) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines—an update. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(2):660–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibaraki S, Knapp W (2012) Indirect measurement of volumetric accuracy for three-axis and five-axis machine tools: a review. Int J Autom Technol 6(2):110–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO 230–7 (2006) “Test code for machine tools—part 7: geometric accuracy of axes of rotation,” 2006Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tu JF, Bossmanns B, Hung SCC (1997) Modeling and error analysis for assessing spindle radial error motions. Precis Eng 21(2–3):90–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee ES, Wi HG (1998) A comprehensive technique for measuring the three-dimensional positioning accuracy of a rotating object. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14(5):330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castro HFF (2008) A method for evaluating spindle rotation errors of machine tools using a laser interferometer. Measurement 41(5):526–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu CH, Jywe WY, Lee HW (2004) Development of a simple test device for spindle error measurement using a position sensitive detector. Meas Sci Technol 15(9):1733–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jywe WY, Chen CJ (2005) The development of a high-speed spindle measurement system using a laser diode and a quadrants sensor. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(10):1162–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jywe WY, Chen CJ (2007) A new 2D error separation technique for performance tests of CNC machine tools. Precis Eng 31(4):369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO 10791–2 (2001) “Test conditions for machining centres—part 2: geometric tests for machines with vertical spindle or universal heads with vertical primary rotary axis,” ISOGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee KI, Yang SH (2014) Circular tests for accurate performance evaluation of machine tools via an analysis of eccentricity. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15(12):2499–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee KI, Yang SH (2013) Measurement and verification of position-independent geometric errors of a five-axis machine tool using a double ball-bar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 70:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO 230–2 (2006) “Test code for machine tools—part 2: determination of accuracy and repeatability of positioning numerically controlled axes,” ISOGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee DM, Zhu Z, Lee KI, Yang SH (2011) Identification and measurement of geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool with a tilting head using a double ball-bar. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 12(2):337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO/TR 230–9 (2005) “Test code for machine tools—part 9: estimation of measurement uncertainty for machine tool tests according to series ISO 230, Basic Equations,” ISOGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee DM, Cha YT, Yang SH (2010) Analysis of eccentricity in the ball bar measurement. J Mech Sci Technol 24(1):271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mechanical Engineering TechnologyKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.Division of Convergence Research Center for Future Automotive TechnologyDGISTDaeguSouth Korea
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations