Advertisement

Investigations on surface quality, surface integrity and specific energy consumption in finishing of straight bevel gears by PECH process

  • Sunil Pathak
  • N. K. JainEmail author
  • I. A Palani
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Applications of electrochemical finishing (ECF) and its hybridization with the other mechanical processes are attracting the interest for finishing various engineering components due to their flexible behavior. Pulse electrochemical honing (PECH) is a hybrid finishing process which provides benefits of pulsed ECF and mechanical honing processes simultaneously to improve the surface quality and surface integrity of the workpiece components. The present study is aimed at studying the effects of the three most important PECH parameters namely applied voltage, electrolyte composition, and electrolyte concentration on the aspects of surface quality (i.e., surface roughness, waviness, material ratio curve), of surface integrity (i.e., wear indicators, microhardness, microstructure, and residual stresses), and of finishing productivity (i.e., material removal rate) of the straight bevel gears made of alloy steel (20MnCr5) by the PECH process. An aqueous mixture of non-passivating electrolyte (i.e., NaCl) and passivating electrolyte NaNO3 was used as electrolyte. The three input parameters were varied at three levels to identify their optimum combination using preidentified optimum values of other process parameters. The identified optimum values are 75 % NaCl + 25 % NaNO3 as electrolyte composition, 7.5 % as electrolyte concentration, and 8 V as applied voltage while finishing the bevel gears for an optimum duration of 6 min. Results have shown significant improvement in surface roughness (i.e., the average surface roughness value reduced from 2.84 to 1.03 μm; the maximum surface roughness value decreased from 24.59 to 6.06 μm; depth of roughness reduced from 13.51 to 5.42 μm) and surface waviness (i.e., average waviness reduced from 5.04 to 1.58 μm; maximum waviness reduced from 30.17 to 5.52 μm). Analysis of microstructure, residual stresses, material ratio curve, wear indicators, and microhardness of the PECH-finished gears also showed significant improvement in them compared to an unfinished gear. Comparative analysis of energy consumption in PECH and ECH processes found that PECH consumes 25 % less energy than the ECH process does for achieving the same level of finishing. The present work proves that PECH is a superior, productive, and more energy-efficient process compared to the conventional gear finishing processes and ECH process.

Keywords

Bevel gear PECH Surface quality Surface integrity Energy Fatigue Material removal rate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Karpuschewski B, Knoche HJ, Hipke M (2008) Gear finishing by abrasive processes. CIRP Ann 57(1):621–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaikh JH, Jain NK, Pathak S (2015) Investigations on surface quality improvement of straight bevel gears by electrochemical honing process. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf. doi: 10.1177/0954405415584899 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajurkar KP, Schnacker CL, Lindsay RP (1988) Some aspects of ECM performance and control. CIRP Ann 37(1):183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Datta M, Landolt D (2000) Fundamental aspects and applications of electrochemical micro-fabrication. Electrochim Acta 45(15–16):2535–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madore C, Piotrowski O, Landolt D (1999) Through mask electrochemical micromachining of titanium. J Electrochem Soc 146(7):2526–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Capello G, Bertoglio S (1979) A new approach by electrochemical finishing of hardened cylindrical gear tooth face. CIRP Ann 28(1):103–107Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Misra JP, Jain NK, Jain PK (2010) Investigations on precision finishing of helical gears by electrochemical honing process. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 224:1817–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Misra JP, Jain PK, Jain NK, Singh H (2012) Effects of electrolyte composition and temperature on precision finishing of spur gears by pulse electrochemical honing (PECH). Int J Precision Technol 3(1):37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shaikh JH, Jain NK, Venkatesh VC (2013) Precision finishing of bevel gears by electrochemical honing. Mater Manuf Process 28(10):1117–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Datta M, Landolt D (1981) Electrochemical machining under pulsed current conditions. Electrochim Acta 26(7):899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fang X, Qu N, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Zhu D (2014) Effects of pulsating electrolyte flow in electrochemical machining. J Mater Process Technol 214(1):36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pathak S, Jain NK, Palani IA (2014) On use of pulsed electrochemical honing to improve micro-geometry of bevel gears. Mater Manuf Process 29(11–12):1461–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pathak S, Jain NK, Palani IA (2015) Influence of electrolyte flow rate and rotary speed on surface modification of bevel gear finished by PECH. Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Surface Modification Technologies (SMT29), Technical University of Denmark, 10–12Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pathak S, Jain NK, Palani IA (2015) Effect of honing gear hardness on micro-geometry and surface quality improvement of straight bevel gears in PECH process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7596-y Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pathak S, Jain NK, Palani IA (2015) On surface quality and wear resistance of straight bevel gears finished by pulsed electrochemical honing process. Int J Electrochem Sci 10(11):8869–8885Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pathak S, Jain NK, Palani IA (2015) Process performance comparison of ECH and PECH for quality enhancement of bevel gears. Mater Manuf Process 30(7):836–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moldovean G, Butuc B, Velicu R, Garvila CC (2011) Mechanical efficiency of straight bevel gears used in photovoltaic trackers depending on geometrical accuracy. 13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghosh SS, Chakarborty G (2013) The influence of friction force on modified gear teeth and its effect on bearing force. 1st International and 16th National Conference on Machines and Mechanisms, IIT Roorkee, IndiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology IndoreIndoreIndia

Personalised recommendations