Surface integrity analysis of abrasive water jet-cut surfaces of friction stir welded joints

  • Ratnesh Kumar
  • Somnath Chattopadhyaya
  • Amit Rai Dixit
  • Bhabani Bora
  • Michal Zelenak
  • Josef Foldyna
  • Sergej Hloch
  • Petr Hlavacek
  • Jiri Scucka
  • Jiri Klich
  • Libor Sitek
  • Pedro Vilaca
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Nowadays, the abrasive water jet (AWJ) technology is much in use for cutting materials into complex shapes with high dimensional accuracy. The objective of the present paper is to study the topography as well as the roughness of the surfaces in friction stir welded (FSW) joints, machined by AWJ. It discusses machinability of the FSW joints by AWJ. Subsequently, this paper makes a critical analysis of the surface properties by optical profilometer. Top and bottom surfaces, created by FSW, have also been analyzed using an optical 3D measurement system to determine the morphology and topographic parameters. FSW possesses favourable joining properties and generates a minimum heat-affected zone (HAZ) because of its comparatively low temperature coalescence. Three friction stir welding samples were prepared at 500, 710 and 1000 rpm with a welding speed of 40 mm/min on AA 6101-T6. After analysis, it was found that the sample prepared at 500 rpm and with welding speed of 40 mm/min produces a surface fit for industrial applications in terms of surface roughness and dimensional accuracy. It has also been observed that unlike other conventional or non-conventional processes, no HAZ is generated during the cutting of FSW joints by using the AWJ technology.

Keywords

Friction stir welding (FSW) Abrasive water jet (AWJ) Optical profilometer Topography Surface roughness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Botak Z, Kondic Z, Maderic D (2009) Water jet machining. Tech Gaz 16(3):97–101Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Momber WA, Kovacevic R (1998) Principles of abrasive water jet machining. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hreha P, Hloch S, Magurova D, Valicek J, Kozak D, Harnicarova M, Rakin M (2010) Water jet technology used in medicine. Tech Gaz 17(2):237–240Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needhan JC, Murch MG, Templesmith P, Dawes CJ (1991) International patent application PCT/GB92/02203 and GB patent application no. 9125978.9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra RS, Ma ZY (2005) Friction stir welding and processing. Mater Sci Eng R 50:1–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.M. Thomas, D.G. Staines, P.J. Oakley, ER Watts, (2005) Friction stir welding for aluminum applications—process development, In: Proceedings of the 5th international forum on aluminum ships,. 137–44 in Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibson BT, Lammlein DH, Prater TJ, Longhurst WR, Cox CX, Ballun MC, Dharmaraj KJ, Cook GE, Strauss AM (2004) Friction stir welding: process, automation and control. J Manuf Process 16:56–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Cénac et al. (2013) Abrasive water-jet milling of aeronautic aluminum 2024-T3. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 227(3).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Birtu Cristian, Avramescu Valeriu, (2012) Abrasive water jet cutting—technique, equipment, performances, Nonconventional Technologies Review Romania, 40–46.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selvan M, Chithirai P, Raju N, Mohana S, Rajavel R (2011) Effect of process parameter on depth of cut in abrasive waterjet cutting of cast iron. Int J Sci Eng Res 2:9,1–5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hlavacek P, Valicek J, Hloch S, Greger M, Foldyna J, Ivandic Z, Sitek L, Kusnerova M, Zelenak M (2009) Measurement of fine grain copper surface texture created by abrasive water jet technology. Strojarstvo 51(4):273–279Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ushasta A, Simul B, Asish B, Kumar DP (2014) Abrasive water jet cutting of borosilicate glass. Procedia Mater Sci 6:775–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valicek J, Hloch S, Kozak D(2009) Surface geometric parameters proposal for the advanced control of abrasive water jet technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu S, Wang J (2006) A study of abrasive water jet cutting of alumina ceramics with controlled nozzle oscillation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jyri PA, Louhisalmi YA, Karjalainen JA, Sascha F (2007) Cutting thin sheet metal with a water jet guided laser using various cutting distances, feed speeds and angles of incidence. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:961–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zsolt M (2013) Energy approach of the taper at abrasive water jet cutting. Prod Process Syst 6(1):89–96Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barcik S, Kvietkova M, Kminiak R, Alac P (2011) Optimization of cutting process of medium density fireboards by the abrasive water jet. Drvna Industrija 62(4):263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paul S, Hoogstrate AM, Luttervelt CA, van Kals HJJ (1998) Analytical and experimental modelling of the abrasive water jet cutting of ductile materials. J Mater Process Technol 73:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valicek J, Drzik M, Hloch S, Ohlidal M, Luptak M, Gombar M, Radvanska A, Hlavacek P, Palenikova K (2007) Experimental analysis of irregularities of metallic surfaces generated by abrasive water jet. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:1786–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chandrakanth S, Deng X, Bayoumi AE (2003) Finite element simulation of high pressure water jet assisted metal cutting. Int J Mech Sci 45:1201–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arola D, Ramulu M (1997) Material removal in abrasive water jet machining of metals surface integrity and texture. Wear 210:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hassan AI, Kosmol J (2001) Dynamic elastic-plastic analysis of 3D deformation in abrasive waterjet machining. J Mater Process Technol 113:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saleem M, Zitoune R, El Sawi I, Bougherara H (2015) Role of the surface quality on the mechanical behaviour of CFRP bolted composite joints. Int J Fatigue 80:246–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haddad M, Zitoune R, Bougherara H, Eyma F, Castanie B (2014) Study of trimming damages of CFRP structures in function of the machining processes and their impact on mechanical behaviour. Compos Part B 57:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haddad M, Zitoune R, Eyma F, Castanie B (2015) Influence of machining process and machining induced surface roughness on mechanical properties of continuous fibre composites. Eng Mech 55:519–528Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wei Z, Guo C (2014) Topography and microstructure of the cutting surface machined with abrasive water jet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:941–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deam RT, Lemma E, Ahmed DH (2004) Modelling of abrasive water jet cutting process. Wear 257:877–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Begic HD, Ahmet C, Muhamed M, Almina D (2015) Experimental study on surface roughness in abrasive water jet cutting. Procedia Eng 100:394–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marusic V, Baralic J, Nedic B, Rosendic Z (2013) Effect of machining parameters on jet lagging in abrasive water jet cutting. Tech Gaz 20(4):677–682Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Badgujar PP, Rathi MG (2014) Analysis of surface roughness in abrasive water jet cutting of stainless steel. Int J Eng Res Technol 3(6):209–212Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ma C, Deam RT (2006) A correlation for predicting the kerf profile from abrasive water jet cutting. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 30:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sharma V, Chattopadhyaya S, Hloch S (2011) Multi response optimization of process parameters based on Taguchi-fuzzy model for coal cutting by water jet technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poon CY, Bharat B (1995) Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact optical profiler. Wear 190:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zelenak M, Valicek J, Klich J, Zidkova P (2012) Comparison of Surface roughness quality created by abrasive water jet and CO2 laser beam cutting. Tech Gaz 19(3):481–485Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hizir FE, Ural SO, Kumbur EC, Mench MM (2010) Characterization of interfacial morphology in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: micro-porous layer and catalyst layer surfaces. J Power Sources 195:3463–3471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lakshminarayanan AK, Malarvizhi S, Balasubramanian V (2011) Developing friction stir welding window for AA2219 aluminium alloy. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 21:2339–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ratnesh Kumar
    • 1
  • Somnath Chattopadhyaya
    • 1
  • Amit Rai Dixit
    • 1
  • Bhabani Bora
    • 1
  • Michal Zelenak
    • 2
  • Josef Foldyna
    • 2
  • Sergej Hloch
    • 3
    • 4
  • Petr Hlavacek
    • 2
  • Jiri Scucka
    • 5
  • Jiri Klich
    • 2
  • Libor Sitek
    • 2
  • Pedro Vilaca
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian School of MinesDhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Department of Material DisintegrationInstitute of Geonics of the CAS, v.v.i.OstravaCzech Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies TUKE with a seat in PrešovPlzeňská 1,Slovakia
  4. 4.Institute of Geonics of the CASv.v.i., OstravaCzech Republic
  5. 5.Department of Laboratory Research on GeomaterialsInstitute of Geonics of the CASv.v.i., OstravaCzech Republic
  6. 6.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAALTO UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations