Advertisement

Finite element analysis of surface milling of carbon fiber-reinforced composites

  • Seyedbehzad Ghafarizadeh
  • Jean-François ChatelainEmail author
  • Gilbert Lebrun
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Despite increased applications of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) materials in many industries, such as aerospace, their machining is still a challenge due to their heterogeneity and anisotropic nature. In this research, a finite element model is used to investigate the cutting forces, chip formation mechanism, and machining damage present during the flat end milling of unidirectional CFRP. The material is modeled as an equivalent orthotropic homogeneous material, and Hashin’s theory is used to characterize failure in plane stress conditions. The friction coefficient between the tool and the composite material was assumed to be dependent on the carbon fiber orientation. A comparison of modeling and experimental results indicates that the model successfully predicts the cutting forces. The numerical model predictions of machining damage around the cutting area due to fiber compression damage and matrix cracking and the relation between damage extension and fiber orientation are confirmed through a comparison with SEM images of machined edges and surfaces.

Keywords

Carbon fiber-reinforced plastics Milling Finite element analysis Machining damage Cutting forces 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Davim JP (2015) Machinability of fibre-reinforced plastics, vol 4. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Soldani X, Santiuste C, Muñoz-Sánchez A, Miguélez M (2011) Influence of tool geometry and numerical parameters when modeling orthogonal cutting of LFRP composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 42(9):1205–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dandekar CR, Shin YC (2012) Modeling of machining of composite materials: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 57:102–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nayak D, Bhatnagar N, Mahajan P (2005) Machining studies of UD-FRP composites part 2: finite element analysis. Mach Sci Technol 9(4):503–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lasri L, Nouari M, El Mansori M (2009) Modelling of chip separation in machining unidirectional FRP composites by stiffness degradation concept. Compos Sci Technol 69(5):684–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santiuste C, Soldani X, Miguélez MH (2010) Machining FEM model of long fiber composites for aeronautical components. Compos Struct 92(3):691–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mkaddem A, Demirci I, El Mansori M (2008) A micro–macro combined approach using FEM for modelling of machining of FRP composites: cutting forces analysis. Compos Sci Technol 68(15):3123–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mkaddem A, El Mansori M (2009) Finite element analysis when machining UGF-reinforced PMCs plates: chip formation, crack propagation and induced-damage. Mater Des 30(8):3295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santiuste C, Olmedo A, Soldani X, Miguélez H (2012) Delamination prediction in orthogonal machining of carbon long fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 31(13):875–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isbilir O, Ghassemieh E (2013) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of drilling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites. Journal of Composite Materials:0021998313484947Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghafarizadeh S, Lebrun G, Chatelain J-F (2015) Experimental investigation of the cutting temperature and surface quality during milling of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced plastic. Journal of Composite Materials:0021998315587131Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM (2009) D6641/D6641M-09: Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a combined loading compression (CLC) test fixture. West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ASTM (2012) D5379/D5379M: Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by the V-notched beam method. West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM (2014) D3039/D3039M: Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM (2008) D 792–08. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement. West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghafarizadeh S, Chatelain J-F, Lebrun G (2014) Effect of cutting tool lead angle on machining forces and surface finish of CFRP laminates. Science and Engineering of Composite MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Özel T, Altan T (2000) Process simulation using finite element method—prediction of cutting forces, tool stresses and temperatures in high-speed flat end milling. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 40(5):713–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li C, Lai X, Li H, Ni J (2007) Modeling of three-dimensional cutting forces in micro-end-milling. J Micromech Microeng 17(4):671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramulu M, Faridnia M, Garbini J, Jorgensen J (1991) Machining of graphite/epoxy composite materials with polycrystalline diamond (PCD) tools. J Eng Mater Technol 113(4):430–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arola D, Ramulu M (1997) Orthogonal cutting of fiber-reinforced composites: a finite element analysis. Int J Mech Sci 39(5):597–613CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramesh M, Seetharamu K, Ganesan N, Sivakumar M (1998) Analysis of machining of FRPs using FEM. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 38(12):1531–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang X, Zhang L (2003) An experimental investigation into the orthogonal cutting of unidirectional fibre reinforced plastics. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43(10):1015–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hibbitt D, Karlsson B, Sorensen P (2012) Abaqus 6.12 documentation and user manual. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rao GVG, Mahajan P, Bhatnagar N (2007) Machining of UD-GFRP composites chip formation mechanism. Compos Sci Technol 67(11):2271–81Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao GVG, Mahajan P, Bhatnagar N (2007) Micro-mechanical modeling of machining of FRP composites—cutting force analysis. Compos Sci Technol 67(3):579–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rentsch R, Pecat O, Brinksmeier E (2011) Macro and micro process modeling of the cutting of carbon fiber reinforced plastics using FEM. Procedia engineering 10:1823–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arola D, Sultan M, Ramulu M (2002) Finite element modeling of edge trimming fiber reinforced plastics. J Manuf Sci Eng 124(1):32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schön J (2004) Coefficient of friction and wear of a carbon fiber epoxy matrix composite. Wear 257(3):395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hashin Z (1980) Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 47(2):329–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hashin Z, Rotem A (1973) A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. J Compos Mater 7(4):448–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lapczyk I, Hurtado JA (2007) Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 38(11):2333–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dieter GE, Bacon D (1986) Mechanical metallurgy, vol 3. McGraw-Hill New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shi Y, Swait T, Soutis C (2012) Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct 94(9):2902–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seyedbehzad Ghafarizadeh
    • 1
  • Jean-François Chatelain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gilbert Lebrun
    • 2
  1. 1.École de technologie supérieureUniversité du QuébecMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR)Trois-RivièresCanada

Personalised recommendations