Advertisement

Hard turning behavior improvement using NSGA-II and PSO-NN hybrid model

  • Khaider BouachaEmail author
  • Asma Terrab
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The present work concerns an investigation and optimization of hard turning behavior of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool. The combined effects of the process parameters (cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, cutting time, and workpiece hardness) on performance characteristics (tool wear, surface roughness, and cutting forces) are investigated through the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Also, the relationship between process parameters and performance characteristics through the artificial neural networks and response surface methodologies are modeled. Moreover, an attempt has been made to find the best process parameters combination that optimizes simultaneously the performance characteristics. For this purpose, the particle swarm optimization-based neural network (PSO-NN) hybrid model and the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II)-based RSM models are proposed and compared for their performances. The results show that the workpiece hardness strongly influences the cutting forces, and it plays a dominant role in the tool wear and the surface roughness variations as compared to other process parameters. The depth of cut affects strongly the cutting forces. The cutting time has a considerable effect on all performance characteristics. They show, also, that the artificial neural network (ANN) model estimates the performance characteristics with high accuracy as compared to the RSM models. Moreover, it was found that NSGA II and PSO-NN approaches performed efficiently and they predicted near similar results. Furthermore, the NSGA-II exhibits better performance when compared to the PSO-NN methodology. However, the PSO-NN has been shown to outperform the NSGA-II methodology in computational time.

Keywords

ANN PSO NSGA-II Hard turning Tool wear Surface roughness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Davim J P (Ed.) (2011) Machining of hard materials. Springer.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tönshoff HK, Arendt C, Ben Amor R (2000) Cutting of hardened steel. Ann CIRP 49:547–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    König W, Berktold A, Koch KF (1993) Turning versus grinding—a comparison of surface integrity aspects and attainable accuracies. Ann CIRP 42:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klocke F, Brinksmeier E, Weinert K (2005) Capability profile of hard cutting and grinding processes. Ann CIRP 54:557–580Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Figueira L, Davim JP (2009) Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27(4):754–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Figueira L, Davim JP (2009) Analysis of machinability during hard turning of cold work tool steel (type: AISI D2). Mater Manuf Process 24(12):1373–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dereli D, Filiz IH, Bayakosoglu A (2001) Optimizing cutting parameters in process planning of prismatic parts by using genetic algorithms. Int J Prod Res 39(15):3303–3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bouacha K, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2010) Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 28:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bouacha K, Yallese MA, Khamel S, Belhadi S (2014) Analysis and optimization of hard turning operation using cubic boron nitride tool. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 45:160–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paiva AP, Ferreirahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924013607000076 - cor1#cor1 JR, Balestrassi PP (2007) A multivariate hybrid approach applied to AISI 52100 hardened steel turning optimization. J Mater Process Technol 189(1–3):26–35Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yusup N, Zain AM, Hashim SZM (2012) Evolutionary techniques in optimizing machining parameters: review and recent applications (2007–2011). Expert Syst Appl 39(10):9909–9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xi J, Liao G (2009) Cutting parameter optimization based on particle swarm optimization. Paper presented at the 2009 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing Technology and Automation. ICICTA 1:255–258Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bharathi RS, Baskar N (2011) Particle swarm optimization technique for determining optimal machining parameters of different work piece materials in turning operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(5–8):445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sardiñas RQ, Santana MR, Brindis EA (2006) Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning processes. Eng Appl Artif Intel 19(2):127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Datta R, Deb K (2009) A classical-cum-evolutionary multi-objective optimization for optimal machining parameters. CityGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yusoff Y, Ngadiman MS, Zain AM (2011) Overview of NSGA-II for optimizing machining process parameters. Procedia Eng 15:3978–3983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang SH, Natarajan U (2010) Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning process using differential evolution and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II approaches. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49(5–8):773–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karatas C, Sozen A, Dulek E (2009) Modelling of residual stresses in the shot peened material C-1020 by artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl 36:3514–3521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2(3):221–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalyanmoy D (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Singapore. ISBN 9814-12-685-3zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deb K (2008) A robust evolutionary framework for multi-objective optimization. Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO’08). 12–16 July, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. ACM Press, NewYork, pp 633–640Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gao X, Chen B, He X, Qiu T, Li J, Wang C, Zhang L (2008) Multi-objective optimization for the periodic operation of the naphtha pyrolysis process using a new parallel hybrid algorithm combining NSGA-II with SQP. Comput Chem Eng 32:2801–2811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, In Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science (MHS’95):39–43.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. IEEE Int Conference on Neural Netw 4:1942–1948Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. USA IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 69–73Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sandvik Coromant, Main catalogue (2006). The official website of the Sandvik Coromant: <http://www.coromant.sandvik.com> [accessed 10.04.2007].
  28. 28.
    Luo SY, Liao YS, Tsai YY (1999) Wear characteristics in turning high hardness alloy steel by ceramic and CBN tools. J Mater Process Technol 88:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen W (2000) Cutting forces and surface finish when machining medium hardness steel using CBN tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(3):455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lalwani DI, Mehta NK, Jain PK (2008) Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel. J Mater Process Technol 206:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kumar KVBSK, Choudhury SK (2008) Investigation of tool wear and cutting force in cryogenic machining using design of experiments. J Mater Process Technol 203:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dimla DE Sr (2004) The impact of cutting conditions on cutting forces and vibration signals in turning with plane face geometry inserts. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1708–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ng EG, Aspinwall DK, Brazil D, Monaghan J (1999) Modelling of temperature and forces when orthogonally machining hardened steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:885–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    König W, Komanduri R, Tönshoff HK, Ackershott G (1984) Machining of hard materials. Ann CIRP 33:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu XL, Wen DH, Li ZJ, Xiao L, Yan FG (2002) Cutting temperature and tool wear of hard turning hardened bearing steel. J Mater Process Technol 129:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and TechnologyMohamed Chérif Messaadia UniversitySouk AhrasAlgeria
  2. 2.Laboratory of Mechanics and Structures (LMS)8 May 1945 UniversityGuelmaAlgeria
  3. 3.Department of English, Faculty of Literature Humanities and Social SciencesBadji Mokhtar UniversityAnnabaAlgeria

Personalised recommendations